despite its power, FFCC is becoming less useful on the flights where it would count
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,484
despite its power, FFCC is becoming less useful on the flights where it would count
Hi all --
following our past discussions, and your example/suggestions (" Who has the priority? Award seat (XC) waitlist or Y Upgraders?"), I decided to try and redeem tickets for my parents in XF, partially seated in NY, for a trip to Hawaii and back. I figured, if it's a trick we can use, I might as well take advantage of this opportunity, despite having argued what side effects it has, and how it is "supposed" to work.
I'm disappointed to say that on the two flights where it would have mattered (waiting for XF EWR-DEN out, and HNL-ORD back), the FFCC strategy did not help much at all for us, or in the case of EWR-DEN, the agents were in addition not helpful in applying it. I ended up splitting F with my parents so they could sit at least part of the way and rest on that very long HNL-ORD flight.
I have come to the conclusion that inventory management is doing exactly as we talked about -- deciding that upgraders are more important than award redemptions. On many flights, including the ones that we tried, they are basically trickling out F seats to the NF bucket all the way up to departure, even on the morning of, leaving practically nothing by the time of DM list clearing, to even try your chances with FFCC as top priority. So regardless of the debate over XF or NF priority on the day of, it is irrelevant because there are no seats to be had.
On the flights where it matters, as a matter in practice, all upgrades have become clear-in-advance, with many cleared automatically on the day of by status, before it gets handed to the gate (where FFCC comes into play an hour or so before departure). So even my efforts to check in early and request being added as FFCC were irrelevant (the OGG/HNL agents were very helpful with this I have to say, and I thanked them). The only hope there, is that someone doesn't show up for the flight basically.
On the one hand, it is good for 1Ks, GS, full fares, etc. who benefit from this early upgrade clearance on paid tickets (my revenue upgrade cleared 3 weeks out on that same exact flight), but it also hits us too when we try to redeem F seats where there are none to be had, in hopes that it may clear. I think I have been burned and will not try this again in the future.
I wrote UA suggesting that just like NY, maybe they can consider creating a special redemption bucket of F seats for 1Ks, so that at least if they release any F seats, some can be allocated for us at reasonable mileage award levels.
ah well. would be interested to know your thoughts. of course, simple advice would be to find less crowded flights that are easier to redeem, but still, sometimes you hope that status can get you a special pass to paradise even on the most popular flights...
following our past discussions, and your example/suggestions (" Who has the priority? Award seat (XC) waitlist or Y Upgraders?"), I decided to try and redeem tickets for my parents in XF, partially seated in NY, for a trip to Hawaii and back. I figured, if it's a trick we can use, I might as well take advantage of this opportunity, despite having argued what side effects it has, and how it is "supposed" to work.
I'm disappointed to say that on the two flights where it would have mattered (waiting for XF EWR-DEN out, and HNL-ORD back), the FFCC strategy did not help much at all for us, or in the case of EWR-DEN, the agents were in addition not helpful in applying it. I ended up splitting F with my parents so they could sit at least part of the way and rest on that very long HNL-ORD flight.
I have come to the conclusion that inventory management is doing exactly as we talked about -- deciding that upgraders are more important than award redemptions. On many flights, including the ones that we tried, they are basically trickling out F seats to the NF bucket all the way up to departure, even on the morning of, leaving practically nothing by the time of DM list clearing, to even try your chances with FFCC as top priority. So regardless of the debate over XF or NF priority on the day of, it is irrelevant because there are no seats to be had.
On the flights where it matters, as a matter in practice, all upgrades have become clear-in-advance, with many cleared automatically on the day of by status, before it gets handed to the gate (where FFCC comes into play an hour or so before departure). So even my efforts to check in early and request being added as FFCC were irrelevant (the OGG/HNL agents were very helpful with this I have to say, and I thanked them). The only hope there, is that someone doesn't show up for the flight basically.
On the one hand, it is good for 1Ks, GS, full fares, etc. who benefit from this early upgrade clearance on paid tickets (my revenue upgrade cleared 3 weeks out on that same exact flight), but it also hits us too when we try to redeem F seats where there are none to be had, in hopes that it may clear. I think I have been burned and will not try this again in the future.
I wrote UA suggesting that just like NY, maybe they can consider creating a special redemption bucket of F seats for 1Ks, so that at least if they release any F seats, some can be allocated for us at reasonable mileage award levels.
ah well. would be interested to know your thoughts. of course, simple advice would be to find less crowded flights that are easier to redeem, but still, sometimes you hope that status can get you a special pass to paradise even on the most popular flights...
