View Poll Results: What do you think of the recent UA changes in Changes fees?
Good idea: No Domestic Change fee w/ no rebooking residual AND No Standby fee/Free SDC all elites




148
64.35%
Good idea: No Domestic Change fee w/ no rebooking residual but NOT No Standby fee/Free SDC all elite




25
10.87%
Good idea: No Standby fee/Free SDC all elite but NOT No Domestic Change fee w/ no rebooking residual




18
7.83%
Neutral /don’t care about either




30
13.04%
Don’t like / think either is a good idea




9
3.91%
Voters: 230. You may not vote on this poll
Change Fees "Gone For Good"(WW ex-USA,non-BE), credit for lower fare!, Intl&BE waiver
|
|||
#46
Moderator: United MileagePlus
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clinging to the edifices of a decadent past. (IAH, DEN, YKF)
Programs: (ಠ_ಠ)
Posts: 8,973
As far as GS simply ignoring add-collects to confirm changes...my guess is the agents will (hopefully) still have wide latitude to do so.
Also remember that for all those extra trying to get in the flight you want, there will be all those extra getting off the flight you want.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,552
...
I’ll also note change feesare were a material source of income for the carrier. Don’t know what will be done to offset this... - and to be fair, maybe UA doesn’t know either - but ALL carriers right now have a massive revenue problem and sooner or later this will have to be addressed. Maybe it’s higher fares, maybe it’s more subsidies, maybe [ → they ← ] will change monetary policy/reset the currency...I really don’t know. But sooner or later the economic reality of operating any airline will have to be balanced. I just hope we can find a path forward that allows the carrier to operate with pay/service levels/benefits/products that work for all...but for now, a win is a win and glad to see UA making the best of a bad situation...
I’ll also note change fees
To me, if the change fees are reasonable (say $30 US), then it is fine. However, when it gets into the $150-$250 range, it is just too much.
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,198
United has a figurative gun to their heads. Zero public goodwill and a new policy of light-load cancellations you might not learn of until check in. They had to do some bold thing to change the narrative.
For year, UA and the other majors have exploited customers dry with high fees, a gutted FF program, and declining service -- because they could. The intent of the last round of mergers was to create an oligopolistic environment where customers had no leverage any more. I always said the fly-our-way-or-get-lost-bub approach would last until some exterior event changed the power calculus and gave the flying public a little leverage; then the airlines would be forced to capitulate at least a little. That day has come, courtesy of COVID-19.
Before you nominate United for a Nobel Prize remember that this is a company that has spent decades playing chess against you. One swallow doth not make a spring.
For year, UA and the other majors have exploited customers dry with high fees, a gutted FF program, and declining service -- because they could. The intent of the last round of mergers was to create an oligopolistic environment where customers had no leverage any more. I always said the fly-our-way-or-get-lost-bub approach would last until some exterior event changed the power calculus and gave the flying public a little leverage; then the airlines would be forced to capitulate at least a little. That day has come, courtesy of COVID-19.
Before you nominate United for a Nobel Prize remember that this is a company that has spent decades playing chess against you. One swallow doth not make a spring.
#49
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,728
Stunned!
Finally a change that I like
and a nice move but still stunned none the less
Finally a change that I like

#50
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 772
If you change to a cheaper fare on Southwest, do you get to keep residual value of the ticket? You don't on United. So this seems like marketing over relatively little changes.
It's a pretty large incentive not to book premium-cabin tickets occasionally, since you won't be able to change to a coach fare without loosing noticeable amounts.
It's a pretty large incentive not to book premium-cabin tickets occasionally, since you won't be able to change to a coach fare without loosing noticeable amounts.
#51
Moderator: United Airlines; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.85MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 59,490
But I have changed flights and paid change fees many times. Net net for me this will be a win and suspect it will be for most.
There is always a corner case but on the whole a positive IMO.
#52
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: LBB
Programs: UA 1K 1MM ★G | Marriott LTT | Hilton ♦ | Hertz PC | Global Entry TSA Pre ✓
Posts: 2,820
This is a huge win for me, as I have spent tens of thousands on changing tickets with United. There were years when I would say that I changed 70% of my bookings.
I wonder if this is just one of many changes that will be coming that benefit frequent flyers and travelers in general. Year after year, we have seen it more difficult to achieve status, more expensive to redeem award miles, more difficult to benefit from FFP's.....
During difficult times, I wonder if the airlines will make their FFP's and other incentives more enticing.....
Waiting to see... but not holding my breath.
I wonder if this is just one of many changes that will be coming that benefit frequent flyers and travelers in general. Year after year, we have seen it more difficult to achieve status, more expensive to redeem award miles, more difficult to benefit from FFP's.....
During difficult times, I wonder if the airlines will make their FFP's and other incentives more enticing.....
Waiting to see... but not holding my breath.

