UA wants agents to pay credit card fees
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IL USA
Programs: UA 1.55MM Lifetime Premier Gold, AA Exec. Plt., NW MM(875K on DL), MC Gold, HH Diamond, SPG, HY GP
Posts: 205
More cost savings
A travel agent friend of mine received an industry e-mail publication stating that United was going to stop accepting credit card payments from some agencies so they could save some money. Are things THAT bad at United? They just started taking credit cards only for BOB and BEV (buy on board and adult beverages). Is there cause for concern?
http://www.btnonline.com/businesstra..._id=1003987948
http://www.btnonline.com/businesstra..._id=1003987948
#2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Programs: UA 1K, AA Plat, SPG Platinum, National Executive
Posts: 1,970
It makes perfect sense to me. If the ticket is not bought from United, why should United have to have to pay the CC fees?
#3
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1K 1.45MM, Marriott+SPG Plat, Clear, Nexus, Global Entry and MEX Viajero Confiable
Posts: 1,777
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,919
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IL USA
Programs: UA 1.55MM Lifetime Premier Gold, AA Exec. Plt., NW MM(875K on DL), MC Gold, HH Diamond, SPG, HY GP
Posts: 205
The question isn't whether to or not to do anything. I simply wonder how bad things are at United. Should we be worried? This announcement comes the same week as they are furloughing more flight attendants.
Last edited by JoeTravel; Jun 25, 2009 at 6:33 pm Reason: misspelled word
#6
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Because if someone is always using a certain TA and has a credit card doesn't have the need to be absolutely loyal to UA, they will react in an obvious way.
#7
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pasadena, Ca. USA
Programs: UA 1P, AA Plat, Hertz 5*, Avis First, SPG Plat, Hyatt Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 326
UA has been looking at ways to reduce its CC processing fees for years. That's part of the reason for the push for the Chase UA card, not only is the bank buying miles but its also charging UA less for processing. I wonder what TAs are being forced to make this change? I suspect its a lot of the small to medium sized account with a lower portion of premium traffic. In fact there are a lot of travel agencies that do not sell any profitable business with UA, take the extra ~1% credit card fee into account and these agencies are even bigger money losers. I suspect the accounts targeted are those that are not UA contracted TAs so the impact to UA customers will be limited.
This is nothing but good news. UA is making the tough decisions to make itself into a carrier that can survive this down turn. I'm sure they are making some enemies in some TA ranks but imagine the savings on spend of a couple hundred million dollars.
This is nothing but good news. UA is making the tough decisions to make itself into a carrier that can survive this down turn. I'm sure they are making some enemies in some TA ranks but imagine the savings on spend of a couple hundred million dollars.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,919
#10
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MEM
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 253
Also, I don't see any difference for UA between booking through an agent (but charged directly by UA) and using .bomb.
#12
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MEM
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 253
I still did not get the point. The amount I paid is the same as the one I should pay if I book on .bomb. UA charged my credit card directly. Any difference to UA? I am paying the agent fee instead of UA paying commission.
#13
Join Date: Oct 2008
Programs: UA 1K, AA Plat, SPG Platinum, National Executive
Posts: 1,970
When you used your TA, instead of them charging you and paying the CC fees, they charged you on behalf of United, once again making United pay the CC fees, even though they are not the ones who issued the ticket.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,217
It costs merchant's fees when you use a credit card. When you purchase FROM .bomb (aka United), United charges you and United pays the CC fees.
When you used your TA, instead of them charging you and paying the CC fees, they charged you on behalf of United, once again making United pay the CC fees, even though they are not the ones who issued the ticket.
When you used your TA, instead of them charging you and paying the CC fees, they charged you on behalf of United, once again making United pay the CC fees, even though they are not the ones who issued the ticket.
Seems to me like a good way for UA to lose a few more customers who get pushed by their TA to a different airline. Then again I'm not one of the experts who have so expertly guided UA into its current state of affairs so what do I know. In the current environment finding ways to reduce ease of purchase of your product by consumers is absolutely genius...what will they think of next?
#15
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MEM
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 253
It costs merchant's fees when you use a credit card. When you purchase FROM .bomb (aka United), United charges you and United pays the CC fees.
When you used your TA, instead of them charging you and paying the CC fees, they charged you on behalf of United, once again making United pay the CC fees, even though they are not the ones who issued the ticket.
When you used your TA, instead of them charging you and paying the CC fees, they charged you on behalf of United, once again making United pay the CC fees, even though they are not the ones who issued the ticket.