New US Star Alliance/Partner Award Charts Released - Effective 1/6/10
#31
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: High Point, NC
Programs: None
Posts: 9,171
Just scanning through it, what struck me was that most of the green in US' column was for J/F class (with some Y thrown in for Europe-Caribbean and areas US doesn't serve). A recognition that many people redeeming for J/F where US offers service are choosing other carriers, perhaps?
Jim
#32
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: A lovely little town filled with cows
Programs: US2, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,284
It's there - the last item in the North America origin section.
Just scanning through it, what struck me was that most of the green in US' column was for J/F class (with some Y thrown in for Europe-Caribbean and areas US doesn't serve). A recognition that many people redeeming for J/F where US offers service are choosing other carriers, perhaps?
Jim
Just scanning through it, what struck me was that most of the green in US' column was for J/F class (with some Y thrown in for Europe-Caribbean and areas US doesn't serve). A recognition that many people redeeming for J/F where US offers service are choosing other carriers, perhaps?
Jim
I'm not sure I'd agree that most of the green is for J/F. In fact, US is favorable or at least competitive (not more expensive) in almost every class of service across every route with the notable exception of the Middle East and North Asia to South Asia (which, in fairness, would compare favorably if you tried to get a UA/CO itinerary from Japan to anywhere in Asia due to how the three carriers define their regions). They are also uncompetitive with RTW itineraries when compared to CO, but CO is the outlier here and the rest of the alliance seems to have standardized on 200/300/400.
I'd assume that most of US' customers redeem for coach awards, whether for domestic or international travel, and that US figured a small increase (miles-wise, not necessarily percentage-wise) would go unnoticed or at least unchallenged while reducing more liability.
On second read, perhaps this is what you were saying?
#33
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: High Point, NC
Programs: None
Posts: 9,171
Sorry - hit the "Submit" button half way through typing this up....
Just looking at the green for Y - where US is the least expensive - I get:
N. America to/from N. Asia (US doesn't serve)
N. America to/from Africa (US doesn't serve)
Europe to/from Caribbean (US does serve)
Europe to/from S. America (US is about to offer one flight)
Europe to/from N. & S. Asia (US doesn't serve)
Europe to/from S. Pac (US doesn't serve)
N. Asia to/from C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
S. Asia to/from C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
Within C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
So one that US serves is less expensive in Y on US.
Compare this to where US is less expensive for J and/or F:
Within N. America (US serves)
N. America / HI (US serves)
N. America / Caribbean (US serves)
N. America / S. America (US will have one flight)
N. America / Europe (US serves)
N. America / N. & C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
N. America / S. Pac (US doesn't serve)
N. America / Africa (US doesn't serve)
Europe / HI (US serves)
Europe / Caribbean (US serves)
Europe / S. America (US will have one flight)
Europe / N., C., & S Asia (US doesn't serve)
Europe / S. Pac (US doesn't serve)
Europe / Africa (US doesn't serve)
N Asia / S & C Asia (US doesn't serve)
N Asia / S Pac (US doesn't serve)
S Asia / S & C Asia (US doesn't serve)
C Asia / S Asia & S Pac (US doesn't serve)
S Pac / S Pac (US doesn't serve)
6 areas where US serves are less expensive on US in J and/or F (7 if you count S America).
I was suggesting that US may recognize that it's J product may not be up to the standards of OAL's (especially foreign based) and is discounting it's own J cabin to get some award bookings back that would otherwise gone to those OALs, at least for part of the itinerary where possible. Note that on the second list everything down to Europe/Africa (about 2/3 of the list) can be at least partially flown on US even if for some of them it would be the long way around.
It's also worth noting that US incurs less cost (or more income from other FF programs) if people fly US instead of OALs, making it worth while to charge fewer miles if it gets more people to use US at least part of their award travel.
Jim
Just looking at the green for Y - where US is the least expensive - I get:
N. America to/from N. Asia (US doesn't serve)
N. America to/from Africa (US doesn't serve)
Europe to/from Caribbean (US does serve)
Europe to/from S. America (US is about to offer one flight)
Europe to/from N. & S. Asia (US doesn't serve)
Europe to/from S. Pac (US doesn't serve)
N. Asia to/from C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
S. Asia to/from C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
Within C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
So one that US serves is less expensive in Y on US.