#54
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SAN
Programs: 1K (since 2008), *G (since 1990), 1MM
Posts: 2,803
I applaud United for getting out there to do something to increase demand for their product. At the end of the day these days flying is a commodity. What do you give me for the price you are going to charge me? The airline industry in the USA has had some bad publicity over the last few years so while demand > supply they could weather it. Now supply > demand so there needs to be a change in business practices that is good for the consumer that will increase the top line and not be very harmful to the bottom line for United. After all United is there to make money for the shareholders.
However, the cynic in me says remember how wonderful it was when United introduced Plus Points and modified the 1K program as announed by United Insider? We all did a little jig for joy. And then the other shoe dropped (later in the week). Significant increase in spend - a frequent spend program and not a frequent flight program. A number of us who were adversely impacted by the change (yes I am one of them) said too much and United would lose our business and would regret it in the next economic downturn. Well that economic downturn is here. United has lost my business once I have used my Plus Points.
Hope I am wrong about the other shoe dropping with adverse news for United flyers, but good news on Sunday normally means another announcement later in the week that we may not like as much. As I said hope I am wrong.
However, the cynic in me says remember how wonderful it was when United introduced Plus Points and modified the 1K program as announed by United Insider? We all did a little jig for joy. And then the other shoe dropped (later in the week). Significant increase in spend - a frequent spend program and not a frequent flight program. A number of us who were adversely impacted by the change (yes I am one of them) said too much and United would lose our business and would regret it in the next economic downturn. Well that economic downturn is here. United has lost my business once I have used my Plus Points.
Hope I am wrong about the other shoe dropping with adverse news for United flyers, but good news on Sunday normally means another announcement later in the week that we may not like as much. As I said hope I am wrong.
#55
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NYC/SCF
Programs: IATA, Sabre, AvgeekAgent
Posts: 1,598
This is a huge win for me, as I have spent tens of thousands on changing tickets with United. There were years when I would say that I changed 70% of my bookings.
I wonder if this is just one of many changes that will be coming that benefit frequent flyers and travelers in general. Year after year, we have seen it more difficult to achieve status, more expensive to redeem award miles, more difficult to benefit from FFP's.....
During difficult times, I wonder if the airlines will make their FFP's and other incentives more enticing.....
Waiting to see... but not holding my breath.
I wonder if this is just one of many changes that will be coming that benefit frequent flyers and travelers in general. Year after year, we have seen it more difficult to achieve status, more expensive to redeem award miles, more difficult to benefit from FFP's.....
During difficult times, I wonder if the airlines will make their FFP's and other incentives more enticing.....
Waiting to see... but not holding my breath.

