Originally Posted by fumje
(Post 25984441)
How do I view fare rules on .com? I'd always figured it should be there somewhere, but I have never been able to find a link.
|
Originally Posted by fumje
(Post 25984441)
edit: But to clarify my original question—I was interpreting mherdeg's final paragraph as meaning that although no CDG-EWR discount economy fares were offered, searching for a CDG-HNL with stopover in EWR might allow purchase of the CDG-EWR in a lower-priced fare bucket. Is that not the case? Or is there just no straightforward way to figure out the latter knowing only knowing CDG-EWR fare rules?
Now that V fare may allow for a stopover, or allow a stopover for a minimal cost. In that case, you could get on the CDG-EWR flight, stop for 2 days, and then go onward to HNL on a V fare. |
Originally Posted by fumje
(Post 25984441)
But to clarify my original question—I was interpreting mherdeg's final paragraph as meaning that although no CDG-EWR discount economy fares were offered, searching for a CDG-HNL with stopover in EWR might allow purchase of the CDG-EWR in a lower-priced fare bucket. Is that not the case? Or is there just no straightforward way to figure out the latter knowing only knowing CDG-EWR fare rules?
The only easy way to find that kind of fare is to use a site like Skiplagged that searches for hidden city itineraries. Because that's essentially hidden city logic. |
You can use Expert Flyer (if you have a subscription) to search what fares are possible between your city pairs and then look into the restrictions of each to see if they could work for you. Then search availability of those buckets on united.com and see if you can get those specific fare types to come up. They still may not due to other not so obvious restrictions.
|
Originally Posted by dmodemd
(Post 25985737)
You can use Expert Flyer (if you have a subscription) to search what fares are possible between your city pairs and then look into the restrictions of each to see if they could work for you. Then search availability of those buckets on united.com and see if you can get those specific fare types to come up. They still may not due to other not so obvious restrictions.
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 25985089)
Sure, but that's a different question. In that circumstance, the K is not offered for sale CDG-EWR. It's offered CDG-HNL, and may allow a stopover in EWR, ORD, SFO, etc. But that's not a CDG-EWR fare.
The only easy way to find that kind of fare is to use a site like Skiplagged that searches for hidden city itineraries. Because that's essentially hidden city logic.
Originally Posted by emcampbe
(Post 25985039)
Correct - fares are generally done origin to destination, unless it's cheaper to have a fare break, where the site might bring that up. While Y might be the cheapest published fare on CDG-EWR for a one-way, CDG-HNL may have a published One way V fare which starts with the same CDG - EWR flight. That's where the buckets come in - while they aren't willing to sell a one-way V fare just to EWR one - way (after all, there's no V published allowing one-way), they may be willing to sell one to someone going to another destination, but makes a connection in EWR.
Now that V fare may allow for a stopover, or allow a stopover for a minimal cost. In that case, you could get on the CDG-EWR flight, stop for 2 days, and then go onward to HNL on a V fare.
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 25984469)
Click through "View Fare Rules and Restrictions" after you've selected your flights.
|
Difficulties booking Q fares TATL
I've been looking for travel from the West Coast to TXL, and ua.com consistently refuses to show me any Q fares on weekend days. The phone agents were also unable to get this to price, but were not sure why.
Strangely, I can see Q availability both on UA.com and on expertflyer. I used to do this route monthly last year, in Q, with no problems. Travel is on a combination of UA and LH. Did the fare rules change, or what am I missing here? As a follow-up, how would I go about checking the fare rules for specific examples? As always, your insights are greatly appreciated. |
would be strange to NOT have a Q-fare filed, but perhaps your dates or min stay restrictions don't allow a Q-fare? Did you check EF?
|
Fare rules change all the time. If there is a Q fare (no guarantee), it sounds like your travel plans don't match the requirements.
|
Originally Posted by itsMoe
(Post 26143010)
I've been looking for travel from the West Coast to TXL, and ua.com consistently refuses to show me any Q fares on weekend days. The phone agents were also unable to get this to price, but were not sure why.
