United Plane Diverts/ Lands Overweight to Help Crew Member in Distress.
#16
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,116
Wow.
i just can’t with some people.
this was a medical emergency. They made a heavy/long landing. They are doing typical safety checks before going. The only persons life in danger was the person having a medical emergency.
what if it was the OP?
i just can’t with some people.
this was a medical emergency. They made a heavy/long landing. They are doing typical safety checks before going. The only persons life in danger was the person having a medical emergency.
what if it was the OP?
#17
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IAD
Programs: UA 1K 2MM, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 565
I get asked all the time why I don't turn my private flying into a career and become an airline pilot. This thread is one example of why.
#18
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 4,993
Good on the Captain.
It's nice to see that there are professionals out there that are consistently making the correct decisions, without regard to the possible negative publicity or political consequences of their actions.
A Captain who, based on the best information that he had at the time, makes a decision, without regard for the cost to the airline, to preserve life should be applauded here, not criticized.
What a whiny, entitled bunch we Americans have become.
A Captain who, based on the best information that he had at the time, makes a decision, without regard for the cost to the airline, to preserve life should be applauded here, not criticized.
What a whiny, entitled bunch we Americans have become.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,323
^ to the Captain!
#21
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: BNA (Nashville)
Programs: HH Diamond
Posts: 6,225
I understand its a hobby at FT to second guess every decision by the FA when it comes to overhead bin decisions, or whether I really can't have a Bloody Mary PDB when the FAA inspector is here, or whether I really have to (insert FA instruction here). And then its fun to read a bunch of posts arguing the merits of that decision.
But, this 'second guessing' seems pretty heartless. The melodramatic title, the extraneous information (ELDERLY crew member), the implication that the poster was inconvenienced, etc. puts this post in a league of its own.
But, this 'second guessing' seems pretty heartless. The melodramatic title, the extraneous information (ELDERLY crew member), the implication that the poster was inconvenienced, etc. puts this post in a league of its own.
#22
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In between
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, SPG/Marriott Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 564
1) Hope the crew member in question is OK
2) This has to be a nominee for worst post of the year - misleading title, unparalleled level of self-importance, general lack of humanity from the OP
2) This has to be a nominee for worst post of the year - misleading title, unparalleled level of self-importance, general lack of humanity from the OP
#23
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: Does Non Rev count?
Posts: 588
As a captain for United, I would have done the same thing in a heart-beat, for any passenger or crew member, including yourself.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,713
Of course not. The correct phrase would be a hard landing.
#25
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,116
This belongs in the DYKWIA thread
OP Rather let someone risk medical emergency/death then be inconvenienced
OP Rather let someone risk medical emergency/death then be inconvenienced
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 29,997
There's no way this post is real.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
What alternative is OP advocating? Fly on as scheduled while person in distress dies of a heart attack?
Perhaps then we'd hear complaints about the curtailed final drink service owing to one of the staff being recently dead.
Perhaps then we'd hear complaints about the curtailed final drink service owing to one of the staff being recently dead.
#28
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Mods. notified.
The post is wrong, callous, clickbait and really deserves an invitation from UA to the passenger to find another carrier which is more to his liking.
The post is wrong, callous, clickbait and really deserves an invitation from UA to the passenger to find another carrier which is more to his liking.
#29
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PHL
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Raddison Platinum, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 5,268
I think there is confusion about the difference between:
a "crash landing"/landing which endangers the life of everyone on board
and
an overweight landing which his the risk of damaging the aircraft but is of relatively low risk of injuries/death.
In the first case, I might agree that the captain should have taken additional measures (ie. burn/dump fuel) before landing. However, from your own description, he only mentions damage to the aircraft which typically is very low risk to the lives on board. If someone is having an MI, he/she may only have an hour or so to get to a cath lab before there is permanent damage or potential death. The most they can do onboard is probably give asprin. In that case, the decision between saving a life and damaging an aircraft is an easy one.
a "crash landing"/landing which endangers the life of everyone on board
and
an overweight landing which his the risk of damaging the aircraft but is of relatively low risk of injuries/death.
In the first case, I might agree that the captain should have taken additional measures (ie. burn/dump fuel) before landing. However, from your own description, he only mentions damage to the aircraft which typically is very low risk to the lives on board. If someone is having an MI, he/she may only have an hour or so to get to a cath lab before there is permanent damage or potential death. The most they can do onboard is probably give asprin. In that case, the decision between saving a life and damaging an aircraft is an easy one.
#30
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: YEG
Programs: Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Diamond, KLM Silver
Posts: 166
I believe you’ve mistaken the aviation meaning of a “crash landing”
If you landed at an airport by choice of the pilot it was not a crash landing. A crash landing would be if you landed in a field due to the pilots inability to control the aircraft (loss of engine etc).
crash landing - an emergency landing under circumstances where a normal landing is impossible (usually damaging the aircraft)
emergency landing, forced landing - an unscheduled airplane landing that is made under circumstances (engine failure or adverse weather) not under the pilot's control