Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

The more you spend the worse you are treated

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

The more you spend the worse you are treated

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2011, 3:48 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Hyatt GLOB, Marriott Lifetime PLT, UA 1K 1MM.
Posts: 1,728
unfortunately, it's a merger. they're messy. there's damage. it's normal. i've experienced some turbulence with the daily operations just like everyone else has.

personally, i'm giving it a few months into the new year (maybe even a half or full year) to see how the new program rolls out in practice. we can theorize all we want but my humble opinion is that until it's put into practice it's hard to tell what life will be like. i think a lot of the problems we're experiencing now (at least my observation) seems to be that it's because two large airlines that have been capacity cutting and that's heavy on elites are merging and there will be some headaches for a while and it will take time for things to level out.

well i don't know if it will or if it won't, but either way it'll take time to see.

that's not to say you should put up with that kind of treatment. the OP's story sucks, yes, but if it's that bad maybe it's time to jump to another airline, like a lot of other people said, that better suits your needs.

in my eyes, the new UA that's coming out is a different beast than the legacy UA or CO ever were. we're all human so it'll happen, but i don't think it's productive to get angry about things about the new UA that don't fit us. i think it's better to determine if it's a good fit for you, and if not, then to decide which airline does. that's what's on my mind.

none of the airlines and FF programs are perfect out there, each one has severe headaches nowadays. there's less chairs in F these days and more people, when the music stops and the doors shut, everyone's going to want that chair. i say just find the airline that gives you the best shot at that. honestly, as a high paying B fare customer, if your spend is big enough i'm sure that protesting with your wallet will get your voice heard the loudest. just my 2c.
bob_the_d is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2011, 7:47 am
  #62  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 6,912
half year

Originally Posted by bob_the_d

personally, i'm giving it a few months into the new year (maybe even a half or full year) to see how the new program rolls out in practice.
one should definitely give it about half year at least since many of the changes won't officially take effect till likely end of March, 2012
nmenaker is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 12:41 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: HNL
Posts: 1
the more you spend the worse they treat you

I empathize with you, but look at my situation. Annually, I take 4 trips to see my gkids 5000 miles away. So I'm in the lowest level of Premier, but I pay for my tickets with my small pension. Most of you business travelers get your fares paid by your companies and you keep the freq flyer miles to use it for upgrades and other benefits like taking your families on vacation using miles. Others who own your companies, claim these trips on your taxes. I repeat...my trips are paid from my limited income and I can't claim it on my taxes.

Now, United it taking all my benefits away. All I'm getting is 1 bag free. This is all I get for loyalty and for letting United have a huge chunk of my pension. Well, I will probably take my loyalty somewhere else.

I don't think you business travelers should complain. If anything, people like me have a reason to gripe.
granny2 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 1:14 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA: 1K, HH: Diamond
Posts: 1,330
Aloha and welcome, granny2. I can certainly understand your frustration. I'm going to be a wee Premier myself.
deirdre is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 9:27 am
  #65  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by iluv2fly
Disagree. If they would hold back E+ seats, they certainly should hold back F seats. Makes economic sense. If not sold, use for upgrades.

In fact, I would argue that they should hold back F seats before E+ seats.
Originally Posted by Often1
UA's new MP to be implemented in 2012 responds to OP's valid concerns. [...]

Holding seats back won't fix 100% of the problems, but it will make it a great deal easier. There will, however, be a lot of angry 1K and below who generally fly on discount fares (below M). While they will technically be eligible for UDU, the likelihood of that happening on status-heavy F-heavy routes will drop radically.
Before we throw 2Ps under the bus, how about we go back a few years to the pre-UDU era when e-500s were used. In that era, as a 1K, regardless of fare, I never missed on upgrade when using a CR-1, and my e-500 upgrade rate was better than my UDU rate. In the pre-UDU era, everyone was happy except for a vocal minority of elites who felt that the F cabin should never go empty even if they didn't want to spend an upgrade instrument.

The 100% solution is to dump CPU/UDU/EUA and use e-500s. Let 2Ps confirm E+ at time of booking. Hold back a few E+ aisles and windows for 1Ks who purchase B and Y (not that it will be necessary, because without UDU, a 1K who buys 48 hours or less before departure and burns a CR-1 or e500s, would still clear).

While I am 1P for life, I've no illusions that I will have 2012's 1P benefits (which are sharply reduced from 2011's 1P benefits) for life. So I am very sympathetic to 2Ps as wells as high spending elites who buy high fares and get steerage treatment. As soon as you adjust your mentality to throwing a lower tier elite under the bus, you will find a higher tier elite equally as willing to throw you under the bus.

Collectively we (GS, 1K, 0P, 1P, 2P) should be throwing GMs and non-members under the bus.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 10:05 am
  #66  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,568
Originally Posted by mre5765
The 100% solution is to dump CPU/UDU/EUA and use e-500s. Let 2Ps confirm E+ at time of booking. Hold back a few E+ aisles and windows for 1Ks who purchase B and Y (not that it will be necessary, because without UDU, a 1K who buys 48 hours or less before departure and burns a CR-1 or e500s, would still clear).

While I am 1P for life, I've no illusions that I will have 2012's 1P benefits (which are sharply reduced from 2011's 1P benefits) for life. So I am very sympathetic to 2Ps as wells as high spending elites who buy high fares and get steerage treatment. As soon as you adjust your mentality to throwing a lower tier elite under the bus, you will find a higher tier elite equally as willing to throw you under the bus.