UA+ / f bc=q Any seasonality, length of stay, and advanced purchase requirements for the fare still need to be observed. http://i1154.photobucket.com/albums/...pstatppsbl.png |
Originally Posted by itsMoe
(Post 26143010)
Strangely, I can see Q availability both on UA.com and on expertflyer.
|
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
(Post 26143159)
Try looking for availability of itineraries with ITA Matrix fare code force. In advanced routing codes fields, add (in both directions if that's what you want):
UA+ / f bc=q Any seasonality, length of stay, and advanced purchase requirements for the fare still need to be observed.
Originally Posted by mduell
You need more than Q booking class availability to book in Q: you also need an eligible fare.
|
Originally Posted by itsMoe
(Post 26162799)
I have to admit, I'm a bit out of my depth here. Would you mind elaborating on this a little? Thank you!
For example, if you are looking to go SFO-TXL, there needs to be Q availability for SFO-TXL, as well as a valid Q fare. If there is no Q fare on SFO-TXL, then it will price you up to the next bucket that is available and has a fare. Note that even if there is Q availability and a Q fare filed on individual segments, it might not be available from your origin to destination. So there may separately be Q availability on SFO-IAD and IAD-TXL, but not SFO-TXL, even on the same flights (this is called married segment availability). There may also be a Q fare filed for SFO-IAD and IAD-TXL, but no Q fare filed SFO-TXL. There could be both Q availability and a Q fare, but if you aren't meeting the rules of the fare, it will bump you up to the next level where you do meet the rules. For example, some fares will require a Saturday night stay, so if you are planning your trip outbound Monday and return on Thursday, and the rules of the filed Q fare require a Sat. night stay, you'll go to the next fare level. Or, the Q fare may only be offered on flights Mon-Wed. In which case you may get a Q fare outbound, and a different on the return. Or, the Q fare may not be combinable with the lowest return fare, so it bumps up both segments. Also possible that a "higher" fare class actually has a lower fare - this happens sometimes too. As you can see, there are many possible scenarios, so just because Q>1, doesn't mean a Q fare will be offered. |
That was really helpful, thank you for the explanation!
|
Encountering a strange one today.
Looking for a simple DAY->ORD trip. It will not offer me a First Class cabin fare even though F=9. The column "First (lowest)" just says not available. Only economy is available...though R=9 as well. Did they really not file any type of First Class cabin fare for this date? Other dates have FC available. :confused: Stupid United.:td: |
Originally Posted by goodeats21
(Post 26173666)
Looking for a simple DAY->ORD trip. It will not offer me a First Class cabin fare even though F=9. The column "First (lowest)" just says not available. Only economy is available...though R=9 as well.
|
Originally Posted by goodeats21
(Post 26173666)
Did they really not file any type of First Class cabin fare for this date? Other dates have FC available. :confused:
|
Originally Posted by goodeats21
(Post 26173666)
Encountering a strange one today.
Looking for a simple DAY->ORD trip. It will not offer me a First Class cabin fare even though F=9. The column "First (lowest)" just says not available. Only economy is available...though R=9 as well. Did they really not file any type of First Class cabin fare for this date? Other dates have FC available. :confused: Stupid United.:td: |
I can't swear to the original dates as I was plunking around a bit looking for a weekend getaway. For a short time, economy was pricing out at $50 one-way, which is crazy low for that route historically.
I didn't find anything for the weekends I was contemplating, but did go ahead and book a business trip. Boss will not believe the $100 air fare for the round trip I will be submitting on the expense report. Usually more like $400 Seems like it might have been a temporary glitch as the FC fares are back now. Also the economy fares have gone up significantly. |
Originally Posted by goodeats21
(Post 26176543)
Seems like it might have been a temporary glitch as the FC fares are back now. Also the economy fares have gone up significantly.
|
Are some fare classes dependent of days of travel?
Hi all...i am booking a SFO-KIX-SFO trip Oct 13-16. Yes a very short trip so really want an upgrade. Using GPU this seems to only want to book into Q even tho I see W fares listed on site under "details". I called an agent who said there were no Ws. Are these fare classes only available sometimes - like 7 day trip, or low demand days, or am I doing something wrong. Ticket prices at $1,900....
|
There is no W fare filed that matches your flights.
