CLT-MAD gets upguaged..because of merger?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DCA/CLT/HKG
Programs: AA EXP (Former US CP)
Posts: 730
CLT-MAD gets upguaged..because of merger?
I was looking at taking a trip to the Mediterranean next year, and most likely flying to MAD. I noticed that CLT-MAD next year will be an A333, and has a very early start date when compared to this year (I think the flight resumed in May, but next year it appears to resume in March).
Could this be an early preparation for the upcoming merger? I also noticed that the second daily FRA flight from both PHL and CLT will be a 767 next year instead of a A332.
Could this be an early preparation for the upcoming merger? I also noticed that the second daily FRA flight from both PHL and CLT will be a 767 next year instead of a A332.
#2
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: PHL
Programs: AA Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 480
Probably has more to do with US receiving the rest of their A330 order from Airbus.
#3
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: US CP, SPG Plat
Posts: 310
It could be some of both -- but I would think there'd be more capacity via Spain than via Germany in the future just because of the idiosyncrasies of oneworld vs. *A.
#4
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PHL
Programs: Former long-time US GP; now AA dirt
Posts: 4,904
I was looking at taking a trip to the Mediterranean next year, and most likely flying to MAD. I noticed that CLT-MAD next year will be an A333, and has a very early start date when compared to this year (I think the flight resumed in May, but next year it appears to resume in March).
Could this be an early preparation for the upcoming merger? I also noticed that the second daily FRA flight from both PHL and CLT will be a 767 next year instead of a A332.
Could this be an early preparation for the upcoming merger? I also noticed that the second daily FRA flight from both PHL and CLT will be a 767 next year instead of a A332.
#5
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: AA EXP (LT Plat 2MM), Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt Plat, SPG Plat75, UA1K
Posts: 1,248
Agreed - you'll see increased connections on IB via Madrid due to OW versus pushing traffic via Frankfurt to LH and *A.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NC
Programs: AAConciergeKey/1MM, DL DM/2 MM, UA Gold,Hilton Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 11,961
So does this mean that CLT-MAD will definitely be coming back next year? I was surprised to see CLT-DUB back for next year too (I would have thought Dublin would not be back since it is not a oneworld hub, but it's interesting to see it!). Or are these just placeholders in the schedule?
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,058
I suppose if the merger does not go through, US can make aircraft changes right up until the day of flight....
On a similar note, I wonder how long the LH flight from MUC-CLT will last once US exits *A. I don't think there's enough O&D, as that likely flight relied on a lot of connecting traffic.
On a similar note, I wonder how long the LH flight from MUC-CLT will last once US exits *A. I don't think there's enough O&D, as that likely flight relied on a lot of connecting traffic.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: 1K 1MM; Bonvoy Ambassador; Nat'l EE; Hertz PC; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,465
My thoughts are just the opposite, I thought there WAS a lot of O&D due to the BMW plant (among other factors).
#9
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MSP/BUF/BNA/LFT
Programs: AA Plat, Priority Club Gold, Choice Privileges Gold
Posts: 1,224
So does this mean that CLT-MAD will definitely be coming back next year? I was surprised to see CLT-DUB back for next year too (I would have thought Dublin would not be back since it is not a oneworld hub, but it's interesting to see it!). Or are these just placeholders in the schedule?
#10
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: CLT; Ex-SEL
Programs: LH, DL/NW, US, HHon, SPG
Posts: 379
It’s going to be very interesting to see what happens to LH428/429. I sure hope we don’t lose it.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NC
Programs: AAConciergeKey/1MM, DL DM/2 MM, UA Gold,Hilton Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 11,961
Yes, but AA operates DUB from other cities and US offers it from PHL. So am surprised to see if come back from CLT as well...MAD works easily for connections on both ends.
#12
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 2,842
Probably just a shift towards the 330s with more on property while the 762 are either retired or used on more of the domestic/caribbean runs. The FRA flts on the 762 could signal an impending change in the CLT/PHL-Germany market. A 762 protects the flt with the fewest seats so if it is ultimately cancelled/changed there are fewer paxs to rebook.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CLT
Posts: 7,249
That's what most of the international traffic I've noticed in CLT, especially the CLT-GIG route. It is pretty much people going XXX-CLT-DUB or XXX-CLT-GIG, not CLT-DUB-XXX. Places can work as a destination if they originate from a hub and CLT is US Airways largest hub. I think they are trying to move more of the connecting traffic through CLT instead of PHL.
#14
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ORD / MDW / FLL
Programs: DL DM/1MM, AA EXP, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 2,295
Adding capacity from US hubs to MAD makes a lot of sense post-merger. If you have never flown into MAD T4 (the IB terminal) I can tell you it is, without question, the nicest hub terminal in Europe. Architecturally stunning, easy to navigate and not congested. I do anything to connect here rather than LHR which become the options post-merger.
Personally, I think the shuffling of TATL flights from east coast hubs is going to be interesting to sort out. If seems logical that flights to MUC and FRA will be eliminated / downsized owing to the fact that they will not longer be used to connecting airports for travel beyond. When I think about cutting back in PHL all I keep thinking about is how JFK does not have the available slots to serve as a hub airport for TATL connections. When you think about how many cities US feeds into the PHL hub that AA won't / can't touch via JFK I keep thinking any movement to reduce TATL flying out of PHL is essentially handing business over to DL and UA since their ops in NY can support what US/AA can't. But, this is why I don't run an airline.
Personally, I think the shuffling of TATL flights from east coast hubs is going to be interesting to sort out. If seems logical that flights to MUC and FRA will be eliminated / downsized owing to the fact that they will not longer be used to connecting airports for travel beyond. When I think about cutting back in PHL all I keep thinking about is how JFK does not have the available slots to serve as a hub airport for TATL connections. When you think about how many cities US feeds into the PHL hub that AA won't / can't touch via JFK I keep thinking any movement to reduce TATL flying out of PHL is essentially handing business over to DL and UA since their ops in NY can support what US/AA can't. But, this is why I don't run an airline.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,058
Long before US was in *A, they flew PHL-MUC/FRA, in addition to LH flying PHL-FRA so I don't see these routes going anywhere as the O&D is still there.