Community
Wiki Posts
Search

VX adding SFO-MSY, KOA, RDU, BNA and others

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2017, 12:01 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Paradise
Posts: 1,617
The A319 will definitely do better for Indianapolis, Nashville, New Orleans and Raleigh capacity wise.
Yellowjj is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2017, 9:42 am
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Programs: GM on VX, UA, AA, HA, AS, SY; Budget Fastbreak
Posts: 27,585
Excited for SFO-koa! It'll give ual competition and probably encourage HA to add that route!
gaobest is online now  
Old Mar 16, 2017, 3:00 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: Amtrak Guest Rewards (SE), Virgin America Elevate, Hyatt Gold Passport (Platinum), VIA Preference
Posts: 3,134
I'm guessing that this is down to utilizing these planes on the longer-haul routes as well. Remember, AS already serves the above cities from SEA but not SFO, so adding VX service to these markets isn't a shocker in the context of the merger.

With that said, I don't recall how this lines up with any VX equipment deliveries.

I'm willing to entertain the idea that AS might keep the brand if it makes a strong showing in some of these markets. It seems very unlikely, but I'll entertain it for now.
GrayAnderson is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2017, 4:09 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: B6 Mosaic, Bonvoy LT Titanium (x SPG LT), IHG Spire, UA Silver
Posts: 5,847
Originally Posted by GrayAnderson
I'm willing to entertain the idea that AS might keep the brand if it makes a strong showing in some of these markets. It seems very unlikely, but I'll entertain it for now.
I would rate the likelihood of that at zero at this point. There may be some chance to keep some of the features of the inflight experience but no chance at all that the VX name/brand will be retained.
sfozrhfco is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2017, 7:32 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferably waiting for takeoff
Programs: AA EXP, MVPG, DL Silver, United Silver, Accor Platinum, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 458
Originally Posted by GrayAnderson
I'm guessing that this is down to utilizing these planes on the longer-haul routes as well. Remember, AS already serves the above cities from SEA but not SFO, so adding VX service to these markets isn't a shocker in the context of the merger.

With that said, I don't recall how this lines up with any VX equipment deliveries.

I'm willing to entertain the idea that AS might keep the brand if it makes a strong showing in some of these markets. It seems very unlikely, but I'll entertain it for now.
It will really be interesting to see what Brad Tilden and company deicide to keep of the VX identity going forward. There is so much of the soft product that is unique with VX - on board environment, design style from online to marketing, use of innovation for the inflight experience.

Alaska as been looking at the VX product very close for the last year and must be saying to themselves, there really is something valuable about the way VX does things. They also have to be looking at themselves and saying what can we change going forward.

Of all the things they could copy or infuse into Alaska I can't see them keeping the name Virgin long term. 1, Too much market confusion with 49% Delta owned VS. 2, Why pay the brand fee to Richard if they don't have to. They could keep it for 2, maybe 3 years for special hubs and routes as they acclimate those loyalists to the new airline.
jimmygottfredson is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2017, 11:45 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: BOS
Programs: B6/Mosaic/AF/VX/AS Gold Hertz PC HH Dia. AMEX Plat SPG/Marr Gold Nat. EE FPC Plat
Posts: 833
Originally Posted by jimmygottfredson
It will really be interesting to see what Brad Tilden and company deicide to keep of the VX identity going forward. There is so much of the soft product that is unique with VX - on board environment, design style from online to marketing, use of innovation for the inflight experience.

Alaska as been looking at the VX product very close for the last year and must be saying to themselves, there really is something valuable about the way VX does things. They also have to be looking at themselves and saying what can we change going forward.

Of all the things they could copy or infuse into Alaska I can't see them keeping the name Virgin long term. 1, Too much market confusion with 49% Delta owned VS. 2, Why pay the brand fee to Richard if they don't have to. They could keep it for 2, maybe 3 years for special hubs and routes as they acclimate those loyalists to the new airline.

I agree with everything above. Ditching the VX brand too quickly would be suicidal to me. If I were back in the SF as before, it would not be hard to switch to DL or wincing, AA. UA is a no go. Full stop.

