Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Operational upgrades from a gate agent's perspective

Operational upgrades from a gate agent's perspective

 
Old Sep 28, 06, 12:52 am
  #151  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cuenca, Ecuador
Programs: UA, AA, DL, SPG, Hyatt
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by spurg
Great thread. learned alot. thanks. exhausted from reading it....
Me too!

Originally Posted by dmodemd
Despite what has been said here, I have seen many cases where people were granted upgrades outside of the "pecking order" described here. I often camp out near the GA desk to gain insight into what goes on there and in some cases have found that people with various stories have been successful in getting themselves upgraded. Usually it was due to either a sob story, schmoozing the GA, or knowing the GA personally indirectly through someone else. Most GAs don't do this, but there are some that are more likely to do it. The one I saw doing this the most was at Dulles in fact and was on UA 917 SEA-IAD a few months ago (a 763 with plenty of C/F space to hand out with no-op ups required). She gave out a handful of upgrades after listening to stories/schmoozing. This happens more often when that GA is the only one working the gate. This is apparently against UA policy, but I guess these GAs feel that noone will ever know. I don't know if there are audits and what type of justification they have to enter in the record... In these cases, the people may have had status, but the GA just worked around the pecking order. Its sad but I guess power corrupts!
Nothing I have said has been presented as being true 100% of the time. While I acknowledge and agree the human element of the job is always at play, it would be exceedingly rare and risky for a gate agent to go around the pecking order in an op-up situation. Yes audits are done, but not often. How were you given access to the pecking order so that you were able to confirm the agent disregarded it? I'm sure you maybe have witnessed a sob story turned into an upgrade, but that negates the existence of a pecking order, as you said this flight was no op-ups needed. You're talking about free upgrades outside of op-up situations. I pretty much tried to stick to the op-ups scenario. Different ballgames. But yes, free upgrades aren't really authorized. The gate agent would have to be able to justify the reason for doing it if questioned by a supervisor.

Originally Posted by SFWanderer
DullesJason, this was truly one of the most comprehensive, valuable posting I've ever read on FT. This certainly is not meant to lessen other valuable posting we've all learned from but to get the inside skinny like this was truly amazing. ^ ^

I think we now fully understand that UA and their undervalued, under appreciated GA's operate fairly in the distribution of ug's. Call it "dancing," call it "science," regardless, there is no free ride, no cutting in front.

Some of us give chocolates, lollypops, etc. to the FA's when we board. I can't believe I wasn't making the same effort to you. That will change. Honestly. When I can, I'll make it a point to say, "I'm not asking for anything but thought you guys might enjoy this later" and walk away.
Thanks, that's what I tried to do--show how gate agents go through the process and try very hard to abide by a fair system. UA GAs are generally very conscientious about this concept of fairness and not making exceptions at the expense of deserving, loyal customers. It does take a certain amount of fortitude to say no all the time, but one gets better at recognizing BS with time and experience. As an employee I agreed with the system and now as a general, non-elite member, I still agree with the system in place, even though I don't benefit from it.

I always appreciated the odd customer who gave me candy or a bottle of water, then smiled and walked away in clear indication they expected nothing in return (and got nothing), but just appreciated my hard work, etc. So SFWanderer, I'm sure the first gate agent upon whom you bestow such thoughtfulness, will likewise be appreciative because it's rare

Last edited by iluv2fly; Oct 7, 09 at 1:12 am Reason: merge
DullesJason is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 1:25 am
  #152  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cuenca, Ecuador
Programs: UA, AA, DL, SPG, Hyatt
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by shisochou
This is quite possibly the most informative post I've seen to date on FT. Thank you for taking the time to write this, DullesJason!

I am curious as to why it is important to be present at the gate if you hope to have an op-up. Is it just to make yourself "noticed"? If op-ups are done on a tiered system by status, then fare basis, then time of check-in, etc. then wouldn't those people eligible for the op-up be getting one anyway?

I remember getting an op-up as a 2P on SFO-KIX; I spent most of my time at the RCC, and arrived at the gate when they started boarding seating 1. When my BP was scanned, it was then that I found out my seating assignment had changed and I was upgraded to C.
It's important to be at the gate if (and only if) you're among those likely to be called because the gate agent is only human and may give up on getting you to respond to a page after 2-3 times if you don't show up. At a large hub, there isn't the environment for communication between gate & RCC, so if you don't hear your name called, you may be bypassed.