Clearly this is aimed at the population paying for their own tickets (leisure, small business) rather than corporate travel, so I suppose we can expect FFP changes, first class monetization, pricing to target elastic demand. Could the Saturday night stay make a comeback...?
#56
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,222
Good news, glad to see UA taking the initiative here...will be nice to see a “UA does [ x ], when will DL follow” posted by our friends over on the DL forum.
...and there it is! https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delt...ta-follow.html
Well said. Also would note Alaska, the donut-hole-airline [read: too big to be small and too small to be big] effectively offered this for their mid tier and above elites.
Said something similar back in February prior to the full on awareness of what we were in for with COVID. Basically it boils down to a macro demand problem that the carriers have no tools to address.
edited to add - COVID19 / Best Assessment as to "Secondary" Impacts on UA/M+ in 2020 from Black Swans
Yeah...but on the whole how will the average customer benefit more: getting a residual voucher back or paying $200 for a change fee.
Let me say it another way: looking back to 2019 - the last “normal” year - what amount do you think was higher: 1. Change fees, or 2. Residual values. I’m not saying there’s no nuance here, but for the average customer this will produce an positive outcome the majority (note: not ALL) the time.
I’ll also note change feesare were a material source of income for the carrier. Don’t know what will be done to offset this - and to be fair, maybe UA doesn’t know either - but ALL carriers right now have a massive revenue problem and sooner or later this will have to be addressed. Maybe it’s higher fares, maybe it’s more subsidies, maybe [ → they ← ] will change monetary policy/reset the currency...I really don’t know. But sooner or later the economic reality of operating any airline will have to be balanced. I just hope we can find a path forward that allows the carrier to operate with pay/service levels/benefits/products that work for all...but for now, a win is a win and glad to see UA making the best of a bad situation.
One would assume standby lists would retain a status component.
...and there it is! https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delt...ta-follow.html
Well said. Also would note Alaska, the donut-hole-airline [read: too big to be small and too small to be big] effectively offered this for their mid tier and above elites.
Said something similar back in February prior to the full on awareness of what we were in for with COVID. Basically it boils down to a macro demand problem that the carriers have no tools to address.
edited to add - COVID19 / Best Assessment as to "Secondary" Impacts on UA/M+ in 2020 from Black Swans
Yeah...but on the whole how will the average customer benefit more: getting a residual voucher back or paying $200 for a change fee.
Let me say it another way: looking back to 2019 - the last “normal” year - what amount do you think was higher: 1. Change fees, or 2. Residual values. I’m not saying there’s no nuance here, but for the average customer this will produce an positive outcome the majority (note: not ALL) the time.
I’ll also note change fees
One would assume standby lists would retain a status component.
No residual is a BIG difference from Southwest -- less stress over fares potentially dropping, I feel a lot less pressure with WN to wait wait wait to see if fares drop, just book it now (thus WN capturing my money) and if they drop I know I can use the credit for the next trip. And in reality, I may forget to keep checking so miss the fare drop -- and then sometimes not use the credit in the end; win for WN and I at least felt that I wasn't locked in to the higher fare!
#57
Join Date: Jan 2018
Programs: UA LT GS | UA LT Club | Marriott LT Titanium
Posts: 1,002
My takeaways:
1. Smart, aggressive, proactive move by UA.
2. Sets the tone that Kirby's reign will be customer friendly
3. In my case, 80% of my Southwest spend will shift to UA
4. On the earnings call UA discussed rebuilding the balance sheet (aka increase cash & reduce debt) post-Covid. This will help as advanced bookings should materially grow.
5. Remember, at any given time, UA normally sits on $12B of customer cash related to future travel. If that grows to $15B, the incremental $3B almost pays back the govt debt!
6. Dilutes MP a bit as the SDC and no mileage redeposit fees are things I valued. Now everyone has them.
7. Watch Kirby's video associated with the release. He makes it clear a flury of additional changes are coming soon. He mentions it at a point In the video where it likely references the route network, although he may be referencing the loyalty program to address #6.
8. AA is not happy. When they match, they will lose material fee income, at a time when they desperately need cash.
To date, Kirby's management team has made smart operating moves. Raising cash aggressively, launching point-to-point domestic routes, and brilliantly monetizing MP was impressive.
However, with this latest change, it's clear this team is smart, aggressive and boldly looking to redefine how legacy carriers operate in this country.
There's a new thought leader in the industry and I don't think the legacy carriers or LCCs are too happy... Nice work UA.
1. Smart, aggressive, proactive move by UA.
2. Sets the tone that Kirby's reign will be customer friendly
3. In my case, 80% of my Southwest spend will shift to UA
4. On the earnings call UA discussed rebuilding the balance sheet (aka increase cash & reduce debt) post-Covid. This will help as advanced bookings should materially grow.
5. Remember, at any given time, UA normally sits on $12B of customer cash related to future travel. If that grows to $15B, the incremental $3B almost pays back the govt debt!
6. Dilutes MP a bit as the SDC and no mileage redeposit fees are things I valued. Now everyone has them.
7. Watch Kirby's video associated with the release. He makes it clear a flury of additional changes are coming soon. He mentions it at a point In the video where it likely references the route network, although he may be referencing the loyalty program to address #6.
8. AA is not happy. When they match, they will lose material fee income, at a time when they desperately need cash.
To date, Kirby's management team has made smart operating moves. Raising cash aggressively, launching point-to-point domestic routes, and brilliantly monetizing MP was impressive.
However, with this latest change, it's clear this team is smart, aggressive and boldly looking to redefine how legacy carriers operate in this country.
There's a new thought leader in the industry and I don't think the legacy carriers or LCCs are too happy... Nice work UA.
Last edited by spartacusmcfly; Aug 30, 20 at 4:51 pm
#58
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bellingham/Gainesville
Programs: UA-G MM, Priority Club Platinum, Avis First, Hertz 5*, Red Lion
Posts: 2,197
The 20% in your boat will likely endup making up 80% of the revenue loss through higher fares (either straight out, or through restrictions on booking classes for upgrades, less discounted inventory at popular business travel times of year/week/day etc). This will please customers that suffer a few changes per year where the change fee represents 30-40% of the ticket value. Carriers will look to the other group to make up the difference.
Clearly this is aimed at the population paying for their own tickets (leisure, small business) rather than corporate travel, so I suppose we can expect FFP changes, first class monetization, pricing to target elastic demand. Could the Saturday night stay make a comeback...?
Clearly this is aimed at the population paying for their own tickets (leisure, small business) rather than corporate travel, so I suppose we can expect FFP changes, first class monetization, pricing to target elastic demand. Could the Saturday night stay make a comeback...?
#59
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: NYC
Programs: UA Platinum
Posts: 63
To avoid the issue with losing residual value couldn’t one cancel the ticket instead of changing it? That would presumably result in a future flight credit that could be used the next time you want to book an equal or more expensive fare. Then to accomplish the change you just book a new ticket.
#60
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston (IAH,HOU) / Kāʻanapali (JHM,OGG)
Programs: UA GS 2MM, AA P 2MM, DL PM, US P, VS G, SPG LT P, HH D, HYATT P, PC P, AVIS PC, HERTZ PLAT
Posts: 970
This change makes a lot of sense. Not having to consider change fees reduces the risk that someone is making a financial decision to fly still when they are sick. Not only will this will make me feel safer to fly UA, I expect statistics will back it up in the long term.
