Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Status of UA's 777 Conversion to new International First, Business and Economy Seats

Status of UA's 777 Conversion to new International First, Business and Economy Seats

 
Old Nov 2, 10, 2:35 pm
  #1306  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Orange County, CA
Programs: Wouldn't you like to know?!
Posts: 23,822
Originally Posted by robyng
I'm glad you have a strong opinion. Perhaps you can help me . I am trying to book a businessfirst flight (using Continental Miles) from somewhere in North America to Shanghai. My closest airport is JAX - but I can fly from MCO. At this point I'm looking at the cities where I'll leave for Shanghai. Pretty much it's Chicago or Toronto - on United or Air Canada (none of the Continental flights from EWR has a "cheap" FF option).

United uses the 777-200ER most of the time - and the 747-400 on some flights. Air Canada uses the 777-200LR. I haven't been on either airline in decades - and have never been on these planes as they're configured on these flights.

If you (or anyone else here) had a choice of which equipment to fly on - which would you choose? Note that it will be me and my husband - and neither of us has ever been on a "flat bed" airplane before (I in particular am looking forward to it because I'm a stomach sleeper). Thanks in advance. Robyn
Well, let me ask you this, do you mind connecting at all if you are able to get on a better airline? Or do you just want the shortest route? Also, first is just slightly more than business, are you willing to spend the additional miles for first?
BlissWorld is offline  
Old Nov 2, 10, 2:57 pm
  #1307  
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,669
Aren't there flights from IAD to PVG? And I know there is a flight from SFO to PVG! What's wrong with those choices?
RichardInSF is offline  
Old Nov 2, 10, 4:12 pm
  #1308  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Near Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,987
Hello again Richard (and pleased to meet the rest of you too). Continental does have good service from EWR and Houston to Shanghai (and those cities are non-stop from JAX). But they are super premium type flights in business class in terms of reward travel. 150,000 miles pp each way (if any reward tickets are available at all).

As for miles - I'm not flush. I have about 200,000 AMEX points that I won't be able to convert to Continental (where I also have some miles in the bank) after September next year (AMEX and Continental are parting ways). So I'm trying to squeeze at least 1 and possibly 2 business class tickets out of those points. Preferably to Asia - preferably to China (my husband and I have never been before). For some reason - Continental frequently has cheap partner business class rewards (before Continental and Delta parted ways - it was always "cheaper" to buy a business class ticket on Delta using Continental miles than going to Delta directly - don't have a clue why). Today - there are some flights to Shanghai on United through Chicago - and lots on Air Canada through Toronto. Only 125,000 miles PP RT.

As for San Francisco - I went through the math before when we went to Tokyo - about "going west" to get east. It takes us a full day with connecting flights to get to the west coast - and we don't save any time going to Asia because of the polar route. But I'll plug in SF as a gateway - and see what comes up.

In terms of connections - my husband reminded me today that he doesn't want to leave the car at the Orlando airport for a couple of weeks. So we'll be flying out of JAX. No way to avoid connections coming out of JAX . Ideally I'd like to get to "airport to Asia" - wherever that is - on day 1 - and go to Asia on day 2 (don't much care for waking up at 3 am - and that schedule worked out fine when we went to Japan). Robyn

P.S. To Richard and those of you I've spoken with before. I didn't fall off the face of the earth. This was just my year for 50,000 mile maintenance - a bunch of minor surgeries (2 planned - 1 unplanned) that had me out of commission and kept me close to home. It's nice to be making some travel plans again .
robyng is offline  
Old Nov 2, 10, 6:55 pm
  #1309  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brattleboro, VT
Posts: 705
Heard a rumor from a FA today that 777 conversions have been suspended. I was on UA 917 FRA-IAD. The FA told me that everything about the plane was in disrepair toilets, seats, entertainment, with no current plan to fix or update this particular plane, which he said was the first 777 rolled out by UA 15 years ago.

Could this be in response to a forthcoming decision of whether to continue with 3 cabins or convert to the CO model of just 2? I could see this rumor having some truth to it. What do you all think?
Brattflyer is offline  
Old Nov 2, 10, 6:57 pm
  #1310  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,061
Originally Posted by Brattflyer
Heard a rumor from a FA today that 777 conversions have been suspended. I was on UA 917 FRA-IAD. The FA told me that everything about the plane was in disrepair toilets, seats, entertainment, with no current plan to fix or update this particular plane, which he said was the first 777 rolled out by UA 15 years ago.

