Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Embraer 170

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2003, 3:52 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tampa,FL,USA
Programs: CO Platinum, Starwood Platinum, Hyatt Diamond, Hertz Presidents
Posts: 60
Embraer 170

Was chatting with a pilot on a flight to somewhere about a month ago. He told me that US pilots were training on this aircraft. It is a full size RJ with large overhaeds and a FC cabin. US has an order for 85 planes...Is this the future of the RJ?? Could this plane be the savior for US?
dontsaystewardess is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 5:14 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: AVL
Programs: AA EXP ; Cunard Plat
Posts: 4,211
According to the May press release
http://www.usairways.com/about/press/nw_03_0512.htm
they also got a great deal.

As someone who flies frequently from a small airport, I'm looking forward to the arrival of the Embraer 170s starting November. Soon, there'd be no more need for plane-side check-in of carry-on bag, and FC availability in a RJ is a nice touch!
kudzu is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 7:28 am
  #3  
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,579
I would consider the Embraer 170/175/190/195 family as much an RJ as the DC-9, Boeing 717, and Fokker 100 ... the 190/195 are in the same league as all of those while the 170/175 is a scaled down version ... the only relationship to what most folks consider an "RJ" and the new Embraers is 2-2 seating, which in a decent size cabin is actually a great plus (no middle seat!).

Embraer homepage for EMB-170
Beckles is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 10:19 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
There are rumors (unconfirmed thus far) that the EMB-170s might not be coming equipped with FC.

I think US would be nuts not to, but the folks at CCY never cease to amaze me with some of their antics.

It does look like a "small jet" as opposed to a "lawn dart with turbofans," tho. We'll have to wait and see what the final product looks like.

------------------
Don't feed the trolls.
ClueByFour is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 11:47 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: TLL
Programs: OZ Diamond, BA Gold, Bonvoy Ambassador, HH Gold
Posts: 4,410
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ClueByFour:
There are rumors (unconfirmed thus far) that the EMB-170s might not be coming equipped with FC.

I think US would be nuts not to, but the folks at CCY never cease to amaze me with some of their antics.

It does look like a "small jet" as opposed to a "lawn dart with turbofans," tho. We'll have to wait and see what the final product looks like.

</font>
I was about to ask which configuration US had ordered. The configurations that they have listed on the site kinda shock me - 70 seats at 32" pitch, 78 seats at 31" pitch - does one inch of pitch really make that big of a diference?

I somehow doubt they'll be coming with F cabins.
dcmike is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 12:20 pm
  #6  
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,579
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by dcmike:
I somehow doubt they'll be coming with F cabins.</font>
Seeing that US stated in the press release (linked above) that the 70 seaters from Bombardier and Embraer both would be two-class aircraft, I think they probably will have F cabins.
Beckles is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 1:35 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by dcmike:
I was about to ask which configuration US had ordered. The configurations that they have listed on the site kinda shock me - 70 seats at 32" pitch, 78 seats at 31" pitch - does one inch of pitch really make that big of a diference?</font>
Sure. About 70" worth, which at 31-32" of pitch, leaves enough for 2 more rows (of 2x2 seating). Ergo, you go from 70 to 78 seats.

I hope they come with an F cabin.

I'll wait until I (or one of my fellow cockroaches) actually sits in one of these F seats before declaring victory.


------------------
Don't feed the trolls.
ClueByFour is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 1:59 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gorham, Maine, USA
Programs: Delta Gold, UA Platinum
Posts: 193
We will see how good these planes really are in practice. They've already had a certification delay, and the 717 will still hold about 15 more people than the biggest one, the 195, in comparable seating configurations. 717's (and maybe DC-9's) will still be flying when these things have already started going into the recycling bin if they are built as disposables like the ERJ's currenly flying.
veliger is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 2:33 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 30,989
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ClueByFour:
Sure. About 70" worth, which at 31-32" of pitch, leaves enough for 2 more rows (of 2x2 seating). Ergo, you go from 70 to 78 seats.

</font>
Since it's 70 seats, not 70 rows, taking out 1" would only free up about 18". I'm not sure how they get 2 more rows freeing up 18".
CPRich is online now  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 2:49 pm
  #10  
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,579
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by CPRich:
Since it's 70 seats, not 70 rows, taking out 1" would only free up about 18". I'm not sure how they get 2 more rows freeing up 18".</font>
Just look at the Embraer website, the 78 seat configuration removes part of the galley and a closet, it's not just about seats the differenced between the 70 and 78 seat configurations.
Beckles is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2003, 3:02 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by CPRich:
Since it's 70 seats, not 70 rows, taking out 1" would only free up about 18". I'm not sure how they get 2 more rows freeing up 18".</font>

Gack. Complete mental block on my part. As Tom mentions, you don't need a huge galley for 78 coach seats (since hot food won't be served) or a closet (since you don't need to hang Y pax coats).

------------------
Don't feed the trolls.
ClueByFour is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2003, 6:01 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: TLL
Programs: OZ Diamond, BA Gold, Bonvoy Ambassador, HH Gold
Posts: 4,410
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Beckles:
Seeing that US stated in the press release (linked above) that the 70 seaters from Bombardier and Embraer both would be two-class aircraft, I think they probably will have F cabins.</font>

I sit corrected! DOH!
dcmike is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.