Community
Wiki Posts
Search

US Airways FA arrested at FCO (gun in the trolley) (merged threads)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2013, 1:00 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 295
If this moronic flight attendant's "mistake" has adverse affects on the Known Crew Member (KCM) program for dues paying ALPA pilots - the ones who paid for the development of KCM over the course of years and who it was intended for - s/he might want to think about just staying in Italy.
Hammer0425 is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 1:18 pm
  #47  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,677
Originally Posted by Hammer0425
If this moronic flight attendant's "mistake" has adverse affects on the Known Crew Member (KCM) program for dues paying ALPA pilots - the ones who paid for the development of KCM over the course of years and who it was intended for - s/he might want to think about just staying in Italy.
If it has adverse effects, it won't be the FA's fault.

It will be the bureaucrats and politicians who use this incident as an excuse to 'strengthen' the KCM program so that this 'can never happen again'.
chollie is online now  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 1:43 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Amsterdam
Programs: A3, BA, OZ,
Posts: 1,099
I hope this will make the world realise the importance of screening incoming international pax to ensure that guns don't make it into those countries at all. The fact that somebody could "accidentally" leave their gun in their bag is appalling.
AlwaysFlyStar is online now  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 2:06 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 739
Originally Posted by AlwaysFlyStar
I hope this will make the world realise the importance of screening incoming international pax to ensure that guns don't make it into those countries at all. The fact that somebody could "accidentally" leave their gun in their bag is appalling.
Fully agree. Our governments should not be accepting any obscure USA criteria for who is a "safe flyer" and who is not. It's the same reason I'm opposed to anyone arriving at our airports who is "TSA Pre-Checked". There is zero accountability as to what goes on behind the scenes with any of those programs. Case in point, somebody was in possession of an illegal gun on our streets.... Hopefully the EC will take action (but probably not... )
Bob'sYourUncle is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 2:14 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,745
Originally Posted by Bob'sYourUncle
Fully agree. Our governments should not be accepting any obscure USA criteria for who is a "safe flyer" and who is not. It's the same reason I'm opposed to anyone arriving at our airports who is "TSA Pre-Checked". There is zero accountability as to what goes on behind the scenes with any of those programs. Case in point, somebody was in possession of an illegal gun on our streets.... Hopefully the EC will take action (but probably not... )
Your post in nonsensical.
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 2:33 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ithaca, NY
Programs: AA Platinum
Posts: 147
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
Agreed. I see no reason to think she was a danger to anyone. The only threat is if some bad guy found the gun and that's not likely.
According to Italian news reports, the flight attendant was in Rome on Saturday night, the night that there were shootings in the city, something that is unusual in Rome. Because the Italian authorities found ammunition with the gun, including spent bullets, they are opening an investigation to discover whether there is a connection between the flight attendant and the shootings, even though the possibility of a connection may seem unlikely.

I was at FCO the morning of the arrest--hence my keen interest in this thread--preparing to board another US flight out of FCO, 719, which was delayed 3 hours for a "mechanical" problem. It may be that there was a "mechanical" problem, or it may be that the authorities were additionally checking all of the US Airways crew members. (I did not witness the arrest and did not know about it until yesterday.)

According to at least one news source, the flight attendant apparently offered three different answers in response to the question about how she happened to be carrying a gun and ammo into FCO (see link below). She said she was doing a friend a "favor." She said she had not been checked in the US, because checking was sporadic. And she said that she had taken her son's bag by mistake, unaware that it contained a gun.

She seems to be in prison. Since the Italian legal system, like the British system, presumes a person to be guilty until proven innocent, she is for the moment in very deep trouble.

Here is a link to the news report that I have summarized above:
http://www.cinquequotidiano.it/news/...manette-19205/
Joanna2360 is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 2:50 pm
  #52  
Community Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,476
Originally Posted by Joanna2360
She seems to be in prison. Since the Italian legal system, like the British system, presumes a person to be guilty until proven innocent, she is for the moment in very deep trouble.
I don't know the specifics of the Italian legal system, but I can promise you that the British one presumes a person to be innocent until proven guilty. My best guess is that most European systems, with some local tweaks, work off the same principle.

It is perfectly possible that the FA was refused bail, and was therefore (using British parlance) remanded in custody. I would expect anyone caught with a gun in an airport to be treated with a certain amount of suspicion in the UK, and I doubt Italy is much different.