Collectively we (GS, 1K, 0P, 1P, 2P) should be throwing GMs and non-members under the bus.
^^ x 1000
halls120 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 10:48 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: variously: PVG, SFO, LHR
Programs: AA ExPlat, UA 1MM Gold, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 1,678
Originally Posted by r_pad
The benefit is theirs, not mine. UDU has meant less upgrade on long haul flights for me and many other 1Ks. That hasn't benefitted me at all.
Certainly true that informed flyers/Flyertalkers benefitted the most under the old program. If you knew how to manage your upgrade balance, one had a much better shot of an upgrade on the mid/transcon flights.

However, somebody is getting those transcon upgrades today, and its probably the flyers that previously didn't know how to use their upgrade instruments (or didn't know very well how to use them).

It remains to be seen whether group 1 or group 2 is/was more profitable for United. I'm going to guess it's probably group 2, so we're stuck with it
andrewwm is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 11:30 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NorCal - 1K 2MM
Posts: 2,089
Originally Posted by mre5765
Collectively we (GS, 1K, 0P, 1P, 2P) should be throwing GMs and non-members under the bus.
I admit a bit OT, but how will the 1P, 2P nomenclature change next year when there are 3 non-1K Premier levels rather than two? How will Silver, Gold, and Platinum be abbreviated?
Starman is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 11:44 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by Starman
I admit a bit OT, but how will the 1P, 2P nomenclature change next year when there are 3 non-1K Premier levels rather than two? How will Silver, Gold, and Platinum be abbreviated?
same as this year, in my opinion, with the addition of 0P (zero P)

0P = Plat / 75K EQM
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 11:55 am
  #70  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,386
Originally Posted by mre5765
Collectively we (GS, 1K, 0P, 1P, 2P) should be throwing GMs and non-members under the bus.
More like throwing them to WN, VX, AS and B6- airlines that try to give a better coach experience as a baseline than something out of a Dickens novel, complete with "Please sir, may I have some more?" At which point you can complain about RJ "barbie jets" and service cuts.

The vast majority of the American public doesn't fly 25,000 miles a year (my mom flies a few times a year, but she doesn't even come close to elite status anywhere... thus she flies WN). But airlines would be bankrupt very fast if ALL they could depend upon was business travel/frequent flyers. What drives the ability to have 4,6,8,10 frequencies a day on a route? The people we mock as "kettles".

Certainly treat loyal customers better- but I'm convinced that part of the reason the legacy airlines have floundered collectively since deregulation is they've taken from the masses to kiss rear ends of elites, and this is a pretty compelling reason to go towards an AS or WN- feeling that your business is valued even if you don't generate 6 digits of mileage every year.

Last edited by eponymous_coward; Dec 9, 2011 at 12:01 pm
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 12:38 pm
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Originally Posted by granny2
I empathize with you, but look at my situation. Annually, I take 4 trips to see my gkids 5000 miles away. So I'm in the lowest level of Premier, but I pay for my tickets with my small pension. Most of you business travelers get your fares paid by your companies and you keep the freq flyer miles to use it for upgrades and other benefits like taking your families on vacation using miles. Others who own your companies, claim these trips on your taxes. I repeat...my trips are paid from my limited income and I can't claim it on my taxes.

Now, United it taking all my benefits away. All I'm getting is 1 bag free. This is all I get for loyalty and for letting United have a huge chunk of my pension. Well, I will probably take my loyalty somewhere else.

I don't think you business travelers should complain. If anything, people like me have a reason to gripe.
How would the airline have any way of knowing if a ticket was company or personally paid?
Baze is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 12:53 pm
  #72  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,598
Originally Posted by bldr1k
Yet another horrible roundtrip to DC.
I am a 1K flying on a B-fare roundtrip from DEN to IAD.
I spend $1600 on a roundtrip and get a middle seat both directions - as a 1K.
Sorry but you get what you deserve in my book. Why you even think that $1,600 RT Y was remotely acceptable?
Make a connection, book/fly First and do it for less, even if it's not on UACO.



Similar last minute F fares on DL thru ATL/MSP/DTW.
SFO777 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 1:01 pm
  #73  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: Lifetime UA 1K, Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 1,261
Originally Posted by SFO777
Sorry but you get what you deserve in my book. Why you even think that $1,600 RT Y was remotely acceptable?
Make a connection, book/fly First and do it for less, even if it's not on UACO.



Similar last minute F fares on DL thru ATL/MSP/DTW.
Yup - I don't disagree. Unless you are GS, last minute travel on United is expensive and may even reward you with a center seat.
bldr1k is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 1:23 pm
  #74  
Used to be 'g_leyser'
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brandon Johnson International Airport (expect delays)
Programs: AA PlatPro, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold, IHG Plat, Reno Air MEGA Platinum
Posts: 10,036
Sorry guys, but the "you should've taken a connection" suggestion is simply not reasonable in my case.

I have no time for that, and even if I did, I certainly wouldn't be willing to sacrifice my precious time at home, or at least on the ground.
It is not worth a few hundred bucks to either myself, or to my company.
YMMV.
aisleorwindow is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2011, 1:38 pm
  #75  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,598
Originally Posted by g_leyser
Sorry guys, but the "you should've taken a connection" suggestion is simply not reasonable in my case.
I have no time for that, and even if I did, I certainly wouldn't be willing to sacrifice my precious time at home, or at least on the ground.
It is not worth a few hundred bucks to either myself, or to my company.
YMMV.
Spoken like a true (OPM) company man.
I find it hard to believe that many people would accept a middle Y- seat for 3+ hours (7+ hours on a RT) for $1,600, and could not find the time to save $300, fly more comfortably and earn more EQMs. YMMV indeed.
SFO777 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.