Compare this to where US is less expensive for J and/or F:
Within N. America (US serves)
N. America / HI (US serves)
N. America / Caribbean (US serves)
N. America / S. America (US will have one flight)
N. America / Europe (US serves)
N. America / N. & C. Asia (US doesn't serve)
N. America / S. Pac (US doesn't serve)
N. America / Africa (US doesn't serve)
Europe / HI (US serves)
Europe / Caribbean (US serves)
Europe / S. America (US will have one flight)
Europe / N., C., & S Asia (US doesn't serve)
Europe / S. Pac (US doesn't serve)
Europe / Africa (US doesn't serve)
N Asia / S & C Asia (US doesn't serve)
N Asia / S Pac (US doesn't serve)
S Asia / S & C Asia (US doesn't serve)
C Asia / S Asia & S Pac (US doesn't serve)
S Pac / S Pac (US doesn't serve)
6 areas where US serves are less expensive on US in J and/or F (7 if you count S America).
I was suggesting that US may recognize that it's J product may not be up to the standards of OAL's (especially foreign based) and is discounting it's own J cabin to get some award bookings back that would otherwise gone to those OALs, at least for part of the itinerary where possible. Note that on the second list everything down to Europe/Africa (about 2/3 of the list) can be at least partially flown on US even if for some of them it would be the long way around.
It's also worth noting that US incurs less cost (or more income from other FF programs) if people fly US instead of OALs, making it worth while to charge fewer miles if it gets more people to use US at least part of their award travel.
Jim
Last edited by BoeingBoy; Dec 5, 2009 at 11:48 pm
#34
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: RIC
Programs: US CP, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Plat, *wood Gold, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,600
CO C -- 57.92
UA C -- 59.17
US C -- 60.00
US J -- 95.00
CO J -- 99.17
UA J -- 102.92
US F -- 121.25
CO F -- 127.08
UA F -- 130.83
It is obviously an extremely crude way to look at things, but it does to result in ranking the charts as US > CO >> UA which is true. Just using a simple average is a bit misleading since certain routings are obviously much more likely to be used than others, but I can't think of a better proposal at the moment.
Sorry about missing the RTW award on your chart. Attention to detail is not my strong suit.
#35
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: A lovely little town filled with cows
Programs: US2, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,284
Yeah, that's it. For instance the average value on awards leaving from North America (excluding the RTW) is:
CO C -- 57.92
UA C -- 59.17
US C -- 60.00
US J -- 95.00
CO J -- 99.17
UA J -- 102.92
US F -- 121.25
CO F -- 127.08
UA F -- 130.83
It is obviously an extremely crude way to look at things, but it does to result in ranking the charts as US > CO >> UA which is true. Just using a simple average is a bit misleading since certain routings are obviously much more likely to be used than others, but I can't think of a better proposal at the moment.
Sorry about missing the RTW award on your chart. Attention to detail is not my strong suit.
CO C -- 57.92
UA C -- 59.17
US C -- 60.00
US J -- 95.00
CO J -- 99.17
UA J -- 102.92
US F -- 121.25
CO F -- 127.08
UA F -- 130.83
It is obviously an extremely crude way to look at things, but it does to result in ranking the charts as US > CO >> UA which is true. Just using a simple average is a bit misleading since certain routings are obviously much more likely to be used than others, but I can't think of a better proposal at the moment.
Sorry about missing the RTW award on your chart. Attention to detail is not my strong suit.
As to attention to detail - not my forte either, as you can see from looking through the various promo threads here and seeing my many "doh!" moments.
#36
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: RIC
Programs: US CP, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Plat, *wood Gold, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,600
Jim:
I didn't know that. Please tell me that (I'm guessing this because of the codeshare thing) the city served will be Lima. That will save me a lot of miles because the only South American city I really need an award to is Lima and the increases in the new chart were really bumming me out, since I'm going to need 4 of those.
