Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Information/Discussion of the Seating Updates to UA's International 777 Fleet [2011]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Information/Discussion of the Seating Updates to UA's International 777 Fleet [2011]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2011, 2:20 pm
  #151  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Programs: UA former 2P
Posts: 33
I was wondering the same thing about N782UA.

flightaware seems to indicate that N229UA has been in SFO since Aug 28th. What's it been doing for the past couple of weeks ?
Troy_smf is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2011, 2:30 pm
  #152  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and everywhere else
Programs: VX Gold, UA MM, SPG Plat
Posts: 707
N229UA is in for conversion, according to the wiki.
transpac-canuck is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2011, 7:58 am
  #153  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Programs: UA 1K, DL Gold, HH Gold, and SPG Gold
Posts: 408
when will UA finish remodel their 777?

SEA-NRT still using the old aircraft? Even DL will change their SEA 767 to Airbus 330, which offers way better biz seats...
howto is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2011, 2:15 pm
  #154  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: 1A
Programs: UA GS, NH Diamond, Hyatt Lifetime Globalist (formerly Courtesy Card sadly), Amanjunkie, CLEAR
Posts: 3,713
Originally Posted by howto
SEA-NRT still using the old aircraft? Even DL will change their SEA 767 to Airbus 330, which offers way better biz seats...
I'm thinking this will be one of the last routes to change over on a more consistent basis. It's probably the lowest revenue route to NRT for UA from NA based on my experience in subjectively judging loads (especially in F/C)

I mean, we can't even always get the new config SFO->NRT and SFO is the biggest elite hub in the system!
ainternational is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011, 1:16 pm
  #155  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saigon/Hanoi/San Francisco
Posts: 1,779
NRT-SEA today (10/24) was the 77Q's
imm2b is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2011, 10:34 pm
  #156  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: 1P, AA EXP, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,491
Any in for conversion? Wiki doesn't look like it's changed in about 7-10 days or so.
SFOTurtle is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2011, 2:12 am
  #157  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,224
Originally Posted by SFOTurtle
Any in for conversion? Wiki doesn't look like it's changed in about 7-10 days or so.
I'm curious as well. SFO-LHR has lost two 777s, to be replaced by one 747. Assuming that 747 was replaced by one of the 777s, that still leaves a 777 spare. With the changes towards winter schedules, I was hoping that the rate of conversions would increase sharply. Instead it seems to be stopping.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2011, 9:42 am
  #158  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
Originally Posted by ainternational
I'm thinking this will be one of the last routes to change over on a more consistent basis. It's probably the lowest revenue route to NRT for UA from NA based on my experience in subjectively judging loads (especially in F/C)

I mean, we can't even always get the new config SFO->NRT and SFO is the biggest elite hub in the system!
Probably SEA, just after HNL-NRT, which I would guess will be at the bottom of the priority list. Would not even be surprised if some 2-class (CO) equipment will show up out of HNL, as it already does on the GUM run.
cesco.g is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2011, 11:08 am
  #159  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Programs: AS MVP 100K, UA PremEx-MM
Posts: 3,335
Originally Posted by cesco.g
Probably SEA, just after HNL-NRT, which I would guess will be at the bottom of the priority list.
I would not make this assumption; in 2009 HNL-NRT was one of the only all new-configuration 747 routes; it was a promotional thing as many Japanese travelers purchase F and C for their Hawaiian vacations.
Kurt is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2011, 11:36 am
  #160  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: 1A
Programs: UA GS, NH Diamond, Hyatt Lifetime Globalist (formerly Courtesy Card sadly), Amanjunkie, CLEAR
Posts: 3,713
Originally Posted by Kurt
I would not make this assumption; in 2009 HNL-NRT was one of the only all new-configuration 747 routes; it was a promotional thing as many Japanese travelers purchase F and C for their Hawaiian vacations.
Agreed with this, but are NRT<->GUA also going domestic 777's like HNL<->GUA?
ainternational is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2011, 2:24 pm
  #161  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA Plat
Posts: 435
Originally Posted by lhrsfo
I'm curious as well. SFO-LHR has lost two 777s, to be replaced by one 747. Assuming that 747 was replaced by one of the 777s, that still leaves a 777 spare. With the changes towards winter schedules, I was hoping that the rate of conversions would increase sharply. Instead it seems to be stopping.
I have no idea whether they are in for conversion or not, but N225UA and N218UA have not done any flying in a week or two, respectively.
twoaisleplane is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2011, 1:11 am
  #162  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 52
I posted this in the LH forum as well, but I suppose it might get more feedback here (at least for the UA product). Any thoughts?

I'm flying back from Stuttgart to Kansas City in December, but my choice of connecting airports could be Zurich, Munich, or Frankfurt. Looking at the Frankfurt options, I could be on...

1) LH0430 (744) from FRA to ORD
2) LH0446 (now 744; when I booked, A346) from FRA to DEN
2) UA0941 (772) from FRA to ORD

I take the risk of not having a PTV on the 744s, but I also risk not having VOD in the UA777. Any idea which gamble has higher odds?

It looks like 1/3 of each of the UA 772 and LH 744 fleets have been updated, so I'm not sure based solely on equipment choice which one is better. I'm leaning toward LH for better food and beverages, but I also do love the 777 -- just typically not in UA's 2-5-2 arrangement.
On a side note, it seems like the current plane for UA0941 is actually a 744, and I'd like to avoid UA's 744 (no real reason to go with UA 744 vs old LH 744). Is there an equipment change in plan for this route in December?
Tigerotor77W is offline  
Old Nov 8, 2011, 7:45 pm
  #163  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: People's Republic of HotTubistan
Posts: 1,408
Originally Posted by Tigerotor77W
On a side note, it seems like the current plane for UA0941 is actually a 744, and I'd like to avoid UA's 744 (no real reason to go with UA 744 vs old LH 744). Is there an equipment change in plan for this route in December?
941 is not a 744. It's protected by a 772 -- usually one of the four reconfigured 77Ds.
Bitterroot is offline  
Old Nov 8, 2011, 11:01 pm
  #164  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: 1P, AA EXP, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,491
Originally Posted by twoaisleplane
I have no idea whether they are in for conversion or not, but N225UA and N218UA have not done any flying in a week or two, respectively.
Alert the media: The Wiki has now been updated to reflect that these two aircraft are indeed now being converted.
SFOTurtle is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2011, 1:14 am
  #165  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 52
Originally Posted by Bitterroot
941 is not a 744. It's protected by a 772 -- usually one of the four reconfigured 77Ds.
That's what I would have thought, too, but then I saw this:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL941

I was trying to see if the flight flew over the Alps (I suspected not, but I wanted to check anyhow) and then saw the 744 on the route.

If what you say is true, then I'll probably end up taking 941 back to the States and guessing on a seat.
Tigerotor77W is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.