Community
Wiki Posts
Search

the grapevine: US and UA are talking about something

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2009, 7:41 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Programs: AA EXP; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, UA 1.56MM (fmr UA1K)
Posts: 5,770
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Keep UA my UA
No doubt. I am on US every now and then. It is okay. However, I wouldn't ever want to see this merger.
Renard is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2009, 2:07 pm
  #62  
EAL
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: West Hollywood, CA (LAX)
Programs: United Mileage Plus, Virgin America Elevate
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by PWMFlyer19
Or maybe talking about *A integration/benefits/gate consolidation in wake of Continental joining in a little over a month ? Continental cant get too close just yet, but UAL and US certainly can talk. Neither has much cash, but figuring out a way to save money certainly needs talking.
I noticed UA pulled their red eye non-stop from LAX-PHL and their morning flight from PHL-LAX...now they only operate one flight a day between these two cities? Do you think UA and US are trying to consolidate on this route?
EAL is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2009, 5:51 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PIT/DFW/MEL; AA Exec. Platinum & 4MM, QF WP
Posts: 7,689
Originally Posted by EAL
I noticed UA pulled their red eye non-stop from LAX-PHL and their morning flight from PHL-LAX...now they only operate one flight a day between these two cities? Do you think UA and US are trying to consolidate on this route?
it is one of the routes that AA had agreed to fly in the previous US-UA merger.
martin33 is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2009, 8:15 pm
  #64  
EAL
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: West Hollywood, CA (LAX)
Programs: United Mileage Plus, Virgin America Elevate
Posts: 141
but that was a long time ago and AA never started the route. Are there plans for them to start it up or something?
EAL is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2009, 9:11 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 62
Originally Posted by gaucho99
More rumors.....merger inevitable???

http://www.usaviation.com/forums/ind...howtopic=47082
Two pertinent things have happened, as I can tell, that lend strength to this rumor mill:

1) US's $137 million cash influx from their stock offering: http://www.businessweek.com/ap/finan.../D9B0IO5O2.htm

2) US's lack of fuel hedging: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3/fde5850c-a...nclick_check=1

For example, US Airways – the most domestically focused, and with perhaps the most marginal route network – has barely any fuel hedging in place now. Should the winter prove particularly harsh, liquidation or consolidation will be the only realistic options remaining. The latter will be good for the industry, if not for the forced mergees, but only slowly and after considerably more pain.


Do these two offset each other enough to keep a US-UA merger out of play?

If so, whose stock would would be more attractive to purchase at this point? US or UA? Or neither? @:-)
onebriskworld is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 7:51 am
  #66  
PHL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,067
Originally Posted by EAL
I noticed UA pulled their red eye non-stop from LAX-PHL and their morning flight from PHL-LAX...now they only operate one flight a day between these two cities? Do you think UA and US are trying to consolidate on this route?
It's a seasonal change. Assuming the two airlines are still two separate airlines next Summer, UA will likely bring them back.
PHL is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 7:52 am
  #67  
PHL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,067
Originally Posted by EAL
but that was a long time ago and AA never started the route. Are there plans for them to start it up or something?
Absolutely not. And too bad - they have a large enough presence at LAX that it could work. Not so much with SFO, though.
PHL is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 11:42 am
  #68  
EAL
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: West Hollywood, CA (LAX)
Programs: United Mileage Plus, Virgin America Elevate
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by PHL
Absolutely not. And too bad - they have a large enough presence at LAX that it could work. Not so much with SFO, though.
Yeah, thats too bad! They definitely have a large enough presence here at LAX to make it work, I agree. It would be nice to see them on this route...they already do well on the LAX-EWR route.
EAL is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 12:08 pm
  #69  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
Originally Posted by PHL
Absolutely not. And too bad - they have a large enough presence at LAX that it could work. Not so much with SFO, though.
Who knows with AA's large purchase of additional 737-800's? At least AA will have more planes with transcon range.
formeraa is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 2:26 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: UA 1K 1MMer & LT UC (when flying UA); Hyatt Credit Cardist; HHonors Diamond; Marriott Gold via UA 1K
Posts: 6,956
Originally Posted by EAL
Yeah, thats too bad! They definitely have a large enough presence here at LAX to make it work, I agree. It would be nice to see them on this route...they already do well on the LAX-EWR route.
Agreed. If I only had a dollar for every time one of my friends or co-workers told me they were flying LAX-ORD-PHL on AA, I would have enough money to fly PHL-BOS on a BloFare!
SS255 is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 2:35 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PHL/EWR
Programs: UA, AA
Posts: 1,821
Wouldn't it make sense for UA and US to be talking right now, as they coordinate CO's entry into *A?

I suspect what we'll be hearing is lounge access details, any updates to earning across airlines, terminal moves, that kind of stuff. One can only dream, but maybe they'll all have to do free booze in order to stay competitive with DL. In any case, they have to do some amount of talking, and probably will be sharing some services to cut costs.
PSU Mudder is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 4:30 pm
  #72  
PHL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,067
Originally Posted by formeraa
Who knows with AA's large purchase of additional 737-800's? At least AA will have more planes with transcon range.
Those 738's are phasing out their very large, fuel guzzling, aging fleet of MD-80's. So, the net increase in aircraft (if any) will be small.
PHL is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 5:23 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PIT/DFW/MEL; AA Exec. Platinum & 4MM, QF WP
Posts: 7,689
Originally Posted by PHL
Those 738's are phasing out their very large, fuel guzzling, aging fleet of MD-80's. So, the net increase in aircraft (if any) will be small.
nevertheless, they will still have upwards of 200 more mainline aircraft in service than UA, which is rapidly shrinking its mainline fleet to near US-size...
martin33 is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2009, 5:57 pm
  #74  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,421
Originally Posted by onebriskworld
Two pertinent things have happened, as I can tell, that lend strength to this rumor mill:

1) US's $137 million cash influx from their stock offering: http://www.businessweek.com/ap/finan.../D9B0IO5O2.htm

2) US's lack of fuel hedging: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3/fde5850c-a...nclick_check=1
The lack of fuel hedging has NOTHING to do with potential mergers. The volatility, unpredictability and general craziness of the oil market (even WN could have had liquidity troubles putting up additional cash to cover their losing fuel hedge last year) has kept US away. A smart move, IMHO.

As far as the stock offerings go, I don't know the motivations. I see that UA did one today, too. But "everyone" in the industry is currently doing them. CFOs seem to like having lots of cash.
iahphx is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2009, 1:27 am
  #75  
EAL
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: West Hollywood, CA (LAX)
Programs: United Mileage Plus, Virgin America Elevate
Posts: 141
I just saw over on the CO forum that they're now talking about merger rumors with CO and UA!
EAL is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.