Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Live, Interesting Seat Recline dispute, what would you do?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:03 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Originally Posted by beofotch
I am currently flying CLT – LAX on a US Airways A321. I am in seat 3D and once I began working on my laptop I reclined my seat. Within a few minutes of this, the passenger in 4D turned her air vent on my head, presumably to protest me having my seat reclined.

I summoned the flight attendant and asked him to ask the passenger behind me to take her air vent off my head. He asked her and she complied. About fifteen minutes later, the passenger in 4D got my attention and said, “if you continue to shove your head into my lap, I will turn my air vent back on you.” I replied, “what are you talking about?” She replied, “your seat is reclined too far, do you want to switch?” I responded, “no, this is my chosen seat”. I know that row 4 on the A321 doesn’t recline as far.

I then summoned the flight attendant again and noted to him what she had said to me and her threatening tone. She then spoke to him. He came to me and said, “She has taken her air vent off you, wouldn’t you be so kind as to not recline your seat? No other passengers are reclined.” I responded, “while I am working I want to have my seat reclined, I don’t see why this is a problem. I am 6’ 4” and fly enough to be a Dividend Miles Platinum and this has never been an issue in the past.” He responded, “well in that case I can’t stop her from putting her air vent on your head.”. I replied, “if she continues to do that, I will get out my camera phone and take her picture and post it on flyertalk.com and note that this is a passenger who puts her air vent on other passengers.” He paused for a moment and said, “if you take a picture of her, I will have the police meet this flight in Los Angeles.”

At this point, I continue to work (save for writing this post), and she continues to have her air vent on my head. I will wait to take her picture until I am finished with my work. I believe it is totally within my right to take a picture of other people in public (but I could be wrong, I am not an attorney). Also, note that as far as I can tell, she does not have any sort of medical condition or injury. I would be more inclined to suck it up if she were injured. Neither she nor the flight attendant noted she had any condition.

Have you had similar frustrating discourse with other passengers? So my question for you is, what would you do?
Recline all the way to work on your laptop? SMH.
samgvb is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:06 pm
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by dcpatti
True, but consider this: raising the window shade is also using the item's designed capabilities, but the resultant glare can be problematic to those around you, and can make it more difficult for them to enjoy their flight.
Which is why those people for whom this is an issue should book window seats. The only time an objection to an open shade is valid is if the sun is shining directly into someone's face.

I'm not trying to rehash the recline-or-not debate, nor the shades-up-or-down debate, only trying to demonstrate that the close quarters of an airplane mean that *even when using something as it is designed,* there is a potentially negative impact for your neighbor. That's just what happens when you cram 200 people into an airplane. Even the way you stow your bag in the bin (do you just throw it up there, or do you arrange it in an attempt to conserve space for others?) has an impact on others. If all the passengers were courteous and thought about the impact of their actions on others, then travel wouldn't be the complete slog that it can be sometimes.
Or, quite simply, all passengers should understand that flying involves some discomfort, and they do not get to minimize their own by usurping amenities provided to others.

And I think we all agree that Air Vent Lady was out of line, and "started" the problem, but that does not give the OP permission to throw fuel onto the fire. The threat of taking the other passenger's picture, the status-dropping, the warning of flyertalk postings, all add up to a hostile gesture whether or not one considers the involvement of the FA as equally hostile.
I agree with you -- I think the threat of retaliation, and the nature of the threatened retaliation, was as childish as the air-vent lady. As I indicated, my approach would be to ask nicely once, and then call over the FA. If the FA refused to assist, I would ask for the senior or purser and, in some circumstances, the pilot. After deplaning, I would write a letter to airline, complaining about the specific FA by name.

Simply put: just because the other person is being a jerk doesn't make it OK for you to also be a jerk. It's as true on a plane as it is anywhere else.
I agree, completely. However, just because the other person is being a jerk doesn't mean that you should simply accept the imposition. There are adult and responsible ways of addressing it.
PTravel is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:21 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Originally Posted by PTravel
Using the capabilities of a seat given to you by the airline is not an imposition. Demanding that someone refrain from doing so is.

Sorry, but, no -- that is not an imposition. If you are dissatisfied with the amount of space allotted to you by the airline, you have alternatives: book F, book exit row or book bulkhead. Demanding that the person in front of you not use the space allocated to him by the airline is no different than the Passenger of Size demanding that you surrender part of your seat to him. Neither have any claim to space allocated by the airline to someone else.

And, if asked nicely, I might, depending on the circumstances. However, if I am experiencing my fairly chronic neck pain, I will not. Sorry, but I've seen to my needs by ensuring that I booked a seat for which the airline has allocated me recline space. I will not subject myself to pain and discomfort because you did not see to your own seating needs and, instead, have determined that you have some sort of moral claim to my space.

Speaking personally, you'd be doing me a favor. I'm always too warm on flights and would love an additional air vent blowing on me; when there is no one in the seat beside me, I always direct that air vent towards me as well. However, if, for some reason, your doing so discomfited me, I would ask you nicely to redirect it. If you refused, I would pursue the course of action I recommended to the OP, above.

