anyone seen passengers on UA's TPAC flights wearing respirator yet? is it allowed?
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,592
Yeah but how big is the droplet of bodily fluid that the virus is in? This: https://lms.learning.hhs.gov/content...5_FAQ_2011.pdf suggests that blocking out 500 nanometer is sufficient.
I'd be more worried about the 5% leakage. Although I'm not sure what the leakage is on larger particles.
I'd be more worried about the 5% leakage. Although I'm not sure what the leakage is on larger particles.
Most viruses don't last long outside the body, and it depends on conditions. Coronaviruses look pretty durable- as long as days on some surfaces, and on PPE, though some metals (copper, copper alloys like brass) seem to have antiviral properties. That there aren't planeloads of people running around with it suggest that it doesn't transmit that well through air.
FWIW, I'm flying transcon out of LAX tomorrow and not terribly worried about it. I keep a box of N95 masks at home for days when there are a lot of particulates in the air from fires, and they'll be staying in the box.
#32
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 336
I forgot to ask her, but I was wondering if the TSA asked people to remove their respirators at the checkpoints... (if so, doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of respirators?)
I was unable to buy N95 respirators from anywhere(local or online). While I was getting my regular check-up, my primary doctor was kind enough to give me a couple dozen surgical masks.(better than nothing, right?) That's the least she can do, since she doesn't accept insurance at all and each visit was $150.
#33
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
My sister-in-law was connecting at LAX just this morning. She said that a dozens of people at TBIT were wearing respirators. An elderly man was even wearing a gas mask. Strangely, none of the people that she saw wearing respirators were East Asians.(as in Chinese, Korean, Japanese)
I forgot to ask her, but I was wondering if the TSA asked people to remove their respirators at the checkpoints... (if so, doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of respirators?)
I was unable to buy N95 respirators from anywhere(local or online). While I was getting my regular check-up, my primary doctor was kind enough to give me a couple dozen surgical masks.(better than nothing, right?) That's the least she can do, since she doesn't accept insurance at all and each visit was $150.
I forgot to ask her, but I was wondering if the TSA asked people to remove their respirators at the checkpoints... (if so, doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of respirators?)
I was unable to buy N95 respirators from anywhere(local or online). While I was getting my regular check-up, my primary doctor was kind enough to give me a couple dozen surgical masks.(better than nothing, right?) That's the least she can do, since she doesn't accept insurance at all and each visit was $150.
#35
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,772
#37
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,592
That said, probably the most effective thing you can do is wash your hands regularly and don't touch your eyes, nose, and mouth. Basically good BSL 1 lab practice.
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
Fair enough. Supply and demand. I paid $8 for a 2-pack before I went to Delhi (from a pharmacy) so I'm ok with $4 per.
The ones I bought are these:
but they are now $60. Glad I bought them yesterday.
The ones I bought are these:
but they are now $60. Glad I bought them yesterday.
#40
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
Fair enough. Supply and demand. I paid $8 for a 2-pack before I went to Delhi (from a pharmacy) so I'm ok with $4 per.
The ones I bought are these:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MPLVVA
but they are now $60. Glad I bought them yesterday.
The ones I bought are these:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MPLVVA
but they are now $60. Glad I bought them yesterday.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,592
The ones I bought are these:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MPLVVA
but they are now $60. Glad I bought them yesterday.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MPLVVA
but they are now $60. Glad I bought them yesterday.
#43
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 4,992
As someone who travelled frequently overseas during SARS, I am not someone who is prone to overreacting on flu type outbreaks, but the fact the WHO was at 50/50 on the issue yesterday and there is a lot of politics at play in that organization this is more serious than the Chinese initially let on.
1919 was the last serious worldwide influenza epidemic and we did not have the fast global connections we have now. We are overdue for a killer influenza and I for one will be wearing a respirator when I travel. Of course basic hygiene principles as well.
I am amazed UA has not yet mandated them for their customer facing personnel.
1919 was the last serious worldwide influenza epidemic and we did not have the fast global connections we have now. We are overdue for a killer influenza and I for one will be wearing a respirator when I travel. Of course basic hygiene principles as well.
I am amazed UA has not yet mandated them for their customer facing personnel.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,209
This is wise since we don't know exactly how much virus is necessary to overwhelm the immune system. It is very likely that any reduction in viral exposure will have some benefit in one's ability to fight off a full blown infection. Survival rate, based on the current, admittedly tainted, Chinese information is around 80%, so there are many unknown variables that can help one overcome the infection, and reduction of total viral particle exposure is likely one of those factors.
#45
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 4,992
Below is something interesting from Foreign Policy magazine:
"Yet few children have yet been reported with coronavirus symptoms. That does not mean that no children have been infected. A similar pattern of benign disease in children, with increasing severity and mortality with age, was seen in SARS and MERS. SARS had a mortality rate averaging 10 percent. Yet no children, and just 1 percent of youths under 24, died, while those older than 50 had a 65 percent risk of dying. Is being an adult a risk factor per se? If so, what is it about childhood that confers protection? It may be the nonspecific effects of live vaccines such as for measles and rubella, which already have been found to provide protection from diseases beyond their immediate target. That may also explain why more men than women have been infected by the coronavirus, because women routinely are given a rubella vaccine booster in their teens to guard against the dangers of having rubella while pregnant. While we wait for an accelerated coronavirus vaccine to be ready, could innate immunity in adults be boosted by giving measles vaccines?"
Frequent travelers to China might consider getting a measles booster before they travel.