I have only flown Y in the 3-4-3 configuration on shorter flights, LAX-DEN and DEN-IAH (both "island" configuration 777-200s with the old business class cabins reused as first class seating). It's the shoulder space that really suffers. Once I had a middle empty next to me, the second time the adjacent passenger was very petite. I would dread facing something like SFO-HKG (on the 777-300, also 3-4-3) in this configuration.
|
Originally Posted by Kurt
(Post 31518062)
I have only flown Y in the 3-4-3 configuration on shorter flights, LAX-DEN and DEN-IAH (both "island" configuration 777-200s with the old business class cabins reused as first class seating). It's the shoulder space that really suffers. Once I had a middle empty next to me, the second time the adjacent passenger was very petite. I would dread facing something like SFO-HKG (on the 777-300, also 3-4-3) in this configuration.
my family are all pretty slim an the toddler will be sitting between my wife and me so it's not so much the width that is concerning. it's more the the firmness of the seat bottom cushion. i need firm cushions because of my back. i have suffered several times due to the domestic seats on carriers such as old south west or american having seats that sunk in at the bottom as soon as you sit in them. |
I recently did a return trip, outbound in the new 3-4-3 and return in the old 3-3-3. Both seats seemed equally hard, at least as compared with the old 2-5-2. As I had the middle seat empty between Mrs LHRSFO and me on the new sardine can, it was better but only for that reason.
|
Originally Posted by Tewkewl
(Post 31518165)
my family are all pretty slim an the toddler will be sitting between my wife and me so it's not so much the width that is concerning. it's more the the firmness of the seat bottom cushion. i need firm cushions because of my back. i have suffered several times due to the domestic seats on carriers such as old south west or american having seats that sunk in at the bottom as soon as you sit in them.
|
Originally Posted by lhrsfo
(Post 31518260)
I recently did a return trip, outbound in the new 3-4-3 and return in the old 3-3-3. Both seats seemed equally hard, at least as compared with the old 2-5-2. As I had the middle seat empty between Mrs LHRSFO and me on the new sardine can, it was better but only for that reason.
Thanks. that helps! |
Originally Posted by coolbeans202
(Post 31517671)
I know it's only an inch, but for whatever reason my shoulders are proportioned such that that single inch is the difference between a pain free flight and severe discomfort. I won't fly in 3-4-3.
|
Originally Posted by Tewkewl
(Post 31518165)
my family are all pretty slim an the toddler will be sitting between my wife and me so it's not so much the width that is concerning. it's more the the firmness of the seat bottom cushion. i need firm cushions because of my back. i have suffered several times due to the domestic seats on carriers such as old south west or american having seats that sunk in at the bottom as soon as you sit in them.
When not inflated, they take up very little space |
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 31519414)
Instead of being at the mercy of the seat, try
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07253GPZS...pa_dk_detail_2 https://www.amazon.com/Therm-a-Rest-...9FY/ref=sr_1_5 When not inflated, they take up very little space |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.