Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Question about M class fare and E+ seating

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 8:44 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 92
Question about M class fare and E+ seating

Hello all,

As you can tell, I don't really post much here on this forum, though I enjoy reading everything here a lot. I'm still a student and do not fly enough to get status on UA, though it is my preferred airline and I have a MP account.

I am planning a trip to Europe (IAD-WAW-ORD) this summer, and my question concerns E+ plus seating. Is a M class fare eligible for E+ seating? The flyertalk post about UA fares states that it is almost fullfare economy, and the seat map shows E+ seats avaiable. One of my routing options IAD-WAW is a M-class fare, and I would glady pay the $40 more for a E+ seat.

If not available for E+ seat, would you all recommend E- in a 767 or 777? My choice is either IAD-BRU-WAW or IAD-AMS-WAW, but with no available seat selection during booking and with no price difference (all on Q fares).

Thank you all in advance.
TomKozski is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 8:52 pm
  #2  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LAX
Programs: UA 1MM, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,760
Post

Yes, an M fare qualifies for E+

http://www.united.com/page/article/0,6722,1314,00.html
Morrissey is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 8:55 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by Morrissey
Oh, duh, I feel dumb now. Thanks for the link!
TomKozski is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 8:56 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York City
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 464
corrected for economy section only

Originally Posted by TomKozski

Is a M class fare eligible for E+ seating?
Yes

Originally Posted by TomKozski
If not available for E+ seat, would you all recommend E- in a 767 or 777?
From a comfort perspective, I find them to be the same thing. Both feature PTV's and are pretty good IMHO. I would go for the 777, simply because I prefer it over 767. (Economy class comparison only)
UA T7 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 9:02 pm
  #5  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: US/Asia-Pacific
Programs: Peon extraordinaire
Posts: 393
i'm curious as to why not H class? i know that E/U have eclipsed it in the 'official' fare hierarchy that FT has constructed in the FAQ, but it's miles-upgradable to region 2 which E/U are not.

Last edited by KeyManRisk; Apr 11, 2006 at 9:04 pm Reason: misguided comment removed.
KeyManRisk is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 9:06 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York City
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 464
Originally Posted by KeyManRisk
i'm curious as to why not H class? i know that E/U have eclipsed it in the 'official' fare hierarchy that FT has constructed in the FAQ, but it's miles-upgradable to region 2 which E/U are not.
For some reason, I'm under the impression E/U aren't Region 2 fares.. Not sure though
UA T7 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 9:21 pm
  #7  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: US/Asia-Pacific
Programs: Peon extraordinaire
Posts: 393
Originally Posted by UA T7
For some reason, I'm under the impression E/U aren't Region 2 fares.. Not sure though
that may be, but i guess just having the ability to upgrade H fares in region 2 would make me expect that they're (nearly) as good as M fares, so they'd also get E+. well, isn't a problem for me, just curious.
KeyManRisk is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.