Upgrades vs lounge access as an UA elite benefit?
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Chicago
Programs: ,united 1k, AA EXP, HH Diamond,BA gold, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 974
Upgrades vs lounge access as an UA elite benefit?
I have always been curious on others opinions on lounge access vs upgrades. In Europe they don’t give out any complimentary upgrades but do give out some upgrade carts. However they prioritize lounge access giving mid tier elites and above access to business class and first class lounges or better for them and a guest. So would you rather have lounge access so golds and platinums got United club access on every flight for them and a guest but no CPUs. Furthermore 1ks and global services getting access to the Polaris lounges on every flights for them and a guest but no CPUs and fewer plus points. Silvers still get nothing😀.
#2
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,759
It is easy to purchase domestic UC access for $500, would not get you very far on upgrades for the same amount. AND it would lead to even more crowsing in normal times. The UC system is not sized for this.
Expanded PL access will just overrun the PLs and greatly diminish the experience defeating the intent of the PLs
CPUs cost UA very little and having to increase the size of the lounges would cost a bundle.
Expanded PL access will just overrun the PLs and greatly diminish the experience defeating the intent of the PLs
CPUs cost UA very little and having to increase the size of the lounges would cost a bundle.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Mar 21, 2021 at 7:53 pm
#3
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,368
another way to reword this is
inventory expires when airplane takes off - so might as well give seat away to make customer happy (or upsell it as United does via ToD)
lounge doesn't expire - and as @WineCountryUA mentioned above, you have to stock more food/coffee/... and overcrowding
in Europe, some (not all though) of their "domestic" business class seats is just the same coach 3x3 layout, with middle seat blocked (and a movable curtain to separate the two)
https://thepointsguy.com/2015/08/europe-business-class/
https://onemileatatime.com/british-a...s-class-table/
not really much incentive for an upgrade (and airline can choose to "remove" business seats and sell more economy seats if needed). of course intra-europe business can still get better/free food
as to why europe gives away lounge access without the overcrowding issue, anyone chime in?
inventory expires when airplane takes off - so might as well give seat away to make customer happy (or upsell it as United does via ToD)
lounge doesn't expire - and as @WineCountryUA mentioned above, you have to stock more food/coffee/... and overcrowding
in Europe, some (not all though) of their "domestic" business class seats is just the same coach 3x3 layout, with middle seat blocked (and a movable curtain to separate the two)
https://thepointsguy.com/2015/08/europe-business-class/
https://onemileatatime.com/british-a...s-class-table/
not really much incentive for an upgrade (and airline can choose to "remove" business seats and sell more economy seats if needed). of course intra-europe business can still get better/free food
as to why europe gives away lounge access without the overcrowding issue, anyone chime in?
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Who knows where post-pandemic European carriers wind up. Entirely possible that the included lounge goes the way the domestic F lounge went in the US.
I would put all of this on hold until 2024 and then see what is out there.
I would put all of this on hold until 2024 and then see what is out there.
#5
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Chicago
Programs: ,united 1k, AA EXP, HH Diamond,BA gold, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 974
Europe is able to handle this because they don't sell memberships. secondly I would argue most golds and platinums don't get 500 dollars in cpus in normal time.CPUs for golds and platinums in hubs were so rare.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,453
Personally, I like being in the air, but not so much the ground experience. I'd spend the least amount of time in the airport, such as getting to the airport at boarding time. Maybe it's the overall poor lounge experience (including PL), and just people in general.
#7
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Chicago
Programs: ,united 1k, AA EXP, HH Diamond,BA gold, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 974
It is easy to purchase domestic UC access for $500, would not get you very far on upgrades for the same amount. AND it would lead to even more crowsing in normal times. The UC system is not sized for this.
Expanded PL access will just overrun the PLs and greatly diminish the experience defeating the intent of the PLs
CPUs cost UA very little and having to increase the size of the lounges would cost a bundle.
Expanded PL access will just overrun the PLs and greatly diminish the experience defeating the intent of the PLs
CPUs cost UA very little and having to increase the size of the lounges would cost a bundle.
