Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA cargo-only flights during COVID-19 era

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old May 12, 2020, 2:04 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
https://www.unitedcargo.com/
Widebody Schedule May 5-11-20
cargo-only flights are listed

12 May 2020
Originally Posted by EWR764
UA cargo-only service for May listed by hub with return flights mostly deleted (cargo-only sections in 27XX/28XX flight number range):

EWR-BOM 2830 77W 3x
EWR-FRA 2798 77W/787 3x
EWR-SFO 2730 77W 1x

GUM-LAX 2797 77W/787 Daily (operating PVG-LAX-GUM)
GUM-PVG 2778 77W Daily
GUM-SFO 2849 77W 3x (operating TPE-GUM-SFO)
GUM-TPE 2847 77W 3x

HKG-SIN 2861 77W/787 3x

IAD-BRU 2792 787 3x
IAD-DUB 2816 787 3x
IAD-NRT 2863 787 Daily
IAD-SJU 2810 77W 1x

IAH-AMS 2786 77W 2x
IAH-FRA 2788 77W 3x
IAH-SCL 2790 787 2x

LAX-FRA 2796 77W 3x
LAX-GUM 2765 77W Daily (operating LAX-GUM-PVG)
LAX-HKG 2852 77W Daily
LAX-HKG 2774 77W Daily
LAX-LHR 2800 787 2x
LAX-SYD 2812 787 4x

NRT-CTU 2801 787 Daily
NRT-PEK 2845 787 Daily
NRT-PEK 2822 787 Daily
NRT-PEK 2836 787 4x
NRT-PVG 2808 787 Daily
NRT-PVG 2850 787 Daily

ORD-AMS 2810 787 2x
ORD-BRU 2841 787 Daily
ORD-FRA 2776 77W 3x
ORD-HKG 2865 77W Daily
ORD-LHR 2806 787 2x
ORD-NRT 2820 787 Daily
ORD-NRT 2821 787 Daily
ORD-SFO 2853 77W 1x
ORD-ZRH 2782 787 3x

SFO-AMS 2768 77W 3x
SFO-FRA 2780 77W 2x
SFO-GUM 2846 77W 3x
SFO-HKG 2861 77W/787 3x
SFO-ICN 2832 787 3x
SFO-MEL 2854 1x
SFO-NRT 2826 787 Daily
SFO-NRT 2834 787 Daily
SFO-NRT 2835 787 4x
SFO-SYD 2812 787 3x

All 777 flights are 77W, 787s are EQV, all series, but mostly 789.

Print Wikipost

UA cargo-only flights during COVID-19 era

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2020, 1:19 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Programs: National Executive Elite, Marriott Bonfire Titanium, Hilton Gold, United Premier Silver, Hertz PC
Posts: 199
Originally Posted by acregal
But not exit row - I don't think the cargo can verbally respond to the crew that they understand the obligations that come with sitting in the exit row.
No need to respond if there's no cabin crew *taps head* =)
mapelle621 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2020, 6:14 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 3,235
Five-fold increase in cargo rates with all those low cost passenger fares available? And I've got a three-bag 70lb allowance?

Hey, companies that ship cargo on UA! Want to buy me a ticket to transport 210 lbs of your cargo?
tarheelnj is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2020, 6:27 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DSM, BKK or anywhere with an airport
Programs: UA 2P, HH Gold
Posts: 1,018
Tons of information on UA’s cargo plans over at www.unitedcargo.com. This is a great site, I use it regularly to get changes in the flight schedule for UA. Lots of neat stuff on that site if you’re an av-geek.

Cheers
n198ua
n198ua is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2020, 7:50 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: EWR-SEA-IAD
Programs: UA 1P MM, AS MVP G*, SPG Gold, Hyatt Plat, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 977
You are going to see a lot of freight extra sections on UA, mostly by USPS or freight forwarders. Its mainly 777s or 787s.

For example the 773 has 44 positions of cargo. Thats 44 AKE containers or 14 PMC pallets if I'm doing my math right... over 100,000 lbs of cargo with no passenger baggage to worry about.
HGHUA is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2020, 3:00 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Programs: Hertz PC
Posts: 657
Originally Posted by HGHUA
You are going to see a lot of freight extra sections on UA, mostly by USPS or freight forwarders. Its mainly 777s or 787s.

For example the 773 has 44 positions of cargo. Thats 44 AKE containers or 14 PMC pallets if I'm doing my math right... over 100,000 lbs of cargo with no passenger baggage to worry about.
According to their published rates if they could get max weight of 100,000 lbs. That would be about $150,000 for a ewr-SFO trip.

