Should UA provide a premium travel option for leisure travelers: lounges, lieflats, …
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 20,061
Should UA provide a premium travel option for leisure travelers: lounges, lieflats, …
A 3rd-party operated lounge (or lounges) at ATL could contract out to handle AA and UA pax instead of each operating their own lounge in a DL hub. Or at FLL, one contract lounge for all carriers. I'd guess the domestic survivors for UA might be EWR, ORD, IAD, SFO, DEN, HNL, LAX, and (for convention traffic and a selfish yours truly ) LAS.
David
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jan 18, 2021 at 8:58 pm Reason: Pulled subthread out of lounge thread to start this discussion
#2
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,761
And the greater levels of traffic relatively to those cities are still well below that levels of a year ago and is mostly leisure travel, not business travel that UA had traditionally depended
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 20,061
This is going to go on for years. UA needs to adapt.
David
#4
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,761
Yes good be an interesting experiment to determining if a premium leisure traveler exists, while that might exists for a small portion of seniors. But my guess it would fail. No history exists to suggest this would work
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 20,061
A leisure, infrequent traveler forking out $500+ for a lounge with minimum service due to local requirements?
Running wide-bodies on leisure routines requires passenger volume and passengers willing to pay a premium for shorthaul flights. There is a market for 13-14 hour flights but for 2-3 hour flights? Especially routes where you are taking the kiddies?
Yes good be an interesting experiment to determining if a premium leisure traveler exists, while that might exists for a small portion of seniors. But my guess it would fail. No history exists to suggest this would work
Running wide-bodies on leisure routines requires passenger volume and passengers willing to pay a premium for shorthaul flights. There is a market for 13-14 hour flights but for 2-3 hour flights? Especially routes where you are taking the kiddies?
Yes good be an interesting experiment to determining if a premium leisure traveler exists, while that might exists for a small portion of seniors. But my guess it would fail. No history exists to suggest this would work
Perhaps 772s flying EWR-MCO is overkill. Perhaps E175s properly equipped may be better.
Or maybe UA doesn't care. But there's money to be had.
David
#6
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,761
The case for profitable revenue is unproven. If you believe UA is so incompetent, what about AA and DL? Nothing stopping them to showing their great business acumen, but may be they also don't see a profitable opportunity. Isn't AA Florida's leading carrier?
#7
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: BOS/SIN
Programs: DL PM, OZ Diamond Plus, BA Silver
Posts: 1,798
Not to stray too far OT but AA is flying a daily 772 and another 5x weekly on JFK-MIA...
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 14,993
#9
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: BOS/SIN
Programs: DL PM, OZ Diamond Plus, BA Silver
Posts: 1,798
#10
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,761
And as there is no UA international gateway hub in FL, those AA flights don't really provide support UA is missing a destination premium opportunity (UA missing an opportunity is where this started).
#11
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rockin' the Bakken
Programs: Several
Posts: 978
It’s kinda pertinent to the recent conversation;
recently had someone in front of me try to get into a DEN UC location because they had ‘premier access’. Probably not unique, but it did make me think of the brunt of people flying right now.
While it seemingly may not make sense to fly 772 or other wide body domestically, it’s been done in the past and isn’t too far off of the ULCC business model.
Flying one 772 per day on a leisure route that previously had a mix of UAX/UA flights could make sense as most PAX are likely leisure so time insensitive but price sensitive.
Previous ideas of what traffic is composed of is not relevant now, and likely won’t be for quite a while. I’m not saying I agree, but United has its data and is acting accordingly. They’re not getting the business traffic they used to so they must change accordingly.
That means a far different vision of what UC offers, even though I’d love to see the PHX club open yesterday 😁
recently had someone in front of me try to get into a DEN UC location because they had ‘premier access’. Probably not unique, but it did make me think of the brunt of people flying right now.
While it seemingly may not make sense to fly 772 or other wide body domestically, it’s been done in the past and isn’t too far off of the ULCC business model.
Flying one 772 per day on a leisure route that previously had a mix of UAX/UA flights could make sense as most PAX are likely leisure so time insensitive but price sensitive.
Previous ideas of what traffic is composed of is not relevant now, and likely won’t be for quite a while. I’m not saying I agree, but United has its data and is acting accordingly. They’re not getting the business traffic they used to so they must change accordingly.
That means a far different vision of what UC offers, even though I’d love to see the PHX club open yesterday 😁
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,155
There's a reason for folks flying, especially at this time of year, from the Northeast to Florida. There's a whole bunch of resorts that are busy. UA has flown 752s on these routes. There are folks who'll pay and, yes, others who won't.
Perhaps 772s flying EWR-MCO is overkill. Perhaps E175s properly equipped may be better.
Or maybe UA doesn't care. But there's money to be had.
David
Perhaps 772s flying EWR-MCO is overkill. Perhaps E175s properly equipped may be better.
Or maybe UA doesn't care. But there's money to be had.
David
The future of lounges are premium credit card products like Amex, or premium partner lounges like the Escape Lounge. They will fill the void where needed, and airline lounges will continue in hubs and focus cities....but Florida will no longer be a source of focus cities.
#13
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
You're imagining traffic that will never come back the way it was before the virus. FLL was a leisure AND business market - but no more. Those flights were often packed with cruise ship passengers - now, good luck getting anyone to buy a cruise, I can't even give them away. Even if leisure travel recovers to some degree, business travel as we knew it is finished given the labor market has now dispersed and remote work is normal work. Home builders are now investing in new homes that showcase private home office spaces - if there was any chance of the labor force returning to offices, that wouldn't be happening to the extent that it is.
As for builders selling houses with work from home options, that’s what builders do. Sell houses. That’s the “current thing” so they are running with it. Many businesses are starting to realize the downsides to people working from home, mine included.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,352
Whenever someone tells you this is the "new normal," about anything, be skeptical.
Whenever they're doing it while trying to sell you something, be extremely skeptical.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,309
The discussion was about destination Florida leisure traffic supporting premium products -- far more realistic that an international gateway would support a premium product. And while some of the AA traffic maybe destination MIA, the international traffic likes pays the bill
And as there is no UA international gateway hub in FL, those AA flights don't really provide support UA is missing a destination premium opportunity (UA missing an opportunity is where this started).
And as there is no UA international gateway hub in FL, those AA flights don't really provide support UA is missing a destination premium opportunity (UA missing an opportunity is where this started).
Being a South Florida resident since early 80s, I have witnessed various stages of air travel change.
When UA purchased Pan Am's Latin American operations in Miami back in the early to mid 90s, there were a fleet of widebodies and multiple flights between MIA and UA hub cities.
As an example:
763 between JFK and MIA
741 (later 777) between SFO and MIA
777 between IAD-MIA, LAX-MIA, DEN-MIA, ORD-MIA
There were 727/757 flights between DCA-MIA, LGA/EWR-MIA, ATL-MIA, BOS-MIA
There were multiple flights between IAD, ORD, DEN, LAX and MIA.
RCC@ MIA was the best in the system with open bar and a full buffet (not the current crackers and cheese).
There were all mostly driven by international traffic not domestic leisure traffic between hubs and MIA.