In order to book a ticket in any given fare class, there needs to be both inventory and an applicable fare. |
of course. Fare class available doesn't mean there is a fare available. Many cheaper fares have restrictions. This is very common.
|
Originally Posted by 1k-all-the-way
(Post 26725049)
Hi all...i am booking a SFO-KIX-SFO trip Oct 13-16. Yes a very short trip so really want an upgrade. Using GPU this seems to only want to book into Q even tho I see W fares listed on site under "details". I called an agent who said there were no Ws. Are these fare classes only available sometimes - like 7 day trip, or low demand days, or am I doing something wrong. Ticket prices at $1,900....
You need -- a filed fare basis -- meet all the fare rules of that fare basis -- inventory for that fare basis only then can you purchase a particular fare basis. |
In this case, there aren't even any published fares lower than Q. SFO-KIX seems to consistently command high fares. Consider stopping in ICN one of the directions - this will give you lower fares (fares as SFO to SEL with stopover in OSA).
|
Thanks everybody...I always learn here....and much more than what the agent was able to tell me.
I can see a W through HND on the way back the prices about $400 less but am can't take it , since I have 48 hours on the ground in KIX and head to Paris within a few hours of landing back at SFO from the KIX flight..... At least my CDG flight upgrade cleared already! |
Originally Posted by 1k-all-the-way
(Post 26726013)
Thanks everybody...I always learn here....and much more than what the agent was able to tell me
|
expert mode question.
So the flight I am looking at has K9, G9, N9 on expert mode. Why is that flight sold with K as the lowest fare , but not G or N fare? If lower fare such as G or N has 9 or more seats available, shouldn't that flight sell at lower fare than K?
|
My understanding is that there is no applicable fare filed, even though the fare classes are available.
|
Can also be that G or N would be valid if your flight was part of a connection with the final destination having a fare filed in those classes, hence the availability is loaded for your segment to be sold in conjunction with another ..
|
Originally Posted by uclacolumbiaunc
(Post 26875095)
So the flight I am looking at has K9, G9, N9 on expert mode. Why is that flight sold with K as the lowest fare , but not G or N fare? If lower fare such as G or N has 9 or more seats available, shouldn't that flight sell at lower fare than K?
From the thread's wiki There are three requirements to be able to book a fare class 1) there needs to be a fare rule for that fare class for those O/D. 2) you need to meet all the requirements for the fare rule -- advance purchase, days of the week, min stay, qualified flight numbers, qualified routing (including a possible RT requirement), ..... 3) there needs to be inventory in the fare class |
Originally Posted by uclacolumbiaunc
(Post 26875095)
So the flight I am looking at has K9, G9, N9 on expert mode. Why is that flight sold with K as the lowest fare , but not G or N fare? If lower fare such as G or N has 9 or more seats available, shouldn't that flight sell at lower fare than K?
|
Why do you need those fares?
|
G and N are sale fares, very rarely offered.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 26875611)
G and N are sale fares, very rarely offered.
|
Unable to book P fare
Looking for a trip to Australia in December. I can see the P bucket is at P5. When I go to the requested fare class it says it's not available. (It prices the business as full fare C or D) Same situation on LAX-SYD.
Any suggestions? https://s9.postimg.cc/4whlk538f/image.png |
To book a ticket, you not only need availability in the P bucket, but United needs to have filed a P fare for that city pair, and your trip must meet all the requirements such as length of stay.
|
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 27052319)
To book a ticket, you not only need availability in the P bucket, but United needs to have filed a P fare for that city pair, and your trip must meet all the requirements such as length of stay.
|
Originally Posted by findark
(Post 27052373)
Indeed. There are currently n:eek:ne filed in either market.
|
Originally Posted by Seby12
(Post 27052377)
Where can I check this by market, like you did.
|
Fare bucket question
I'm using united.com to book a one-way flight in early Jan that currently shows the following availability:
Available fare classes: F9 A7 JN9 C9 D7 Z4 ZN4 P3 PN0 R0 RN0 IN0 I0 Y9 YN9 B9 M9 E9 U9 H9 HN9 Q9 V9 W9 S7 T5 L2 K0 G0 N9 XN0 X0 When the fare comes up, the "lowest" fare available for booking is "Q;" no option to book a V, W, S, or T fare (which would presumably be less expensive). Are those fares available somewhere else besides united.com? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.