UAUA Q3 results/news/Mileage Plus/conference call discussion
#61
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,139
And 0.5M would not have resulted in "much" lower losses - maybe "slightly" lower, but investment in the future is important for anyone planning to survive, so was probably well worth it.
#62
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SNA
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K (until it expires then never again), *wood Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,239
UA could have posted much lower losses if over $0.5M wasn't thrown at lobbying activities.
"United Airlines spent $550,000 lobbying during the third quarter on energy issues, passenger rights legislation and more, according to a disclosure form filed this week."
Full story: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/...ap5601765.html
"United Airlines spent $550,000 lobbying during the third quarter on energy issues, passenger rights legislation and more, according to a disclosure form filed this week."
Full story: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/...ap5601765.html
#63
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,987
OTOH I think that time has come for airlines to pay taxes on fuel, like everybody else.
Most interesting from our (pax) point of view should be passenger bill of rights. Of course UA as a customer oriented organization is lobbying in favour.
#65
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BWI, SEA 1/month
Programs: UA Platinum
Posts: 487
I never said it's a waste, but large portion of Q3 loss.
OTOH I think that time has come for airlines to pay taxes on fuel, like everybody else.
Most interesting from our (pax) point of view should be passenger bill of rights. Of course UA as a customer oriented organization is lobbying in favour.
OTOH I think that time has come for airlines to pay taxes on fuel, like everybody else.
Most interesting from our (pax) point of view should be passenger bill of rights. Of course UA as a customer oriented organization is lobbying in favour.
You may note that UA does have to pay taxes on fuel, as jet fuel is taxed in the US. The tax is much higher for general aviation fuel than for jet fuel, though, as commercial airlines only pay 4.4 cents / gallon compared to the 21.9 cents/gallon on general aviation. There was/is a bill in the Senate to remove the tax on commercial aviation, possibly due to concerns about competing with the untaxed European airlines.
I do not believe that the tax is paid on fuel used for international flights, though, but I could be wrong.
#66
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Today, more bad news for UAL due to falling oil prices:
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081125/united_hedging.html?.v=1
When falling oil prices threaten the liquidity of a company, the world has surely turned upside down.
UAL collateral on fuel hedges rises to almost $1B
Tuesday November 25, 1:18 pm ET
By Joshua Freed, AP Airlines Writer
United Airlines collateral on fuel hedges rises to almost $1B; credit card agreement reworked
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- Falling oil prices have forced United Airlines to put up hundreds of million of dollars in new collateral on fuel hedges that have turned against it, and on Tuesday it said it had re-worked a credit card agreement to reduce penalties if its cash balance falls.
Based on Tuesday's oil price of around $51 per barrel, United would have to put up some $990 million in collateral, according to a formula for its fuel hedges that it disclosed on Tuesday. By comparison, as of Sept. 30, it had $378 million in cash deposits held by people on the other side of its bet that fuel prices would keep rising.
Tuesday November 25, 1:18 pm ET
By Joshua Freed, AP Airlines Writer
United Airlines collateral on fuel hedges rises to almost $1B; credit card agreement reworked
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- Falling oil prices have forced United Airlines to put up hundreds of million of dollars in new collateral on fuel hedges that have turned against it, and on Tuesday it said it had re-worked a credit card agreement to reduce penalties if its cash balance falls.
Based on Tuesday's oil price of around $51 per barrel, United would have to put up some $990 million in collateral, according to a formula for its fuel hedges that it disclosed on Tuesday. By comparison, as of Sept. 30, it had $378 million in cash deposits held by people on the other side of its bet that fuel prices would keep rising.
When falling oil prices threaten the liquidity of a company, the world has surely turned upside down.
#67
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SNA
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K (until it expires then never again), *wood Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,239
Today, more bad news for UAL due to falling oil prices:
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081125/united_hedging.html?.v=1
When falling oil prices threaten the liquidity of a company, the world has surely turned upside down.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081125/united_hedging.html?.v=1
When falling oil prices threaten the liquidity of a company, the world has surely turned upside down.
They have puts covering 92% of Nov and Dec exposure at $60 barrel and 57% of 2009 exposure at $54 barrel. So its not all bad nor is it really "more bad news" just about everyone knew that all airlines are taking a bath on fuel hedging right now already, the question now is what to do about it. Buying puts to protect against further falling oil prices is about the only thing one can do.