Last edited by TA; Oct 16, 2008 at 4:35 pm
#2
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Programs: UA, AA, WN; HH, MR, IHG
Posts: 7,054
I'd be willing to be good money (which, incidentally, I don't have ) that the majority of people redeeming XC/XF awards are already elite (or traveling with one). Not only that, 1Ks already get to see the premium cabins much more than everyone else (via CR-1s and SWUs)... a special 1K-XF bucket would all but guarantee that lower elites wouldn't be able to redeem premium awards. IMHO, anyway.
#3
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SFO
Programs: COdbaUA Platinum 2MM
Posts: 5,532
Sorry to hear about your results. Were you flying on M-TH with 2-class 767/777 service?
#4
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAX
Programs: UA MM | BA Silver
Posts: 7,193
I also has posed a similar question regarding an XF award and the last segment in Y.
I went to the RCC last week and asked to have my companion put on the F waitlist because although ticketed in F she was in Y. Agent had no problem adding her to the list (FFCC) and moved her up to E+ just in case the seat didn't come through. Was #1 on the waitlist and got the F seat no problem.
It depends on what routes I imagine, but I do believe that if added to FFCC at a reasonable time, you can still beat out the upgraders on the DM.
I went to the RCC last week and asked to have my companion put on the F waitlist because although ticketed in F she was in Y. Agent had no problem adding her to the list (FFCC) and moved her up to E+ just in case the seat didn't come through. Was #1 on the waitlist and got the F seat no problem.
It depends on what routes I imagine, but I do believe that if added to FFCC at a reasonable time, you can still beat out the upgraders on the DM.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,484
#6
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Programs: UA 1K, SPG
Posts: 1,577
I have come to the conclusion that inventory management is doing exactly as we talked about -- deciding that upgraders are more important than award redemptions. On many flights, including the ones that we tried, they are basically trickling out F seats to the NF bucket all the way up to departure, even on the morning of, leaving practically nothing by the time of DM list clearing, to even try your chances with FFCC as top priority. So regardless of the debate over XF or NF priority on the day of, it is irrelevant because there are no seats to be had.
Also, you keep saying that this is a "trick." After your experience, wouldn't this be better described as a "risk"? You are basically risking paying for something that you don't end up receiving.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,484
Also, you keep saying that this is a "trick." After your experience, wouldn't this be better described as a "risk"? You are basically risking paying for something that you don't end up receiving.
#8
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 574
NY is no bargain. I can't speak for domestic flights, but for international flights it has only fractionally more seats in most cases I have seen.
#10
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SEA, WAS, PEK
Programs: UA 3K UGS 3MM
Posts: 2,176
Along the same lines, I think they need to change the PA/PB to a status-based waitlist rather than FIFO. I know that when GS tells me that 'I have top priority' that really is not true until it goes to DM.
Why should a GM or 2P beat a GS or full/high fare person on the waitlist simply because they booked their ticket further in advance. It costs more to book close in, yet doing so puts your further down on the PA/PB.
Why should a GM or 2P beat a GS or full/high fare person on the waitlist simply because they booked their ticket further in advance. It costs more to book close in, yet doing so puts your further down on the PA/PB.
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,484
I think one counterargument to this is that PA is already populated by only 1Ks, or the beneficiaries of their upgrade instruments. You can't get on PA without being, or knowing a 1K, isn't that right? PA consists of SWUs and CR1 upgrade requests?
#12
Join Date: Sep 2002
Programs: The opinions expressed here are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the airlines I worked for.
Posts: 1,894
In some ways this is also a by-product of what used to be a relatively unknown boarding priority being publicized to the entire FlyerTalk community
But on that note, it is what it is and the DM list will sort out who belongs in the premium seats.
But on that note, it is what it is and the DM list will sort out who belongs in the premium seats.
#13
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,498
I went to the RCC last week and asked to have my companion put on the F waitlist because although ticketed in F she was in Y. Agent had no problem adding her to the list (FFCC) and moved her up to E+ just in case the seat didn't come through. Was #1 on the waitlist and got the F seat no problem.
#14
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Programs: UA 1K, SPG
Posts: 1,577
It is a risk, but also a "trick" because in better times (and certain routes) it allowed you to pretty surely only have to redeem at the normal levels for an F award seat. And you are not automatically added to that list -- you have to know and ask, hence the trick.
And mileage upgrades for and by 1Ks.
#15
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SEA, WAS, PEK
Programs: UA 3K UGS 3MM
Posts: 2,176
That's why I said PA and PB. I (and I assum you) have seen F seats dwindle(yes, they COULD be paid) to the point of F0 many hours prior to the DM. I don't understand why anyone upgrading (miles, swu, whatever) should have priority simply because they booked early. Those that book late are the ones paying the highest fares...