UA Temporarily Grounds Boeing 772 (PW Power); returning to service: late May 2022
#661
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC / TYO / Up in the Air
Programs: UA GS 1.7MM, AA 2.1MM, EK, BA, SQ, CX, Marriot LT, Accor P
Posts: 6,315
#662
But airplane engines are absurdly expensive - c. $15-25M each.
#663
Join Date: Nov 2014
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 1,679
#664
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,125
My sympathies to my East Coast fellow UA travelers - those are some brutal cuts on longhaul routes for the summer season.
I’m surprised with TPAC still way down though they haven’t figured it out. Seems like any widebody doing domestic turns is an suboptimal use of the asset.
I’m surprised with TPAC still way down though they haven’t figured it out. Seems like any widebody doing domestic turns is an suboptimal use of the asset.
#665
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morris County, NJ
Programs: UA 1K/*G, Avis Pres, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,305
This is an interesting take, for sure. Would be curious how many airworthy 777's are idled right now around the globe. Heck, I wonder if any of the 763's that AA retired are airworthy? Wet leases, dry leases, both would be options ... question is - for how long, and would they turn a profit? If what JimInOhio mentioned around a second hydraulic problem being discovered is accurate... how far does that extend the grounding? All dartboard guesses at this point, I suppose.
Obviously most - if not all - of this is impractical, but it sure is fun to speculate.
I'm grateful DELee mentioned above how much work re-engining the UA 777's would be. On the surface, since the plane was available with multiple engine options, it sounds worth exploring ... but clearly not. Appreciate that clarity!
Obviously most - if not all - of this is impractical, but it sure is fun to speculate.
I'm grateful DELee mentioned above how much work re-engining the UA 777's would be. On the surface, since the plane was available with multiple engine options, it sounds worth exploring ... but clearly not. Appreciate that clarity!
#666
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
At the end of the day we are talking 7 routes - I struggle to call that a meltdown. The multiple times AA has literally cancelled thousands of flights, DL's well publicized call center issues, and even WN various multi-thousand cancellation days seem more "meltdown" worthy to me - at least one has advance notice with UA and can proactively reroute - when I was in Phoenix last month and my friend was heading back to Midway on Southwest and the flight was cancelled on a Sunday afternoon - not only could they not get her back that day - but the only option was next day with an arrival after 1am - that is a meltdown.
#667
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,020
Agree - it's not a meltdown, but the grounding of 52 wide-bodies has extensive impacts throughout the system. Think 52 planes x average load/flight x average segments/day = significant capacity cut. Granted, there's some routes that don't need to be flown now (certain Asian destinations or frequencies), but the impact is noticeable in fares / types of aircraft / capacity. Hawaii could turn into 737 hell this summer. With IAD/EWR non-stops to Hawaii out of the picture for the time being, Northeasterners are going to either forego Hawaii or eat into the alternate capacity to get there. Upgrades are going to be really tough this summer - I might stay in Honolulu for the summer
#668
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,125
This is an interesting take, for sure. Would be curious how many airworthy 777's are idled right now around the globe. Heck, I wonder if any of the 763's that AA retired are airworthy? Wet leases, dry leases, both would be options ... question is - for how long, and would they turn a profit? If what JimInOhio mentioned around a second hydraulic problem being discovered is accurate... how far does that extend the grounding? All dartboard guesses at this point, I suppose.
Obviously most - if not all - of this is impractical, but it sure is fun to speculate.
I'm grateful DELee mentioned above how much work re-engining the UA 777's would be. On the surface, since the plane was available with multiple engine options, it sounds worth exploring ... but clearly not. Appreciate that clarity!
Obviously most - if not all - of this is impractical, but it sure is fun to speculate.
I'm grateful DELee mentioned above how much work re-engining the UA 777's would be. On the surface, since the plane was available with multiple engine options, it sounds worth exploring ... but clearly not. Appreciate that clarity!
Realistically, it can take a lot to bring planes back that have been idle for so long and needing significant modifications. I’m also pretty sure they can’t go straight to ETOPS operations.
#669
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
#670
Join Date: Nov 2014
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 1,679
They don't need domestic revenue flights but they do require test flights out of storage. I think once you start seeing PW 777s out of VCV start to pop up you will know bringing them back will be imminent
#674
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC / TYO / Up in the Air
Programs: UA GS 1.7MM, AA 2.1MM, EK, BA, SQ, CX, Marriot LT, Accor P
Posts: 6,315