If you're at the gate so you can hear when your name is called for an op-up, you have 100% of getting the op-up. If you're not at the gate, I'd guess your odds drop to no better than 50-50. Apparently it worked in your favor SFo-KIX and that's great, but it may not next time you're in the same situation as an op-up candidate and spend all your pre-board time in thr RCC. There is always the next 1K, next 1P, next 2P who also is deserving and is more convient to give the op-up to. My original post alluded to importance of convenience, which is a huge factor in achieveing on-time departures.

Just something to keep in mind.

Originally Posted by Intex98
It took me awhile, but I finally made my way through this tread.
Yeah, it's a doozie, isn't it.

I must say, this has been the most informative series of posts I've read in my short time as a FTer. Thanks again DullesJason!
I gave it a good effort to make it very informative or entertainin for the reason that I think FT has tons of valuable information. Just keep looking and you'll find much more.

Originally Posted by dliesse
A couple mentions of op-ups on the SEA-DEN 777 got me thinking. I happen to be on that flight a couple weeks from now, but going through to ORD (i.e., SEA-DEN-ORD through flight, no connections). How would a situation like that affect one's selection for an op-up, and would it be for both sectors or just the first one?

BTW, I'll echo everyone else: this is the most informative post I've seen in a long time!
Thanks. An op-up is segment specific because it is done due to an operational need. After the first, you may or may not get the 2nd.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Oct 7, 09 at 1:12 am Reason: merge
DullesJason is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 1:46 am
  #153  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cuenca, Ecuador
Programs: UA, AA, DL, SPG, Hyatt
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by iapetus
Wow! I can't believe I've read the entire thing! Just goes to show how interesting a thread this has been. That said, I'll further it a little.

Maybe, but don't sell the GA position too short here. I am always amazed at how good GAs handle irr ops. I think that GAs have deal with far more garbage from nasty, angry pax during irr ops than anyone else in the system. Having witnessed some of these situations, I get thoroughly embarrassed to be one of the pax when I see GAs being thusly abused. (That snowy March night in ORD earlier this year during which I got that op-up I mentioned upthread comes to mind.) So, yeah, maybe things aren't too stressful when all is well, but I really feel for the GA when it all starts hitting the fan.

I agree completely. However, I suspect that many GAs would dislike such a system at first, feeling that it restricts their own flexibility, particularly during irr ops.
Guidelines make it easier to say no! And to remind agents to put the favor where the money is!!! But there also is ample flexibility in how the gate agent worksthe flight. There are still plenty of decisions to make. It's not just a checklist. Good agents are decisive, knowledgable and skilled at multitasking.

Yes it can be very difficult during irreg ops and I hope all of you are reminded of that the next time you consider being abusive to an agent ot F/A, etc. But abuse it part of the job. I think it wasn't so much I was selling it short but I don't think it's the hardest or most stressful job in the world. Comparisons that come to mind are emergency rooms, EMTs, cops, FDNY, etc. Gate agents are unquestionablyy undervalued and underappreciated, but they don't deal with life and death.

Which makes me wonder why some flyers fail to see it that way and portray a middle seat as a life & death issue. Seriously. It happens.

Originally Posted by harryhv
Wonderful post, compulsive reading and a happy ending.

Now you've entranced us with your literary skill, all FT is waiting for a sequel.

How about a horror story, plenty of those at IAD
LOL, the endings aren't all as happy as I described. A sequel? Hmmmm, not even done with the first one yet. I'm planning to answer as many questions as I can.

Horror Story? Nah! Never had them! What makes you think such things could have possibly happened?

Originally Posted by HeathrowGuy
DullesJason:

An excellent post, which raises one question for me:

For many airlines, a trump card that can cause someone to leapfrog ahead even of top-tier Elites in the "op-up" queue is being added on to the flight's volunteer list. Does this often hold true for United flights as well?
This doesn't sound familiar. Can you elaborate? You mean the volunteer denied boaridng list? At UA, there is no way to "leap frog" top tier elites. As it pertains to op-ups, United wants the most valuable customers rewarded first and would presumable disallow leapfrogging as you've described, which I have never heard of.

