UA Temporarily Grounds Boeing 772 (PW Power); returning to service: late May 2022
#91
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,850
You can track the recent history but the schedule placeholder will stay until 60-48 hours prior to departure. And it can still change after that. Things will get even more uncertain with the present grounding of the 24 UA 772s.
#92
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
UA has now zeroed inventory on my March 6 flight SFO-OGG, which is supposed to be on a Polarized 772, and has basically pulled the 772 flight (1273) off the market in subsequent weeks as well.
Given the slack in UA's long-haul fleet, I will be unbelievably pissed if they cancel or downgrade us.
Given the slack in UA's long-haul fleet, I will be unbelievably pissed if they cancel or downgrade us.
#93
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
UA has now zeroed inventory on my March 6 flight SFO-OGG, which is supposed to be on a Polarized 772, and has basically pulled the 772 flight (1273) off the market in subsequent weeks as well.
Given the slack in UA's long-haul fleet, I will be unbelievably pissed if they cancel or downgrade us.
Given the slack in UA's long-haul fleet, I will be unbelievably pissed if they cancel or downgrade us.
#94
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
#95
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morris County, NJ
Programs: UA 1K/*G, Avis Pres, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,305
UA has now zeroed inventory on my March 6 flight SFO-OGG, which is supposed to be on a Polarized 772, and has basically pulled the 772 flight (1273) off the market in subsequent weeks as well.
Given the slack in UA's long-haul fleet, I will be unbelievably pissed if they cancel or downgrade us.
Given the slack in UA's long-haul fleet, I will be unbelievably pissed if they cancel or downgrade us.
So it's not exactly slack -- it's a serious squeeze right now on the current fleet. The question is, what happens first: An Airworthiness Directive from the FAA for the PW4000 birds, or regenerating the GE90 fleet?
Edit: Oh, there's the AD above. I'd say the PW birds are likely to win the race. Whether it's before your March 6th departure or not -- that's the question.
#96
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
'
Per current AD:
"This AD requires performing a TAI inspection for cracks in certain 1st-stage LPC blades and removal of those blades that fail inspection"
It will be interesting to learn what timelines that requires, and if other ADs will follow.
"This AD requires performing a TAI inspection for cracks in certain 1st-stage LPC blades and removal of those blades that fail inspection"
It will be interesting to learn what timelines that requires, and if other ADs will follow.
#97
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PMD
Programs: UA*G, NW, AA-G. WR-P, HH-G, IHG-S, ALL. TT-GE.
Posts: 2,910
OK I'm seeing happy stories about HNL (28F becomes 60F and every last silver companion gets upgraded) and sad stories about OGG (772 downgauged to 738). Am I correct to conclude that the -300 is too big for OGG's longest runway?
#98
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
#99
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
#100
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SFO
Programs: UA MM Gold, AA Ex Plat, SPG Plat,Hyatt Diamond, Marriott Gold, National Executive Elite
Posts: 992
no there were a few times the last few months the 773 was subbed into OGG
#101
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
#102
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,450
My best guess is at least a week or two total grounding, with some aircraft gradually returning to service thereafter as their inspections are completed. The fact that P&W has to do the inspections at their shop in Connecticut makes the process more time-consuming. Full return to service could take a month or more.
Re-converting the 77F back to 77E standard should not be difficult (paperwork and removing ballast from aft galley) but reactivating a parked airplane from long-term storage is not an immediate process. Just today, N58101 (752) returned to service after over 5 weeks of fleet-return prep and maintenance.
There are 33 available 787-9 (2 in Polaris mod), 13 787-10s and 12 787-8; those that would be considered parked on the spreadsheet are actually in short-term storage, which is something like day-to-day parking. I would expect those airplanes to be returned to service ASAP, provided UA has enough pilots to staff that flying. The widebodies in long-term storage (desert) are 15/38 763s, 16/16 764, and 33/74 772 (plus N772UA OOS in DEN). Some of the aircraft in maintenance will return to storage.
Training is resuming for some pilots displaced out of 757/767 bases (such as EWR) to other fleets (737, A320, etc.). If the pilot is returning to a previous fleet, in most cases the training even will be just a few days, and then released to the line. We might see 757/767 picking up some of the slack starting next month.
Re-converting the 77F back to 77E standard should not be difficult (paperwork and removing ballast from aft galley) but reactivating a parked airplane from long-term storage is not an immediate process. Just today, N58101 (752) returned to service after over 5 weeks of fleet-return prep and maintenance.
Training is resuming for some pilots displaced out of 757/767 bases (such as EWR) to other fleets (737, A320, etc.). If the pilot is returning to a previous fleet, in most cases the training even will be just a few days, and then released to the line. We might see 757/767 picking up some of the slack starting next month.
Last edited by EWR764; Feb 24, 2021 at 10:03 am
#103
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: Once a somebody now a nobody
Posts: 514
Currently have an ORD-MCO flight for late next week supposedly being operated by a 777-200. We are in first (paid,) and don't really care if we get swapped to a non-lie flat seat if they change to a single aisle bird. What we do care about is being downgraded into a completely packed coach cabin. At this point do you think UA would allow us to change to the earlier flight with NO fare difference? I have no UA status and never seem to have much luck with the non-US bases agents at UA....so hate calling them unless i absolutely have to.
Last edited by chicago747; Feb 24, 2021 at 4:16 pm
#104
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
#105
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,450
It's an 'issue', but not exactly a problem like DL. By pulling down entire types at the top and bottom of the fleet (777 and M88/90), Delta created lots of displacements and the need for training events to get people qualified in new seats/fleets. IMO it was an opportune time for Delta to 'rip off the bandaid' even though there were some negative operational impacts.
UA had to absorb a lot of displacement, too, especially in the middle of the fleet (B756), but the top (777/787) stayed busy and fairly well-staffed through the pandemic due to the extensive all-cargo schedule, even considering the early-outs that were offered, specifically targeting those nearing retirement at the top of the scale.
The issue, of course, is not that the airline is understaffed (clearly, it's not) but there has been so much upheaval with leaves, retirement, movement and currency over the last year, against a backdrop of moving targets and goalposts, that it's difficult to do anything staffing-related in a relatively nimble manner.
UA had to absorb a lot of displacement, too, especially in the middle of the fleet (B756), but the top (777/787) stayed busy and fairly well-staffed through the pandemic due to the extensive all-cargo schedule, even considering the early-outs that were offered, specifically targeting those nearing retirement at the top of the scale.
The issue, of course, is not that the airline is understaffed (clearly, it's not) but there has been so much upheaval with leaves, retirement, movement and currency over the last year, against a backdrop of moving targets and goalposts, that it's difficult to do anything staffing-related in a relatively nimble manner.
Last edited by EWR764; Feb 24, 2021 at 11:23 am