Would that cover operational cost?
bhunt is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2020, 10:52 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: UA MP
Posts: 1,659
Originally Posted by bhunt
According to their published rates if they could get max weight of 100,000 lbs. That would be about $150,000 for a ewr-SFO trip.

Would that cover operational cost?
I would be very, very surprised if it didn't cover operational costs - fuel would be the biggest thing, followed by crew.

However, I imagine domestic shippers are making adjustments to account for the possibility of not being able to send as air freight (or it being otherwise prohibitively expensive).

When shipping overseas, that luxury doesn't exist.
acregal is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2020, 8:35 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: EWR-SEA-IAD
Programs: UA 1P MM, AS MVP G*, SPG Gold, Hyatt Plat, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 977
Originally Posted by bhunt
According to their published rates if they could get max weight of 100,000 lbs. That would be about $150,000 for a ewr-SFO trip.

Would that cover operational cost?
Gotta remember that the rates for cargo are high right now and that specialty products fetch many times the normal general cargo rates.
HGHUA is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2020, 6:08 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,965
There was an article in the Taiwanese newspaper on EVA and China Airlines doing cargo flights with their passenger 777-300ERs.

I posted here: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32229117-post205.html

The math and description were kind of fuzzy in the report. It said that for SHA-TPE, the cargo rate has gone from NT$18/kg to NT$60/kg as factories in China restart and try to play catchup.

It said that CI and BR are basically letting freight forwarders charter their planes and the money they get is like having 90% passenger load factor.

CI has 18 - 1 leased out 747Fs and BR has 5 freighters. BR used to have a few 747-400 Combis but not anymore. I guess they are already more plugged into the cargo business than UA so it is easier for them to get more business.
username is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2020, 4:28 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
5 fold increase is just like getting news from Facebook memes. Looks like 20-30% in most trans-oceanic markets. https://www.aircargonews.net/airline...h-goes-global/


I just had to google it ‘cause a 500% increase would not have carriers parking their wide body aircraft, they’d be running em into the ground with fuel prices low and crew costs already covered
findark likes this.
fastair is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2020, 11:33 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
Originally Posted by TomMM
Strap the cargo into seats.
I thought the point to self-loading cargo was that we had to do this ourselves?

I can't picture an easily-configurable & reconfigurable transition from passenger to cargo when it involves removing passenger sections. In some cases it may not be necessary anyway; I'd think some cargo is of sufficient density that a cargo hold might come close to max capacity on its own. Maybe.
Mike Jacoubowsky is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2020, 2:29 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/NYC/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,752
Originally Posted by Mike Jacoubowsky
I thought the point to self-loading cargo was that we had to do this ourselves?

I can't picture an easily-configurable & reconfigurable transition from passenger to cargo when it involves removing passenger sections. In some cases it may not be necessary anyway; I'd think some cargo is of sufficient density that a cargo hold might come close to max capacity on its own. Maybe.
passenger airlines are using the main deck for cargo without removing seats. innovative stuff: https://www.aircargonews.net/airline...o-meet-demand/
riphamilton is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2020, 3:15 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, UA Mileage Plus 1K, AA Executive Plat, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,344
Originally Posted by riphamilton
passenger airlines are using the main deck for cargo without removing seats. innovative stuff: https://www.aircargonews.net/airline...o-meet-demand/
been done long before todays climate. Continental used to operate "baggage" flights to Latin America stations during Christmas. you would place checked luggage in each seat, overhead bins, etc.
CALMSP is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2020, 3:29 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
Originally Posted by riphamilton
passenger airlines are using the main deck for cargo without removing seats. innovative stuff: https://www.aircargonews.net/airline...o-meet-demand/
That's impressive. At first I thought hey, better potential utilization of space for cargo if they give us a few more inches of legroom! Then the ugly truth hit. They'll give us the choice of paying for legroom by the inch, with the remainder taken up by cargo that has a thin profile.
Mike Jacoubowsky is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2020, 6:50 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LAX
Programs: DL, UA
Posts: 421
UA Flying LAX-HKG today and tomorrow

I assume it's cargo, but anyone know why UA is flying the 77W from LAX-HKG today and tomorrow? See it loaded in the schedule on flight aware + one flight en route. Nothing on UA.com
nw6338 is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2020, 6:55 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 5,447
It's been happening for the better part of a week now, with 27XX or 28XX flight numbers.
dkc192 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.