2000 PQP away from 1K qualification - Worth it to try to get the status?
#46
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 4,989
In order to support 22 upgrades to Polaris from Y, you needed at least 880 PlusPoints. Earning those requires near-GS level spend. Someone who is asking whether or not to spend an extra $2K to qualify isn’t going to have 880 PlusPoints. They’ll have 280 plus the 40 they already got from Platinum.
I’m just saying, even though OP stated that they have enough flexibility to use PlusPoints, laying out $2K is a steep price to pay for something that’s not guaranteed. UA could decide, tomorrow, to zero out PZ for the rest of the year. (And before you say they probably won’t, although I agree — for some routes, PZ0 across the board is already a reality).
Finally, the simple fact of the matter is that, for most people, if you didn’t have PlusPoints, or enough miles to use a MUA, or thought the copay was too pricy — the alternative isn’t paying UA’s full Polaris fare. The alternative is flying Y or not flying at all. In fact, you could make a coherent argument that 1K is worth less than $0, because you may spend more on purchases next year to take advantage of the PlusPoints you’ve earned. Of course, this values the marginal travel at $0, which isn’t really fair, but in terms of fiscal impact, it’s defensible.
I’m just saying, even though OP stated that they have enough flexibility to use PlusPoints, laying out $2K is a steep price to pay for something that’s not guaranteed. UA could decide, tomorrow, to zero out PZ for the rest of the year. (And before you say they probably won’t, although I agree — for some routes, PZ0 across the board is already a reality).
Finally, the simple fact of the matter is that, for most people, if you didn’t have PlusPoints, or enough miles to use a MUA, or thought the copay was too pricy — the alternative isn’t paying UA’s full Polaris fare. The alternative is flying Y or not flying at all. In fact, you could make a coherent argument that 1K is worth less than $0, because you may spend more on purchases next year to take advantage of the PlusPoints you’ve earned. Of course, this values the marginal travel at $0, which isn’t really fair, but in terms of fiscal impact, it’s defensible.
Those who have wide flexibility in travel destinations/dates/times, or who don't mind flying in Y if their UG fails, are able to use PPs more effectively. Those of us who are locked-in with our travel dates and destinations find them almost useless. I am not one that is willing to fly multiple connections and extra hours in Y to get an UG on an international flight e.g. an itinerary from EWR-SFO in Y and SFO-NRT in PZ. Thus, a lot of my spend goes to other carriers that have a better routing or price than UA. Loyalty to UA has little value to someone like myself. One could argue that you could get rid of excess PPs on CC and thereby get some benefit from them, but that seems way too risky these days. I don't want to get cancelled by UA.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,450
In order to support 22 upgrades to Polaris from Y, you needed at least 880 PlusPoints. Earning those requires near-GS level spend. Someone who is asking whether or not to spend an extra $2K to qualify isn’t going to have 880 PlusPoints. They’ll have 280 plus the 40 they already got from Platinum.
I’m just saying, even though OP stated that they have enough flexibility to use PlusPoints, laying out $2K is a steep price to pay for something that’s not guaranteed. UA could decide, tomorrow, to zero out PZ for the rest of the year. (And before you say they probably won’t, although I agree — for some routes, PZ0 across the board is already a reality).
Finally, the simple fact of the matter is that, for most people, if you didn’t have PlusPoints, or enough miles to use a MUA, or thought the copay was too pricy — the alternative isn’t paying UA’s full Polaris fare. The alternative is flying Y or not flying at all. In fact, you could make a coherent argument that 1K is worth less than $0, because you may spend more on purchases next year to take advantage of the PlusPoints you’ve earned. Of course, this values the marginal travel at $0, which isn’t really fair, but in terms of fiscal impact, it’s defensible.
I’m just saying, even though OP stated that they have enough flexibility to use PlusPoints, laying out $2K is a steep price to pay for something that’s not guaranteed. UA could decide, tomorrow, to zero out PZ for the rest of the year. (And before you say they probably won’t, although I agree — for some routes, PZ0 across the board is already a reality).
Finally, the simple fact of the matter is that, for most people, if you didn’t have PlusPoints, or enough miles to use a MUA, or thought the copay was too pricy — the alternative isn’t paying UA’s full Polaris fare. The alternative is flying Y or not flying at all. In fact, you could make a coherent argument that 1K is worth less than $0, because you may spend more on purchases next year to take advantage of the PlusPoints you’ve earned. Of course, this values the marginal travel at $0, which isn’t really fair, but in terms of fiscal impact, it’s defensible.
#48
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 139
I understand that this works differently for many other people, but I wouldn't summarily dismiss it without running some actual numbers.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,357
If you think it’s worth a $2K investment to you personally, and you don’t value your time in searching, or making extra connections, or traveling on non-preferred days, at all, and you are willing to absorb the risk of PlusPoints expiring, so be it — it’s your money, and UA will happily take it. But, even though I’ve also been able to use all of my PlusPoints, I am absolutely applying a valuation tax when I make my own decisions.
#50
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AC 25K, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 436
For me it's not worth it. I ended 2022 about 2500 PQP short of 1K. My travel is almost all domestic. With let's say an average cash upgrade price of $300, I can buy 8 cash upgrades in 2023 for the $2500 I would have had to spend to get 280 PPs. However, unlike PP upgrades, which are almost always waitlist only on the flights I book, cash upgrades can be confirmed instantly. On those few occasions when I've tried to waitlist for PP upgrades on domestic flights, I've ended up flying in economy. Thanks, but no thanks.
#51
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 139
I have indeed not. We took our last trip on upgrades about 3 weeks ago (Christmas Markets in Germany !). I just checked and there is good availability for next week as well, if I wanted go again soon. I agree, that it's a bit of gamble, but for some reason availability on my frequent routes appears to be consistently good (within my personal constraints). Many people have a different set of constraints which makes this a lot less attractive so I guess everyone needs to figure out their own "devaluation" factor based on their own specific situation. But so far I had not trouble putting my Plus Points to effective use (knock on wood).