#8
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,759
Not a GS, but thought a lot of GS use their upgrades for family and/or vacations -- giving those up of domestic only travel access to PL seems pretty steep tradeoff (and difficult to explain to the home team)
With their UC access, is PL on domestic worth that tradeoff?? Most are too busy to lounge around the PL. Again, not a GS.
For my domestic travel, the club/lounge visits are generally short -- long connections are rare domestically.
With their UC access, is PL on domestic worth that tradeoff?? Most are too busy to lounge around the PL. Again, not a GS.
For my domestic travel, the club/lounge visits are generally short -- long connections are rare domestically.
#9
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: BOS/SFO
Programs: United 4MM GS, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 303
Not a GS, but thought a lot of GS use their upgrades for family and/or vacations -- giving those up of domestic only travel access to PL seems pretty steep tradeoff (and difficult to explain to the home team)
With their UC access, is PL on domestic worth that tradeoff?? Most are too busy to lounge around the PL. Again, not a GS.
For my domestic travel, the club/lounge visits are generally short -- long connections are rare domestically.
With their UC access, is PL on domestic worth that tradeoff?? Most are too busy to lounge around the PL. Again, not a GS.
For my domestic travel, the club/lounge visits are generally short -- long connections are rare domestically.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,350
I have zero interest in giving up CPUs in exchange for United lounge access.
I wouldn't even give up CPUs for United lounge access if United lounges were more like various international lounges.
And I live in a non-hub, so I'm often connecting. For people in a hub city, I assume the calculation is even more slanted -- I doubt most Premier members are getting to the airport well before their flight. (Some, yes, but I suspect most are trying to minimize the time spent at the airport, not maximize it).
I wouldn't even give up CPUs for United lounge access if United lounges were more like various international lounges.
And I live in a non-hub, so I'm often connecting. For people in a hub city, I assume the calculation is even more slanted -- I doubt most Premier members are getting to the airport well before their flight. (Some, yes, but I suspect most are trying to minimize the time spent at the airport, not maximize it).
#11
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SEA once more (previously CDG and NRT)
Programs: Former DL DM and UA 1k, now a J class free agent (UA Gold, AS MVP Gold)
Posts: 2,450
If they want to offer a new benefit for GS with regards to Polaris Lounge access, I’d say it should be Polaris Lounge Access on paid domestic F tickets - no guest privileges. Lounges would be able to handle it without much impact to crowding, and would be a meaningful benefit for GS folks.
#12
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ASE
Programs: UA 1MM, AA1MM PLTPRO, Hertz PC, National EXC, Hyatt Explorist, Hilton/Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 3,357
The reason most European carriers do this is because their countries are smaller and thus their domestic traffic is smaller than in the US. If flying internationally, elites would get lounge access (*G and above) anyway. I like the US system as it helps to reduce already over-crowded lounges anyway and offers a chance at a better seat (and some type of meal) on what could end up being a long flight domestically.
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Lounge space is limited. Free upgrade eligibility is unlimited. With CPU's, the lists just get that much longer and those at the bottom rarely or never get upgraded on routes that matter to them. When lounges get overcrowded, people stop going because you can get overcrowded yelling for free pretty much anywhere in an airport.
Lounges also have value for connecting passengers, but less and less value for HVC business traffic where the premium is on quick processing, e.g. dedicated check-in, Pre-Check and early boarding. Why go to the airport early?
Lounges also have value for connecting passengers, but less and less value for HVC business traffic where the premium is on quick processing, e.g. dedicated check-in, Pre-Check and early boarding. Why go to the airport early?
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,373
Flights are shorter in Europe because cities are generally closer together than they are in the US. Als, US carriers monetized lounges by selling memberships. That led the upgrades/club access equation to develop differently. I'm pretty happy with the CPU upgrades as a benefit, particularly as I have a lifetime UA Club membership.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,012
I don’t care either way. Normally my flying is all INTL so as 1K I get lounge access but I rarely visit a UC because of the crowds. CPUs are nice but my DOM legs are usually less than 2 hours so not a big deal.