FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   New IFE Flight path limitations on some 737s (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/2159985-new-ife-flight-path-limitations-some-737s.html)

pbr6891 May 3, 2024 3:24 pm

New IFE Flight path limitations on some 737s
 
On some of the newer IFE the Flight path feature allows to choose different view points .. including the cool cockpit view including heads up display ...

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...5a53c5d7a8.jpg
Does anyone knows why some of the views including this one cant be selected during approach/landing (below 10000feet ...) ?

is it because some of the view can cause discomfort for some passenger ... high speed / low altitude .. ?

WineCountryUA May 3, 2024 3:53 pm

Security concerns?

ryman554 May 3, 2024 3:56 pm

On ANA you can. It's just a graphic anyhow. Not 3D or anything.

But i do like the landing gear one. Is that available on UA?

mahasamatman May 3, 2024 4:17 pm

I've found that every airline I've flown recently has done this. I'm sure it's all in the name of security.

econ May 3, 2024 4:53 pm


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 36208409)
Security concerns?


Originally Posted by mahasamatman (Post 36208445)
I've found that every airline I've flown recently has done this. I'm sure it's all in the name of security.

What's the rationale? Some other carriers have actual cameras that one can view throughout the entire flight.

WineCountryUA May 3, 2024 5:14 pm


Originally Posted by econ (Post 36208502)
What's the rationale? Some other carriers have actual cameras that one can view throughout the entire flight.

Trying not to go OMNI on this, but some may feel there is much more identifiable info on the provided example.
I have no idea of the objection or agreeing, but rather just threw it out as a possibly. But let's not get into a OMNI debate on security, this is not the place for that.
Please offer an alternative suggestion

econ May 3, 2024 5:32 pm

Ok fine. I guess I'll consider myself lucky that it's still allowed to keep the window shades open during takeoff/landing.

Actually, it never would have crossed my mind that it was for the reason mentioned. I figured it was because the IFE system didn't have the capability to generate a realistic graphic at low altitudes.

WineCountryUA May 3, 2024 5:37 pm


Originally Posted by econ (Post 36208556)
... Actually, it never would have crossed my mind that it was for the reason mentioned. I figured it was because the IFE system didn't have the capability to generate a realistic graphic at low altitudes.

Did not think of that, very plausible

DataPlumber May 3, 2024 6:36 pm


Originally Posted by mahasamatman (Post 36208445)
I've found that every airline I've flown recently has done this. I'm sure it's all in the name of security.

Poorly written software, limited local storage, and limiting the amount data to reproduce the terrain views at various heights of the flight....

naaaaah... The horror if it was true. ;)

Repooc17 May 4, 2024 7:17 am


Originally Posted by ryman554 (Post 36208416)
On ANA you can. It's just a graphic anyhow. Not 3D or anything.

But i do like the landing gear one. Is that available on UA?

You mean outside cameras? Not available on UA.

Say Vandelay May 4, 2024 10:04 am


Originally Posted by DataPlumber (Post 36208643)
Poorly written software, limited local storage, and limiting the amount data to reproduce the terrain views at various heights of the flight....

Agreed. The data is way too low res. Flight simulator really heats up my GPU when close to the ground but frame rate soars when above 10k.

bocastephen May 4, 2024 1:55 pm

Not sure I understand the security concern here other than perhaps clueless bureaucrats? I can easily reproduce the same information on my phone using faster wifi (ok, not on United), google maps satellite view, iPhone compass for altitude, and I'm sure there are other apps that would show more detail to bring everything together in one screen.

The same silliness that causes some crews to refuse Ch9, even though I can just listen on my phone through the LiveATC app

Delta has a similar feature in their IFE, but the views were not disabled - however the information wasn't exactly that accurate.

eng3 May 4, 2024 2:20 pm


Originally Posted by Say Vandelay (Post 36209655)
Agreed. The data is way too low res. Flight simulator really heats up my GPU when close to the ground but frame rate soars when above 10k.

Exactly my thought.

Also, the "security" argument is probably more of a "privacy" argument. Though since people can look out the window and satellite and streetview is available online, I don't know about that argument.

I think they just have a satellite map of the world loaded in memory somewhere. The amount of storage needed goes up exponentially as you zoom in. So they cut of off somewhere and then use "digital zoom" to get closer. Ofcourse you can't zoom in forever or it would look terrible so they set a limit.

A video camera (like other airlines) would be much cooler.

I'd happily give up all that if they'd just get working Ch9 again. Thus far, I have not successfully been able to follow a complete flight using liveATC. The map display is something I can easily reproduce in greater detail and accuracy on my phone.

hhdl May 5, 2024 5:41 am


Originally Posted by bocastephen (Post 36210110)
Delta has a similar feature in their IFE, but the views were not disabled - however the information wasn't exactly that accurate.

DL definitely turns off the cockpit, etc. views at 10k feet. AF likewise, although exterior cameras remain on from gate to gate.

bocastephen May 5, 2024 11:37 am


Originally Posted by hhdl (Post 36211251)
DL definitely turns off the cockpit, etc. views at 10k feet. AF likewise, although exterior cameras remain on from gate to gate.

Well 🤷🏼‍♂️ not on the two Delta flights I was on last month. Maybe they need to be turned off manually?

The whole thing makes no sense at all.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.