Directing it to blow on someone else does nothing to increase your own comfort, and is childish and petty. There is no comparison, and I'm sure you are aware of that.

Try that explanation with the FA, purser/senior or, if necessary, pilot and see how far it gets you.
Again, FTR, I personally don't have an issue with people reclining their seat. I just find it odd that people would defend reclining the seat but not defend using the air vent. Both are there for the passengers' comfort. I don't like the air vent blowing on my face because it bothers my contact lenses. So when I have the vent on it is pointed more towards my legs. In the OP's case, on US's A321 in F, the seats do tend to recline into what seems/feels like the person behind's lap. In this case, if you are reclined you may feel my air vent on you.

If I nudge that air vent more towards you because I don't like that you reclined, then yes, I'm being childish but good luck demonstrating that I'm doing anything different than someone that chooses to recline. I could move the vent a little and the person in front could move their seat a little. Why is your neck/back pain more important than my eye discomfort?

I certainly wouldn't demand anything of anyone and never said I would. Quite the opposite. I agree with everyone here that has said we should act like adults, respect each other, and try to get along.
justhere is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:23 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Purgatory
Programs: Too many to list. Status is a half dozen.
Posts: 9,235
Wow. We're still discussing this? How many FT threads have been created on this very topic and discussed ad nauseum?
ArizonaGuy is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:30 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Originally Posted by beltway
That's like arguing that it's OK to repeatedly kick the seat in front of you because it makes you more comfortable.
I disagree that it's like arguing that but I do agree that the actions are similar. Both are annoying. The difference is it is easy to demonstrate that someone is kicking my seat. Not so easy to demonstrate that the position I have the air vent in is designed to tick you off. Plus kicking the seat is a physical action on my part. I can't help it if the air vent blows into our shared space. And yes, for those of you claiming "eminent domain"* to "your" space, some of it is shared. After all, once you recline your seat is in the space I used to get into my seat and I need that space to get out of my seat.

After all, it's not like the air vents are pumping out that much air and they certainly do have a limit to their range of movement.

* - yes I know that's not what eminent domain is but it sounded good when I wrote it.
justhere is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:40 pm
  #51  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: AA ExPlat, Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,551
What was the conclusion of the past threads?

My take is that people approach airline seat reclining from two differing, in-conflict premises in mind:
The first is that you should have the right to be reclined as you wish as it is your space.

The other is that you should not recline your seat as it impacts the space of those behind you.
Depending which premise you subscribe, impacts your answer when responding to a seat recline situation. Therefore one makes certain assumptions and approaches the issue from a different angle than others. One can be correct from both perspectives depending on which premise you start with (OK to recline/NOT OK to recline) that impacts the narrative and abstraction of the situation.

I subscribe to the it is OK to recline and don't complain when others recline narrative of the world. It is with this premise in mind this situation took place.

Originally Posted by ArizonaGuy
Wow. We're still discussing this? How many FT threads have been created on this very topic and discussed ad nauseum?
beofotch is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:44 pm
  #52  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: AA ExPlat, Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,551
Originally Posted by justhere
Not so easy to demonstrate that the position I have the air vent in is designed to tick you off.
In this particular case the air vent was not on me prior and once she choose to place it on me, as directly atop my head on full blast and at an angle that it was not hitting the passenger in seat 4D at all. I think the flight attendant was cognizant of this too.
beofotch is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:46 pm
  #53  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Originally Posted by justhere
Again, FTR, I personally don't have an issue with people reclining their seat. I just find it odd that people would defend reclining the seat but not defend using the air vent. Both are there for the passengers' comfort. I don't like the air vent blowing on my face because it bothers my contact lenses. So when I have the vent on it is pointed more towards my legs. In the OP's case, on US's A321 in F, the seats do tend to recline into what seems/feels like the person behind's lap. In this case, if you are reclined you may feel my air vent on you.
The difference is that the person who reclines is entitled to the space behind him and is using it for his own benefit, not to annoy the person behind them intentionally. Assuming the OP's post is accurate, and I see no reason to believe that it isn't, it is clear that Row 4 was using the vent simply to annoy the OP. If I felt that Row 4 was using the air vent for her own benefit and that the interference with the OP was incidental, then I would defend the use of the air vent.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:54 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Programs: US - Gold Preferred, leisuring and MRing for status :-)
Posts: 172
Originally Posted by masonuc
Haven't you followed the Republican party? Jesus would find all the gays on the plane and beat them up. Then he'd use his captive audience of middle and upper class passengers to hold a rally to cut taxes (because poor people suck and they are a drain on our tax dollars) and kick all the brown people out of Texas and Arizona by cutting off their healthcare and education.
^
wfdude is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:57 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Singaporean in YYZ
Programs: Aeroplan, AA, SPG Gold
Posts: 63
Originally Posted by davidl
Sorry, but I don't find either party's behavior appropriate. As a matter of consideration for other passengers, the only time I recline a seat is when I am flying trans-Atlantic in business class (and I am 6' 1", so I am not short, but also not as tall as the OP). Even on a red-eye in coach, I will sleep with my seat fully upright.