I didn't know that. Please tell me that (I'm guessing this because of the codeshare thing) the city served will be Lima. That will save me a lot of miles because the only South American city I really need an award to is Lima and the increases in the new chart were really bumming me out, since I'm going to need 4 of those.
#37
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: A lovely little town filled with cows
Programs: US2, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,284
Jim:
I didn't know that. Please tell me that (I'm guessing this because of the codeshare thing) the city served will be Lima. That will save me a lot of miles because the only South American city I really need an award to is Lima and the increases in the new chart were really bumming me out, since I'm going to need 4 of those.
I didn't know that. Please tell me that (I'm guessing this because of the codeshare thing) the city served will be Lima. That will save me a lot of miles because the only South American city I really need an award to is Lima and the increases in the new chart were really bumming me out, since I'm going to need 4 of those.
Last edited by vysean; Dec 6, 2009 at 12:14 am
#38
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: High Point, NC
Programs: None
Posts: 9,171
CLT - GIG (Rio) starts on the 15th I believe. It will be a 767 with same flight number service to PHL (767 PHL-CLt and A320 family CLT-PHL). That will tie into the new codeshare with TACA - I understand their hub is in Rio.
Jim
Jim
#39
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: RIC
Programs: US CP, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Plat, *wood Gold, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,600
* The hub at Jorge Chavez International Airport is in charge of all connections to the South American routes and serves El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala and Havana.
LIM-GUA/ LIM-SAL/ LIM-SJO/ LIM-HAV/ LIM-BOG/ LIM-MDE/ LIM-CCS/ LIM-UIO/ LIM-GYE/ LIM-CUZ/ LIM-GIG/ LIM-GRU/ LIM-LPB-VIV/ LIM-ASU/ LIM-MVD/ LIM-EZE/ LIM-SCL/
LIM-GUA/ LIM-SAL/ LIM-SJO/ LIM-HAV/ LIM-BOG/ LIM-MDE/ LIM-CCS/ LIM-UIO/ LIM-GYE/ LIM-CUZ/ LIM-GIG/ LIM-GRU/ LIM-LPB-VIV/ LIM-ASU/ LIM-MVD/ LIM-EZE/ LIM-SCL/
#40
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: High Point, NC
Programs: None
Posts: 9,171
My mistake about TACA's hub...something in the intra-company communications about increased connecting opportunities in S America caused me to assume Rio was their hub.
Jim
Jim
#41
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SFO/SJC, CA
Posts: 630
I know it's going to come and it seems not too bad.
At least we can plan well for current "US partner promotion" without worry the mileage requrement change.
At least we can plan well for current "US partner promotion" without worry the mileage requrement change.
#42
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: AA, UA, SQ, VA, QF, AF, BA
Posts: 2,865
This award is the whole reason we are in US DM so very relieved the C class stayed the same. We just returned from a BNE-PPT trip in Y and the BNE-AKL segments were in a 3-4-3 configuration which was very uncomfortable. Thanks to Grand Slam, the nest trip to RAR will be in C!
#43
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: SIN
Programs: UA Platinum, DL Platinum, AFKL Gold, Qatar Gold
Posts: 895
Wow, excellent news! No change for North Asia to Europe and North America in First Class.
I am going to buy/share 500,000 miles before the end of current promotion. 1,500$US for First class trip from Hong Kong to Canada with a stopover in Switzerland, I want lots of them!
I am going to buy/share 500,000 miles before the end of current promotion. 1,500$US for First class trip from Hong Kong to Canada with a stopover in Switzerland, I want lots of them!
#44
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BOS
Programs: Marriott LTG, HHonors Diamond, Nat'l Exec
Posts: 3,581
This is a big relief. Not sure why I would fly TATL in Envoy via PHL or CLT when I can use LX or LH, so it means the new US-metal rates are essentially meaningless.
#45
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Purgatory
Programs: Too many to list. Status is a half dozen.
Posts: 9,235
Because the hard product is improving, however slowly. There's a thread with pics on the new Envoy suites. Soft product was still same old, same old. If you can get the new hard product, save the $50 award processing fee and 5K miles via the credit card benefit (DM Select), it might sway you. If not you, certainly some others.