43m Domestic connection with TSA Pre + Carry-on only?
43m connection UA->UA (SFO-IAD, IAD-BOS). Only carry on. I have TSA Pre. Doable?
|
Originally Posted by legionnaire
(Post 33988858)
43m connection UA->UA (SFO-IAD, IAD-BOS). Only carry on. I have TSA Pre. Doable?
|
Originally Posted by legionnaire
(Post 33988858)
43m connection UA->UA (SFO-IAD, IAD-BOS). Only carry on. I have TSA Pre. Doable?
-RM |
Originally Posted by RobOnLI
(Post 33990130)
You'll be staying between terminals C & D which are connected in one long hallway. The only chance you have to leave is if IAD-BOS is not operated by mainline and you wind up possibly having to go to A or Z (unlikely). And as someone else pointed out, TSA Pre means nothing here since you aren't going through security at IAD.
-RM |
I->D at Dulles, UA->UAX, arriving at 2:25 with a 2:10 layover, and it’s the last onward flight of the night. Checked bags, GE, TSA pre. How big a risk is this?
Thanks in advance! |
Originally Posted by iplaybass
(Post 34043626)
I->D at Dulles, UA->UAX, arriving at 2:25 with a 2:10 layover, and it’s the last onward flight of the night. Checked bags, GE, TSA pre. How big a risk is this?
Thanks in advance! |
You'll be fine.
|
DEN-IAD-LHR later this month with 35m connection as a GS (the non-stop isn't running on the day I need). How likely is this to go bad?
|
Originally Posted by Scifience
(Post 34062332)
DEN-IAD-LHR later this month with 35m connection as a GS (the non-stop isn't running on the day I need). How likely is this to go bad?
|
Originally Posted by JimInOhio
(Post 34062413)
Is that a legal connection? ...
But very high risk |
Originally Posted by JimInOhio
(Post 34062413)
Is that a legal connection? I'm not sure you'll find many here who would book that. That said, it looks like UA is holding TATL flights for connecting passengers (even saw one that was held a hour) but I don't think I would do this one. What about ORD or EWR?
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 34062503)
mainline UA to mainline UA IAD DI MCT (with a few exceptions) is .35 !!!:eek:
But very high risk There is DEN-EWR-LHR, with a 64m connection, but given the EWR mess, I'm really not sure that's preferable... |
Originally Posted by Scifience
(Post 34062698)
... There is DEN-EWR-LHR, with a 64m connection, but given the EWR mess, I'm really not sure that's preferable...
|
Originally Posted by Scifience
(Post 34062698)
Thanks, both. This is what I expected; sadly, the other options really don't seem much better, so I may end up taking my chances and writing in to GS to ask them to have someone meet me for the connection.
There is DEN-EWR-LHR, with a 64m connection, but given the EWR mess, I'm really not sure that's preferable... |
Originally Posted by goodeats21
(Post 34062711)
Depending on timing of day, the EWR might be preferred if only to have backup options if you misconnect. I would factor in recovery options into your overall evaluation.
|
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 34062705)
IMO 64 minutes DI in EWR is far better 35 minutes IAD
Taxi time from landing to gate is much faster at IAD then EWR. I’ve had more snags at EWR over IAD. Flow control into EWR is an issue too.. I’ve noticed earlier arrivals at IAD vs EWR too (albeit my origin was LAX) If you’re going D to D or D to C or something like that at IAD you won’t have an issue, especially with alerting GS |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:18 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.