The OP wanted to recline his seat so he could work. I don't think I saw any indication of what the person in back was trying to do, but even in 1st class on the 321, the OP's recline might have made it very difficult for the person in back to use her laptop, depending on how far back the OP reclined his seat.

While I don't expect other people to view the world the way I do, I would hope for a higher degree of consideration for other passengers for both the OP and the person in back of him. Some mutual respect would go a long way, especially as airlines take more and more space out of their aircraft.

Regards,

David
Right on... "mutual respect" sadly is very lacking in our modern society with people always clinging on to their "entitlements".

At the end of the day, we are all human beings who want to be treated with respect... Sometimes, it doesn't hurt to be the bigger person, when the other person is being childish, and just live and let live, instead of always having to be "right" and to win.
Woofy is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 2:59 pm
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by justhere
If I nudge that air vent more towards you because I don't like that you reclined, then yes, I'm being childish but good luck demonstrating that I'm doing anything different than someone that chooses to recline. I could move the vent a little and the person in front could move their seat a little. Why is your neck/back pain more important than my eye discomfort?
It's not. Why do you have the vent on at all? I really don't understand. I can see how having the vent blow directly on you will cause problems for your contact lenses. I don't see how having the vent blow somewhere else provides any benefit to you.
PTravel is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 3:17 pm
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
Originally Posted by beofotch
He paused for a moment and said, “if you take a picture of her, I will have the police meet this flight in Los Angeles.
Yet another FA making up their own rules, and backing them up with threats.



Originally Posted by cwe84
To be honest if I was the F/A on that flight. I would look at you both and say " You two are grown adults in the First class cabin, GROW UP" and I would walk away.
^

Originally Posted by RX_Flyertalk
Yes - I have had similar situations and I would continue to direct my air vent towards the inconsiderate person in front of me .....
Welcome to FlyerTalk! Were you sitting in 4D earlier today?
N965VJ is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 3:20 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Originally Posted by PTravel
It's not. Why do you have the vent on at all? I really don't understand. I can see how having the vent blow directly on you will cause problems for your contact lenses. I don't see how having the vent blow somewhere else provides any benefit to you.
And you are free to not see that but I like the vent on to provide a little more air circulation and I can feel it on my legs (normally wearing shorts when I fly).

Originally Posted by mikeef
The difference is that the person who reclines is entitled to the space behind him and is using it for his own benefit, not to annoy the person behind them intentionally. Assuming the OP's post is accurate, and I see no reason to believe that it isn't, it is clear that Row 4 was using the vent simply to annoy the OP. If I felt that Row 4 was using the air vent for her own benefit and that the interference with the OP was incidental, then I would defend the use of the air vent.

Mike
It's that entitlement thing that is so divisive. My point was simply that if after I've asked nicely (which I've never done BTW [asked, that is - if I did ask I would do it nicely] but I can understand why someone might), and the person then intentionally doesn't want to give an inch, I might act like a child and point my air vent at them.
justhere is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 3:28 pm
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by justhere
And you are free to not see that but I like the vent on to provide a little more air circulation and I can feel it on my legs (normally wearing shorts when I fly).
Okay, that makes sense -- I thought you were just being spiteful. In that case, feel free to "vent away" at your legs. As you note, it's an amenity that the airline provides you, so I have no problem with you using it, even if it results in some discomfort to me.

It's that entitlement thing that is so divisive. My point was simply that if after I've asked nicely (which I've never done BTW [asked, that is - if I did ask I would do it nicely] but I can understand why someone might), and the person then intentionally doesn't want to give an inch, I might act like a child and point my air vent at them.
If you asked me nicely, I might intentionally not want to give an inch. Nor should I have to, just as you should not have to move your air vent because the flow of air against your legs makes you more comfortable.

And that's the whole point. If you ask me for a favor I have a right to say, "no." And vice versa. I might ask you about the air vent. If you said, "I prefer the air flow against my legs," or even just, "sorry, but I prefer it this way," I'd say, "Oh, okay, no problem." And that would be the end of it. I wouldn't look for a way to retaliate nor, for that matter, would I think there was any reason for retaliation.
PTravel is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 3:37 pm
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,342
Originally Posted by cwe84
To be honest if I was the F/A on that flight. I would look at you both and say " You two are grown adults in the First class cabin, GROW UP" and I would walk away. F/A's are not there to settle your little squabbles. Next thing you know we get involved in the "nuh uhn" and "hes touching me" BS..... I bet one of you two stamped your foot too didn't you.... God knows F/A's have much better things to do than be your mother.
Spot on. But I am not sure about "grown adults" in this case.
Silver Fox is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.