Difference between TK and LH mileage accrual on UA
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Programs: UA 1k, AA Plt, MR Lifetime Plat & Amb
Posts: 1,829
Difference between TK and LH mileage accrual on UA
The included image show 2 partner flights: TK and LH. Both flights were in J class but it’s a bit shocking that the TK flight yielded so few comparative miles considering it’s the longer flight. TK is a full member of *A so I was a bit surprised. Does anyone know why the disparity?
just in case the image is not showing up:
TK: FRA-ESB, PQMs 1368, PQS 1. (Actual miles 1368)
LH: FRA-ATH, PQMs 3372, PQS 1.5. (Actual miles 1124)
just in case the image is not showing up:
TK: FRA-ESB, PQMs 1368, PQS 1. (Actual miles 1368)
LH: FRA-ATH, PQMs 3372, PQS 1.5. (Actual miles 1124)
Last edited by Dudemon; Aug 24, 2019 at 5:18 am Reason: Adding image.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Programs: UA 1K, AC MM E75, Marriott LT Ti, IHG Dia Amb, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 15,521
LH, LX, AC and NH are preferred partners. You’ll earn more PQMs and RDMs than the other Star Alliance airlines. You just have to look at the mileage accumulation pages for the respective airlines on UA website.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,038
The included image show 2 partner flights: TK and LH. Both flights were in J class but it’s a bit shocking that the TK flight yielded so few comparative miles considering it’s the longer flight. TK is a full member of *A so I was a bit surprised. Does anyone know why the disparity?
just in case the image is not showing up:
TK: FRA-ESB, PQMs 1368, PQS 1. (Actual miles 1368)
LH: FRA-ATH, PQMs 3372, PQS 1.5. (Actual miles 1124)
just in case the image is not showing up:
TK: FRA-ESB, PQMs 1368, PQS 1. (Actual miles 1368)
LH: FRA-ATH, PQMs 3372, PQS 1.5. (Actual miles 1124)
#4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,156
"J" class on TK is if their lowest level business class, which does indeed earn 1.0x miles flown. All other business class fares earn 1.25x (C, D, Z and K), so on this one you were indeed on a J class fare.
"J" class on LH is full-fare business class, and earns 2.0x miles flown. As you only earned 1.5x it appears you were in "Z" class which is their 2nd lowest business class fare. If you had been in the even cheaper "P" class then you would have earned 1.0x miles flown, just like you did on TK.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,038
I'm guessing both flights were NOT in "J class".
"J" class on TK is if their lowest level business class, which does indeed earn 1.0x miles flown. All other business class fares earn 1.25x (C, D, Z and K), so on this one you were indeed on a J class fare.
"J" class on LH is full-fare business class, and earns 2.0x miles flown. As you only earned 1.5x it appears you were in "Z" class which is their 2nd lowest business class fare. If you had been in the even cheaper "P" class then you would have earned 1.0x miles flown, just like you did on TK.
"J" class on TK is if their lowest level business class, which does indeed earn 1.0x miles flown. All other business class fares earn 1.25x (C, D, Z and K), so on this one you were indeed on a J class fare.
"J" class on LH is full-fare business class, and earns 2.0x miles flown. As you only earned 1.5x it appears you were in "Z" class which is their 2nd lowest business class fare. If you had been in the even cheaper "P" class then you would have earned 1.0x miles flown, just like you did on TK.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,400
"J" class on LH is full-fare business class, and earns 2.0x miles flown. As you only earned 1.5x it appears you were in "Z" class which is their 2nd lowest business class fare. If you had been in the even cheaper "P" class then you would have earned 1.0x miles flown, just like you did on TK.
And, yes, the basic rationale is that UA gives higher PQM amounts on its joint venture partners. LH is one; TK is not.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,331
JV partners are: LH, LX, OS, SN, NH and AC
Lufthansa, Swiss, Austrian, Brussels, ANA and Air Canada
#9
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: LAX
Programs: TK M&S, LH MM, Global Entry, Hertz Gold, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 1,087
The most glaring example I know is LH P (discount business). It earns a big fat zero in TK’s FFP!