But, and this is the big but: AS will have to seriously step up its inflight experience to keep the VX loyalists. In the AS forum, they seem to think VX is just about pretty lighting, but indeed, VX has done a lot of innovative things making things better for the average traveler, as well as elites.

Now that the majors are making good profits, they are finally investing in the hard product. I've not been on a really awful mainline plane on DL or AA in more than a year. AS even with their newest -900 models have terrible seats and they are noisier than any VX plane.

Just saying...
ptownca is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 9:27 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: West Michigan
Programs: DL, UA, AA, B6, BA (airline status-free leisure traveler), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,963
Originally Posted by gaobest
Excited for SFO-koa! It'll give ual competition and probably encourage HA to add that route!
I totally agree! The more competition (and/or award flight availability) to the Hawaiian Islands, the better.
loomis is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2017, 12:44 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: Amtrak Guest Rewards (SE), Virgin America Elevate, Hyatt Gold Passport (Platinum), VIA Preference
Posts: 3,134
Originally Posted by jimmygottfredson
It will really be interesting to see what Brad Tilden and company deicide to keep of the VX identity going forward. There is so much of the soft product that is unique with VX - on board environment, design style from online to marketing, use of innovation for the inflight experience.

Alaska as been looking at the VX product very close for the last year and must be saying to themselves, there really is something valuable about the way VX does things. They also have to be looking at themselves and saying what can we change going forward.

Of all the things they could copy or infuse into Alaska I can't see them keeping the name Virgin long term. 1, Too much market confusion with 49% Delta owned VS. 2, Why pay the brand fee to Richard if they don't have to. They could keep it for 2, maybe 3 years for special hubs and routes as they acclimate those loyalists to the new airline.
True. I'm guessing that some sort of secondary branding is more likely (maybe call it Alaska Star;-)) unless they're going to consider taking the branding system-wide. The other option is to rename the improved product (perhaps VX F becomes Business Class?). As it stands, if they try to merge both sorts of service under a single banner that strikes me as a non-starter because of what that would do for managing the consumer experience.
GrayAnderson is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2017, 3:01 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,386
AS owns JetAmerica. In theory they could rebrand both airlines as JetAmerica...
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2017, 7:17 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS
Posts: 2,293
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
AS owns JetAmerica. In theory they could rebrand both airlines as JetAmerica...
I thought JETAMERICA became AS in 1987?
pcoll is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2017, 12:49 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Programs: DL-Platinum / AS-PlatPro / Hyatt - Glob / Hilton-Diamond
Posts: 1,573
Originally Posted by pcoll
I thought JETAMERICA became AS in 1987?
Jet America was purchased by AS.
AS was in existence LONG (LONG) before Jet America was even a twinkle in their parent's eye.

But I don't think AS reviving the name is a good idea.
steve64 is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2017, 8:34 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SFO
Posts: 335
Originally Posted by jimmygottfredson
It will really be interesting to see what Brad Tilden and company deicide to keep of the VX identity going forward. There is so much of the soft product that is unique with VX - on board environment, design style from online to marketing, use of innovation for the inflight experience.

Alaska as been looking at the VX product very close for the last year and must be saying to themselves, there really is something valuable about the way VX does things. They also have to be looking at themselves and saying what can we change going forward.

The details of the brand identity and what direction AS will go will be revealed tomorrow, Mar 23.
VXCabinCrew is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2017, 1:45 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferably waiting for takeoff
Programs: AA EXP, MVPG, DL Silver, United Silver, Accor Platinum, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 458
Originally Posted by VXCabinCrew
The details of the brand identity and what direction AS will go will be revealed tomorrow, Mar 23.
Thank you for the heads up. Looking forward to seeing the details and what Alaska is thinking.
jimmygottfredson is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2017, 2:54 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Programs: Alaska Tanzanite 100K
Posts: 3,858
Some of the changes coming down the pipe are what some expected, its not all bad, but has some good stuff too. I'm hoping they keep the stanchion between F and Y!
UAPremierExec is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2017, 4:14 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferably waiting for takeoff
Programs: AA EXP, MVPG, DL Silver, United Silver, Accor Platinum, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 458
Funny thing is Richard Branson is coming, or is in, town promoting the new Virgin Atlantic flight. I'm sure timing is coincidental, but it could make for some conjecture.
jimmygottfredson is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.