DEN-HDN yesterday, 61 minute scheduled flight, no drink service or anything in first. FA never left her seat in the galley except her walk thru to pick up sanitary wipe trash. ッ\_(ツ)_/ッ
|
Originally Posted by threecap
(Post 33892631)
DEN-HDN yesterday, 61 minute scheduled flight, no drink service or anything in first. FA never left her seat in the galley except her walk thru to pick up sanitary wipe trash. ッ\_(ツ)_/ッ
|
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
(Post 33892890)
SkyWest? IME, SkyWest has gone from first to worst in terms of regionals. Such lazy FAs and lame "short duration" excuses to avoid service.
David |
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
(Post 33892890)
SkyWest? IME, SkyWest has gone from first to worst in terms of regionals. Such lazy FAs and lame "short duration" excuses to avoid service.
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 33892899)
That was my immediate thought as well. Just a question of which UX carrier.
David |
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
(Post 33892890)
SkyWest? IME, SkyWest has gone from first to worst in terms of regionals. Such lazy FAs and lame "short duration" excuses to avoid service.
|
Originally Posted by dilanesp
(Post 33893052)
Short duration is an excellent reason for a lower level of service
here is my breakfast on a narrow body business class flight on Swiss with a 35 minute duration. You enjoy those excuses, I値l enjoy better service on more friendly skies. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...17c16a2e0.jpeg |
Originally Posted by bocastephen
(Post 33893738)
here is my breakfast on a narrow body business class flight on Swiss with a 35 minute duration. You enjoy those excuses, I値l enjoy better service on more friendly skies.
|
Originally Posted by bocastephen
(Post 33893738)
only on United perhaps but not other airlines around the world
here is my breakfast on a narrow body business class flight on Swiss with a 35 minute duration. You enjoy those excuses, I値l enjoy better service on more friendly skies. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...17c16a2e0.jpeg I can go to a restaurant after a 35 minute flight and get a nice breakfast, and not have to gulp it down in 20 minutes. What's the point of this? The symbolism of free food? Is this really of any importance? |
Originally Posted by dilanesp
(Post 33893891)
Show me the wide First Class seat you got on that 35 minute flight, and the extra legroom, and the personal device entertainment you got.
I can go to a restaurant after a 35 minute flight and get a nice breakfast, and not have to gulp it down in 20 minutes. What's the point of this? The symbolism of free food? Is this really of any importance? United couldn't even offer this even if it had tried. Most lazy FAs would need at least an hour on average to heat up food. On a flight last year, I didn't get my meal until we were getting ready to descend (and no, we didn't have any material turbulence which required FAs to suspend services). A few minutes after being handed the tray, FAs came around multiple times to "check" on my progress. Inflight services may not be of importance to you, but others may have different priorities. Some people pay premium to for differentiated/elevated services more than just transportation from A to B. |
Originally Posted by dilanesp
(Post 33893891)
Show me the wide First Class seat you got on that 35 minute flight, and the extra legroom, and the personal device entertainment you got.
I can go to a restaurant after a 35 minute flight and get a nice breakfast, and not have to gulp it down in 20 minutes. What's the point of this? The symbolism of free food? Is this really of any importance? |
Originally Posted by chrisny2
(Post 33893949)
I think the previous poster's point is that while United obviously won't serve a breakfast like that, they had no excuse not to offer First Class a round of drinks.
At this point it's just excuses. David |
Originally Posted by bocastephen
(Post 33893738)
only on United perhaps but not other airlines around the world
here is my breakfast on a narrow body business class flight on Swiss with a 35 minute duration. You enjoy those excuses, I値l enjoy better service on more friendly skies. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...17c16a2e0.jpeg |
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
(Post 33892890)
SkyWest? IME, SkyWest has gone from first to worst in terms of regionals. Such lazy FAs and lame "short duration" excuses to avoid service.
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 33892899)
That was my immediate thought as well. Just a question of which UX carrier.
Originally Posted by threecap
(Post 33892926)
yep, Skywest. Terrible.
|
Originally Posted by HNLbasedFlyer
(Post 33894097)
Cant wait to check that out when SWISS flies from Honolulu. The fascination with foreign airlines when most of us fly domestically is - fascinating. SWISS is not a competitor to any US airline flying US domestic.
International or domestic is irrelevant. The comparison of two regional aircraft, an A220 in this case, flying a short flight between business centers most certainly is relevant. |
Originally Posted by HNLbasedFlyer
(Post 33894097)
Cant wait to check that out when SWISS flies from Honolulu. The fascination with foreign airlines when most of us fly domestically is - fascinating. SWISS is not a competitor to any US airline flying US domestic.
Sitting there in your UA seat ORD-IND stewing about how you'd get a breakfast on a ZRH-FRA flight is pointless. A person will have a long wait if they expect UA (or any domestic) to start mirroring non-competitors on other continents on routes they don't fly. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:19 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.