When I posted this I knew there would be follow up questions and I was prepared to answer them--though I am surprised how many have come in a little more than a day. It looks like I have made it through post #140. I will continue as time permits. Be patient if you have questions. Sleep beckons.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Oct 7, 09 at 1:13 am Reason: merge
DullesJason is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 9:43 am
  #154  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So. California
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 611
My reasons for chosing to fly UA (after TWA became AA) was from the many very good recommendations given regarding the good service and the good MP program. I have often seen people groveling at the gate for upgrades, and some have even been way out of line when things did not go their way.

Thank you, DullesJason, for your information and your perspective as it has only confirmed my reasons for flying United! It has also provided an education (both in terms of information as well as 'courtesy and manners') which will help me appreciate all the work the GA does in order to make my flying experience a good one.

I hope that you may have the time to provide yet another perspective so that we can all become better flyers!

Thanks! ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Thomas

Last edited by cielodome; Sep 28, 06 at 10:13 am Reason: Typos
cielodome is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 10:07 am
  #155  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 471
THanks for the perspective from the GA>

I really like UA's non-double upgrade policy and revenue first (over status). I wonder if other airlines follow this.
jyatlantic is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 10:30 am
  #156  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: BA Gold, FB Plat, MR plat
Posts: 118
Thanks for the post DJ, it is reassuring to hear the policy is in place to reward by status and revenue in op-up situations
Leccy is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 10:58 am
  #157  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: Continental Gold Elite, United Premier Executive
Posts: 6,766
Originally Posted by DullesJason
This doesn't sound familiar. Can you elaborate? You mean the volunteer denied boaridng list? At UA, there is no way to "leap frog" top tier elites. As it pertains to op-ups, United wants the most valuable customers rewarded first and would presumable disallow leapfrogging as you've described, which I have never heard of.
At several airlines, in cases where passengers do not need to be offloaded but DO need to be opup'd, those who volunteered to be offloaded will, by virtue of policy or habitual convenience, receive op-upgrades before anyone else.
HeathrowGuy is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 11:17 am
  #158  
gre
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: IAD, DCA
Programs: UA-Plat, Marriott-Plat, AAI, AAII
Posts: 3,758
Originally Posted by cravenstatus
Whenever I schmooze an upgrade, I enjoy seeing the pursed lips of any stuffed shirts that may have overheard.

It's just upgrades.
Smooze and "the speech" are two different things .
gre is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 12:31 pm
  #159  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cuenca, Ecuador
Programs: UA, AA, DL, SPG, Hyatt
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by aceman
I second that sentiment, and im not even a MP member!!!

Just curious (since im tremendously corrupt after too much time in the past couple of years in vegas) what about straight bribery??

I'm not joking, how would the majority of GA's react if they were on the gate on their own and someone whispered to them that they'd slip them a couple of hundred to go from Y to C? (obviously im talking about international here!) -in both situations, ie where op ups would be needed, and where they wouldnt.
I don't think any GA that valued their job and wanted to keep it would accept. There is a high risk of getting caught and I don't think $200 is worth losing a job many GAs went to considerable effort to obtain. Maybe if someone had turned in their 2 weeks notice, but in all my years I had only one incident where someone offered me money and it was not a substantial sum. But aside from the risk, I think most GAs value their integrity so I seriously doubt anyone who tried it would have much luck except where the agent and customer knew and trusted each other in very rare circumstances.. I can't comment on UA stations in 3rd world countries except to say I'd guess it's rare there too.
DullesJason is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 12:37 pm
  #160  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
Jason - I'm curious at how much interaction the GAs have with each other. You're mostly working flights on your own, or with only one other person. Is there a lot of interaction when you're not on the floor? Also, how are GAs assigned to flights - is it just who is available/free-for-all or are some graded at a higher level and handle the international or widebody flights? Can the GA pick which flights they'll work?

This thread has been fascinating to see and hear the other side, I appreciate you taking the time to chat with us.
GoingAway is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 12:38 pm
  #161  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cuenca, Ecuador
Programs: UA, AA, DL, SPG, Hyatt
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by FF_Parrothead
First, I'll turn the echo machine on: This is a great post. I have received some op/ups over the last few years, but never new why, and never solicited for them.

Now, time to vent

I see this all the time. My last flight from NRT-ORD, I was in line at the RCC in NRT to BUY an upgrade to C behind a group of United employees who were all being upgraded. When it was my turn, suprise, no C seats available.

