Disappointing Experience with PP Misconnect
#46
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Leaving aside EWR-HNL, the longest UA domestic flight is a smidge over six hours. Would anyone seriously bite off their nose to spite their face by waiting 'days' for a PP seat to get to where the want to go? I've taken a PP flight, it's ok but certainly not airplane nirvana for which I'd overnight in an airport hotel at EWR/LAX/SFO.
-James
#47
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
The other thing we don't know is how long the connection was at EWR.
Certainly one should be cautious about booking PE on a connecting itinerary (especially one involving EWR or SFO) without a nice cushion.
Certainly one should be cautious about booking PE on a connecting itinerary (especially one involving EWR or SFO) without a nice cushion.
#48
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,568
Your assumption is because they selected a seat months ago and you paid for that seat. You misconnected (whether your fault for booking a short connection, the airline MX issue, weather, forest fires, whatever the reason) so the conclusion because you bought a seat in PP on flight #1 and you didn't make that flight, you want UA to bump down a passenger on flight #2 because they legally selected a seat but didn't paid the premium you paid for that seat to accommodate your seat pricing?..
#49
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,118
I'm still confused after reading the thread. What was the fare class of the OP's ticket? I know he/she said "PP" but there's more to it than that. I ask because it's not certain that it wasn't a Y ticket, paid for upgrade to E+, and then getting a PE seat selected before the moratorium on doing that.
#50
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SFO
Programs: OZ Diamond/*G, IHG Diamond Amb, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,239
I'm still confused after reading the thread. What was the fare class of the OP's ticket? I know he/she said "PP" but there's more to it than that. I ask because it's not certain that it wasn't a Y ticket, paid for upgrade to E+, and then getting a PE seat selected before the moratorium on doing that.
#51
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: SFO
Programs: United MileagePlus Premier 1k, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite, National Exec Elite
Posts: 81
Nothing new, my wife was booked in Polaris for both legs of GRU-EWR-SFO. GRU-EWR was delayed therefore she missed her connecting flight, had a choice between the next available flight with lie flats or an earlier flight in E- as E+ wasn’t available (the seat map isn’t an accurate depiction of availability). She chose the latter and got credited 400 bucks on her credit card a week later.
United sees no difference between PP pax with upgraded fares or booked fares unless there was an op-up upgrade. Same for Polaris whether it was booked or upgraded via GPU or miles.
United sees no difference between PP pax with upgraded fares or booked fares unless there was an op-up upgrade. Same for Polaris whether it was booked or upgraded via GPU or miles.
#52
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SFO
Programs: OZ Diamond/*G, IHG Diamond Amb, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,239
Well, the saga continues. So, after the rebooking to E-, I noticed that the fare class on my mobile BP showed as L, so I asked them to change it to H so that I would earn the same amount of miles I would have if I had flown my PP seat, which they agreed to do and reflected on the mobile BP, however, I checked my Asiana Club account today and it posted as an L fare at 50% earning. I know their system audits fare class changes during IRROPS re-booking because once I misconnected to a flight purchased in G and was rebooked in E but the miles posted as G, but I can't quite wrap my head around what the audit does that would turn my fare into L class....if it's by originally purchased fare shouldn't it have changed it to A....does it just take the lowest fare class ever associated with the flight?!
What I'm honestly most upset about is how I was basically treated like any other Y passenger even though I had outright bought PP, from not getting an E+ seat, to miles posting at 50%, it doesn't seem like there was any differentiation between how I was treated and how I would have been treated if I just bought Y.
What I'm honestly most upset about is how I was basically treated like any other Y passenger even though I had outright bought PP, from not getting an E+ seat, to miles posting at 50%, it doesn't seem like there was any differentiation between how I was treated and how I would have been treated if I just bought Y.
#53
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
What I'm honestly most upset about is how I was basically treated like any other Y passenger even though I had outright bought PP, from not getting an E+ seat, to miles posting at 50%, it doesn't seem like there was any differentiation between how I was treated and how I would have been treated if I just bought Y.
#54
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EWR / PHL
Programs: UA 1P MM, HH G, Marriott G
Posts: 802
LHR would have cost UA a couple of hundred in taxes and fees that would have been payable but not charged as part of the ticket.
Also the OP would have needed a valid passport on him from a country allowed to enter or TWOV to the UK.
Also the OP would have needed a valid passport on him from a country allowed to enter or TWOV to the UK.
#55
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC/Northern NJ
Programs: 1K - UAL, Platinum DL, Marriott, Hilton, SPG
Posts: 1,815
What I'm honestly most upset about is how I was basically treated like any other Y passenger even though I had outright bought PP, from not getting an E+ seat, to miles posting at 50%, it doesn't seem like there was any differentiation between how I was treated and how I would have been treated if I just bought Y.
#56
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
I'm sure the whole LHR discussion is a side-track, probably said to see if UA would take the bait. No one would seriously want to do that.
Last edited by LondonElite; Nov 2, 2019 at 11:50 am
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,496
If this had happened to me, I would have caught the next flight in E+ (UA has basically hourly flight between EWR and SFO) and deal with the impact post-flight. Waiting around for the next domestic PP flight is not ideal when UA flies 1x daily to SFO and 2x to LAX (could be wrong on the frequency).
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,460
Well, the saga continues. So, after the rebooking to E-, I noticed that the fare class on my mobile BP showed as L, so I asked them to change it to H so that I would earn the same amount of miles I would have if I had flown my PP seat, which they agreed to do and reflected on the mobile BP, however, I checked my Asiana Club account today and it posted as an L fare at 50% earning. I know their system audits fare class changes during IRROPS re-booking because once I misconnected to a flight purchased in G and was rebooked in E but the miles posted as G, but I can't quite wrap my head around what the audit does that would turn my fare into L class....if it's by originally purchased fare shouldn't it have changed it to A....does it just take the lowest fare class ever associated with the flight?!
What I'm honestly most upset about is how I was basically treated like any other Y passenger even though I had outright bought PP, from not getting an E+ seat, to miles posting at 50%, it doesn't seem like there was any differentiation between how I was treated and how I would have been treated if I just bought Y.
What I'm honestly most upset about is how I was basically treated like any other Y passenger even though I had outright bought PP, from not getting an E+ seat, to miles posting at 50%, it doesn't seem like there was any differentiation between how I was treated and how I would have been treated if I just bought Y.
I would think you're eligible for at least a refund of fare difference or travel voucher compensation, assuming you can reduce your complaint to two or three sentences.
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
So, after the rebooking to E-, I noticed that the fare class on my mobile BP showed as L, so I asked them to change it to H so that I would earn the same amount of miles I would have if I had flown my PP seat, which they agreed to do and reflected on the mobile BP, however, I checked my Asiana Club account today and it posted as an L fare at 50% earning.
What I'm honestly most upset about is how I was basically treated like any other Y passenger even though I had outright bought PP, from not getting an E+ seat, to miles posting at 50%, it doesn't seem like there was any differentiation between how I was treated and how I would have been treated if I just bought Y.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Nov 2, 2019 at 9:00 pm Reason: discuss the issue; not the poster(s)
#60
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452