None of this prejudices her trial.
NWIFlyer is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 2:59 pm
  #53  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,677
Changing her story is a bad mistake - whether she just panicked and tried to get off with exculpatory 'white' lies or she was (shockingly) up to something.

You'd think she's been an FA long enough to have a better understanding of the likely repercussions from something like this, unlike an infrequent flyer, for example.

Given her statement, hard to believe there won't be at least a temporary knee-jerk reactionary stepping up of random KCM bag checks.
chollie is online now  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 3:20 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: MEX/YVR/YYF
Programs: AS MVP/AC75K/AM Gold/UA*S/SPG-Marriott Lifetime Titanium/Accor-FPC Gold/HHDiamond/Hyatt Exp
Posts: 5,035
Originally Posted by Scrooge McDuck
No, it does not. But it happens again and again that US gun-owners assume that their right to carry a weapon or that their permit for a weapon applies to all other nations as well.

Luckily, she was caught. Regardless if the weapon was "forgotten" or not, being a FA and/or a gun owner, this is not to be forgotten. If it happens, then there are consequences to be taken. There are some things a professional/responsible person is not to forget. Forgetting a gun in luggage is one of them. It may kill people - just think about all the cases were a gun accidently was fired because it was still loaded. Now think of that in a fully loaded plane.
It is a regular occurrence at the US-Canada that CBSA officers discover firearms that were undeclared by US citizens. In far too many cases, the offender is told that the firearms are not permitted in Canada and they can be left at the border and retrieved upon return into the US. Mind-boggling to me, but happens many times daily.

I do feel for the FA. Her action were careless without a doubt, but I highly doubt there was any ill-intent and thankfully there is nothing more to the story in that regard.
PointWeasel is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 3:28 pm
  #55  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,730
Originally Posted by Joanna2360
Since the Italian legal system, like the British system, presumes a person to be guilty until proven innocent, she is for the moment in very deep trouble.
Excuse me? That is totally incorrect.

From the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of the Council of Europe:

Originally Posted by Council of Europe
Article 6
Right to a Fair Trial

2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
From the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union:

Originally Posted by European Commission
Article 48
Presumption of innocence and right of defence

1. Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
Both Italy and the United Kingdom, as members of both the Council of Europe and the European Union, are bound by both.
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 3:34 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SYR
Programs: US/AA-Platinum, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, AVIS-Presidents Club, National-Executive Elite
Posts: 2,755
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
Agreed. I see no reason to think she was a danger to anyone. The only threat is if some bad guy found the gun and that's not likely.
This is the same ridiculous argument that "law-abiding citizens" shouldnt have to subject themselves to additional rules.

She's a good guy until she turns into a bad guy.

Everyone is a law-abiding citizens until they arent.

How would you know she wasnt a bad guy? Just because in hindsight, nothing happened? We have no idea what her real intentions are.
bkafrick is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 3:39 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,461
Originally Posted by cwe84
US Airways F/As can use Known Crew Member to enter the airport....
And here's our big issue.

WHY are these folks trusted????

WHY am I subject to harassment and these "law abiding citizens" get to bring on banned things???

WHY!
Orange County Commuter is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 4:03 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SYR
Programs: US/AA-Platinum, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, AVIS-Presidents Club, National-Executive Elite
Posts: 2,755
Originally Posted by OrangeCountyCommuter
And here's our big issue.

WHY are these folks trusted????
The program expedites flight-crew member access to sterile areas of airports, reduces passenger-screening line congestion, enhances security, and makes airport checkpoint screening more efficient for all who depend on air transportation.
Source: http://www.knowncrewmember.org/Pages/Home.aspx

Bottom line, the ALPA (i.e. Pilots Union) wanted to make it easier for their members to get through security. So they came up with a program, lobbied for it, and got it.
bkafrick is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 4:04 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,967
Originally Posted by bkafrick
The program expedites flight-crew member access to sterile areas of airports, reduces passenger-screening line congestion, enhances security, and makes airport checkpoint screening more efficient for all who depend on air transportation.
Source: http://www.knowncrewmember.org/Pages/Home.aspx
The program resulted in her bringing the gun into the US airport, on board an aircraft, and around Rome.

How does that enhance security?
exbayern is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2013, 4:05 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SYR
Programs: US/AA-Platinum, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, AVIS-Presidents Club, National-Executive Elite
Posts: 2,755
Originally Posted by exbayern
The program resulted in her bringing the gun into the US airport, on board an aircraft, and around Rome.

How does that enhance security?
Well, obviously that quote is "union speak".
bkafrick is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.