When I boarded the plane, there were two people in C complaning of broken seats. The FA offered to help them get partial refunds for the broken seat, one said "Well that doesn't really help, we're both UA employees."

I called United a few weeks later to complain, giving flight details and the situation. I was assured that employees don't get priority for upgrades.
They don't. All is not what it seems.

Upgrading is one thing and confirmed seating is another. When a UA employee is on business travel, he or she is entitled to book the C cabin on a 3 cabin aircraft, or Y on a 2 cabin.

So those 2 UA employees weren't on upgrades--they already held the seats with tickets in C. You had a ticket in Y. Not all people in C are upgrades. All is not what it seems.

Originally Posted by gre
I always found the concept of "the speech" a little distasteful/degrading and so never tried it.

Thanks for ther confirmation.
I've pretty much always agreed. I'd never try it either. You're welcome

Last edited by iluv2fly; Oct 7, 09 at 1:14 am Reason: merge
DullesJason is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 1:08 pm
  #162  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SEA & RDM
Programs: UA - 1MM, DL Diamond, AS MVP75, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,837
Originally Posted by DullesJason
I've pretty much always agreed. I'd never try it either. You're welcome
What about offering to VDB if needed? Do GAs not like that as well?
andyh64000 is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 1:11 pm
  #163  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cuenca, Ecuador
Programs: UA, AA, DL, SPG, Hyatt
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by aceman
yes, but no self respecting briber would not have perfected 'the move' in a variety of different and invisible manners!
Getting witnessed is not the issue. If an agent gets caught it wouldn't be in the act. It can all be easily discovered in the computer

Originally Posted by carbonchaser
DullesJason, it would be outright peevish of me to not first compliment you on a spectacular (not first) post and, even more importantly, about the endless stream of further questions you've clarified.

Here is one I haven;t seen - though at ten pages long I may well have missed. A couple weeks ago there was a discussion about the "on-board upgrade" when the GA walks up the aisle with a clipboard and taps one lucky passenger to come up. It's happened to me a handful of times and others as well (though with SWU/miles upgrades generally in my case) Is there really no significant discrimination if you have already boarded the plane? I would think so, given the "zero late" culture
Well you're clearly not peevish!

I rarely carried a clipboard on the plane. Yes, if you've boarded, sometimes the agent doesn't have the time to go ont he plane to get you, whether it's an op-up situation or a supported U/G situation. If you board, you have seriously reduced your chances of moving up a cabin.

Originally Posted by HeathrowGuy
With the exception of Star lounge access, I humbly assert that at no time should a Star Silver Gold/Silver member receive something from United ahead of ANY United Elite - hence part of the rationale behind scrapping E+ access for Star Elites.
I doubt your view will ever be shared by UA senior management as long as UA remains in the Star Alliance. Might I suggest you move up to 1P? Then it won't be an issue--you'll trump *Gs

Last edited by iluv2fly; Oct 7, 09 at 1:15 am Reason: merge
DullesJason is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 1:30 pm
  #164  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cuenca, Ecuador
Programs: UA, AA, DL, SPG, Hyatt
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by laser
Wow! Great thread! I have often wondered how my one int'l op-up (C -> F) was granted on a flight I rarely take (NRT-ICN), while the int'l flight I take 6 or 7 times a year (SFO-NRT) never has generated an op-up for me in either direction. I usually fly discounted economy (M, H, etc.) on this flight. Now I can see it is very logical how the process works and not that I was just unlucky on my usual flight. Being a 1P on an elite-rich flight (SFO-NRT) with a discounted economy ticket pretty much assures me that an op-up is out of the question. So, I won't even consider it in the future. Have to work on getting 1K!!
Yes, exactly. I wouldn't say it's quite out of the question, but the more elites you compete with for limited op-up space, the harder it is for discount fare buying 1Ps. 1K would help a lot. But then again, do you really want to spend that much more of your life on United's airplanes when you don't have to?
DullesJason is offline  
Old Sep 28, 06, 1:34 pm
  #165  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Programs: United/Star Alliance - 1K
Posts: 2,176
Originally Posted by DullesJason
Yes, exactly. I wouldn't say it's quite out of the question, but the more elites you compete with for limited op-up space, the harder it is for discount fare buying 1Ps. 1K would help a lot. But then again, do you really want to spend that much more of your life on United's airplanes when you don't have to?
--------------
If you're only 1P, you do have to.
Javan69 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.