Could this be in response to a forthcoming decision of whether to continue with 3 cabins or convert to the CO model of just 2? I could see this rumor having some truth to it. What do you all think?
It could just be a rumor. FAs are known for them.. As I mentioned before, I would think that UA has some sort of contract with the companies doing the reconfig. Assuming that it's a standard contract, I would guess that there would be some penalties for suspending or canceling the work..
FriendlySkies is online now  
Old Nov 2, 10, 7:57 pm
  #1311  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
It could just be a rumor. FAs are known for them.. As I mentioned before, I would think that UA has some sort of contract with the companies doing the reconfig. Assuming that it's a standard contract, I would guess that there would be some penalties for suspending or canceling the work..
It could also be that it's old config and that plane will go in for refurb yet, so they aren't doing maintenance. Never know and FAs have been known to give out wrong info on occasion
GoingAway is offline  
Old Nov 2, 10, 8:20 pm
  #1312  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Taiwan
Programs: UA, CX, BR
Posts: 718
Originally Posted by robyng
...neither of us has ever been on a "flat bed" airplane before (I in particular am looking forward to it because I'm a stomach sleeper). Thanks in advance. Robyn
Just a little warning about this issue, from a fellow stomach sleeper. UA's flat seats are not good for stomach sleeping--at least I find--because you really feel the folding seams when the seat is flat. However, if you can modify your habits slightly to side sleeping or even semi-side sleeping, they are great.
taipeipeter is offline  
Old Nov 2, 10, 8:23 pm
  #1313  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.034MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 51,469
Originally Posted by Brattflyer
Heard a rumor from a FA today that 777 conversions have been suspended.
FA rumors are as reliable as political campaign ads (and we've certainly had enough of those).
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Nov 3, 10, 12:04 am
  #1314  
Moderator: United Airlines; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.9MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 63,168
Originally Posted by Brattflyer
Heard a rumor from a FA today that 777 conversions have been suspended. ...
personally I'm more inclined to trust this source
Originally Posted by planemechanic
Originally Posted by wripro
Did I miss something? Have they stopped converting the 777s?
No, they have not stopped.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Nov 3, 10, 9:08 am
  #1315  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Programs: UA 1K, UA MM, Hilton Gold, SPG lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Maker's Mark Ambassador
Posts: 158
Originally Posted by robyng
I'm glad you have a strong opinion. Perhaps you can help me . I am trying to book a businessfirst flight (using Continental Miles) from somewhere in North America to Shanghai. My closest airport is JAX - but I can fly from MCO. At this point I'm looking at the cities where I'll leave for Shanghai. Pretty much it's Chicago or Toronto - on United or Air Canada (none of the Continental flights from EWR has a "cheap" FF option).

United uses the 777-200ER most of the time - and the 747-400 on some flights. Air Canada uses the 777-200LR. I haven't been on either airline in decades - and have never been on these planes as they're configured on these flights.

If you (or anyone else here) had a choice of which equipment to fly on - which would you choose? Note that it will be me and my husband - and neither of us has ever been on a "flat bed" airplane before (I in particular am looking forward to it because I'm a stomach sleeper). Thanks in advance. Robyn
Another option, although it would likely require an extra connection, is AC via YVR. I flew to Shanghai on AC from vancouver a few months ago, and it was pretty good. In fact, I'd say the business class on AC overseas is the best of any north american carrier. Sounds like from your posts that you are willing to connect in a north american city and perhaps spend some time - Vancouver is much nicer than Toronto, in my opinion.

I am not sure how to hyperlink, but there is a thread in the CO summarizes some of the differences in business class on different airlines (http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/conti...ess-class.html) - See post 14 and 21.

Last edited by timg; Nov 3, 10 at 9:13 am Reason: spelling
timg is offline  
Old Nov 3, 10, 9:13 am
  #1316  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: United 1K, HH Diamond, CBP Global Entry
Posts: 732
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
Aren't there flights from IAD to PVG? And I know there is a flight from SFO to PVG! What's wrong with those choices?
no IAD-PVG flights. PVG flight on UA metal only originate from SFO, ORD currently, and LAX in near future. IAD only has IAD-PEK.
epiding is offline  
Old Nov 3, 10, 9:19 am
  #1317  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Starwood Gold
Posts: 126
Originally Posted by taipeipeter
Just a little warning about this issue, from a fellow stomach sleeper. UA's flat seats are not good for stomach sleeping--at least I find--because you really feel the folding seams when the seat is flat. However, if you can modify your habits slightly to side sleeping or even semi-side sleeping, they are great.
I am a stomach sleeper and find both the first and business seats to be quite comfortable for sleeping.
unrdchi is offline  
Old Nov 4, 10, 3:16 pm
  #1318  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Near Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,987
Originally Posted by timg
Another option, although it would likely require an extra connection, is AC via YVR. I flew to Shanghai on AC from vancouver a few months ago, and it was pretty good. In fact, I'd say the business class on AC overseas is the best of any north american carrier. Sounds like from your posts that you are willing to connect in a north american city and perhaps spend some time - Vancouver is much nicer than Toronto, in my opinion.

I am not sure how to hyperlink, but there is a thread in the CO summarizes some of the differences in business class on different airlines (http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/conti...ess-class.html) - See post 14 and 21.
Thanks for the idea. After checking lots of options - turns out Delta has perhaps the best flights/connections from JAX (through Detroit) - and some of the worst equipment. No reason to spend lots of miles on its "business class" (which doesn't look a lot better than economy class - especially since I've seen RT flights at less than $900 in economy class). The carriers with the nicest looking equipment (like AC) don't have bad flights - they're just long trips. Like spending Day 1 from JAX to YVR - then day 2 to Shanghai - arriving on Day 3. The latter is what we did to Japan - and it was tough. Note that we do like Vancouver - a lot. Perhaps we'll just end our trip in Vancouver and call it a day . Robyn
robyng is offline  
Old Nov 4, 10, 4:46 pm
  #1319  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Blair and Brown's Broken Britain
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 19,853
I don't know about the status but I do know that my flight on Saturday has switched 777's 3 times now and leaves me on tenterhooks that I will get my preferred seat. Getting rather annoying now.
Silver Fox is offline  
Old Nov 4, 10, 5:02 pm
  #1320  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K/MM, AA GLD
Posts: 1,702
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
I don't know about the status but I do know that my flight on Saturday has switched 777's 3 times now and leaves me on tenterhooks that I will get my preferred seat. Getting rather annoying now.
I was booking a flight to LHR and had the choice of routing through ORD or IAD; one of the IAD-LHR options had the new seatmap loaded and NC space available. It's far enough out that the likelihood of having new seats is pretty high considering how far along the refits will be, but I ended up booking through ORD to guarantee lie-flat on the 767 and not have to worry about it.
rob_flies_ua is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread