some personal comments about US Airways
I flew on an all USAIR itn (my first:)) JFK-PHX-LAS (5/15); LAS-CLT-JFK (5/18):
(1) JFK-PHX (dep: 6:35 am) was delayed due to the incoming red-eye PHX-JFK. I got to the gate at 6:00 am--I noticed the GAs every few minutes went to the window to see if the inbound had arrived; don't the GAs get official updates as to when a flight has landed.:confused: (2) I arrived in PHX at 9:50 am, PHX-LAS was scheduled to depart at 10:10 am--but since 61 pax from JFK-PHX were connecting to LAS, they held the plane.^ I was following gate info on my ipad: JFK-PHX was to arrive at A17, PHX-LAS dep from A19 (a few feet away). The FA in FC had all the gate info wrong--doesn't he get the same info I do? (3) PDBs on all segments.^ (4) Most of the FAs on my 4 flts looked 1/2 the age (or 30 years younger) whichever is less:), than the FAs on most of AA flts I've taken.:rolleyes: (5) I was upgraded on all segments considerably earlier than AA does.* (6) My 5/15 miles have NOT yet posted. (7) CLT is a VERY busy airport. *Hopefully this is a preview of the NEW AA.^ |
FAs get a print out before they take off so if anything changed in the 5+ hours you were in the air they would not know.
|
Procedure at AA is (was?) to print out connecting gate info on the flight deck printer not too long before arrival. Unless it's a really short flight, printing that info on the ground before departure is a complete waste of paper.
A while back there was a substantial thread containing arguments about FAs reading connecting gate info. :) |
What does age have to do with anything? The FAs all have to demonstrate regularly they're capable of evacuations, etc. through testing, and the criteria for deciding if an FA can work are based on BFOQS - Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications - these days, thank goodness. :)
|
Originally Posted by FWAAA
(Post 24834220)
Procedure at AA is (was?) to print out connecting gate info on the flight deck printer not too long before arrival. Unless it's a really short flight, printing that info on the ground before departure is a complete waste of paper.
A while back there was a substantial thread containing arguments about FAs reading connecting gate info. :) |
The whole connecting gate thing is foolish. If you care, you can pull it off the app. If you don't (and you really shouldn't as there's not much to do about it until you are off the aircraft), just look at a monitor or ask on arrival.
|
Originally Posted by JDiver
(Post 24834771)
What does age have to do with anything? The FAs all have to demonstrate regularly they're capable of evacuations, etc. through testing, and the criteria for deciding if an FA can work are based on BFOQS - Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications - these days, thank goodness. :)
|
Originally Posted by Often1
(Post 24835028)
The whole connecting gate thing is foolish. If you care, you can pull it off the app. If you don't (and you really shouldn't as there's not much to do about it until you are off the aircraft), just look at a monitor or ask on arrival.
|
I take this early morning flight pretty regularly and it's never been held up by a late incoming. That was unlucky.
|
Originally Posted by nrr
(Post 24834031)
(7) CLT is a VERY busy airport.
|
Originally Posted by Often1
(Post 24835028)
The whole connecting gate thing is foolish. If you care, you can pull it off the app. If you don't (and you really shouldn't as there's not much to do about it until you are off the aircraft), just look at a monitor or ask on arrival.
I agree there are other methods you can find the info, but they give it to you in the air, at least on AA, so it is sooner than you'd hear on the app once you land. It's a holdover from before other methods were as easy to get the same info, but I certainly don't think it's "foolish." |
Originally Posted by LovePrunes
(Post 24843515)
I agree there are other methods you can find the info, but they give it to you in the air, at least on AA, so it is sooner than you'd hear on the app once you land. It's a holdover from before other methods were as easy to get the same info, but I certainly don't think it's "foolish."
|
I've always thought of CLT as a rather sane, well-run hub (as hubs go). Sometimes busy, but the wide, modern concourses give it a more pleasant feel. When I think "crazy busy", I think ORD...especially in the areas/concourses with all of the AE or UX gates. It has a bus terminal feel to it.
Much rather connect there than Philly...that's for sure. I've never had an issue at PHX, but that airport is almost always O&D for me: I rarely connect there. |
As a long time flyer I've only recently begun to fly US. I must say, with the exception of the 'one-step up from a folding chair - no frills seats', the service has been exceptional. Great gate agents, FAs, consistent PDBs, on par with AA food (tho US is consistent with linen while AA is not), I have no gripes at all.
|
Originally Posted by airplanegod
(Post 24841763)
Depends. Just recently had a long layover there and there were a couple of times (including when I arrived and when I left) where the airport was wall to wall people, couldn't take a step out of line or you'd bump into someone or a motorized cart. Then there were times when there was absolutely no one walking around. I know people don't like extremely long (or short) layovers but with the long ones it's interesting to both people watch and see the airport "in action". Saw the same at PHL later in the day.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:50 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.