Finally! United.com "Chat with us" option plus NEW SMS option
Needed to call UA, and was looking for the number when I spotted this.
As someone who hates to be on the phone, this was amazing! Super fast and easy. https://www.united.com/ual/en/us/fly/contact.html https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...ba9a61d1fa.png Still needs some work as the page did time out on me, but the chat window remained open and active. Hope this eventually gets pushed to the app for in-flight support! |
Looks like a virtrual chat, not a live person -- is there a way to get a real human?
or is Alex back? https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cont...al-expert.html |
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 31437745)
Looks like a virtrual chat, not a live person -- is there a way to get a real human?
or is Alex back? I was connected to Mailyn D., but scrolled up to the top for the screenshot. Those are just the options like the phone system. |
Must be a trial; I don’t see that option. correction: sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t. Strange. |
In general, I've had good experiences using the chat option on United's facebook page.
|
Originally Posted by villox
(Post 31437971)
Must be a trial; I don’t see that option. correction: sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t. Strange. |
I was thinking: "Wait, didn't we have 'Ask Alex' way back at the merger?" :D
I have had reasonable luck with Twitter DMs and response time, but if this offers more real-time responses when available, it could be an improvement. I still prefer calling the 1K desk, but that's not always an option. |
Originally Posted by exerda
(Post 31438066)
I was thinking: "Wait, didn't we have 'Ask Alex' way back at the merger?" :D
I have had reasonable luck with Twitter DMs and response time, but if this offers more real-time responses when available, it could be an improvement. I still prefer calling the 1K desk, but that's not always an option. Email and twitter and much better from a cost perspective |
Originally Posted by exwannabe
(Post 31438211)
Around 15 years ago chat was "the thing" in the call service industry, but everybody soon found out is was really expensive and many dropped it.
|
Originally Posted by kale73
(Post 31438312)
reminiscent of Microsoft’s “Clippy”.
But back on topic: yes, it would be great if the domain that this runs off of (if not united.com; I haven't checked) is whitelisted for free access on UA inflight wifi. It would be great to have a text-based way to solve problems while in the air (without paying for wifi service). |
Originally Posted by aindfan
(Post 31438512)
"I think you're trying to get a ticket reissued. Would you like help with that?"
But back on topic: yes, it would be great if the domain that this runs off of (if not united.com; I haven't checked) is whitelisted for free access on UA inflight wifi. It would be great to have a text-based way to solve problems while in the air (without paying for wifi service). |
Originally Posted by villox
(Post 31437971)
Must be a trial; I don’t see that option.
correction: sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t. Strange.
Originally Posted by exerda
(Post 31438066)
...
I still prefer calling the 1K desk, but that's not always an option. Would be great if they can add this as a feature on the app like amazon does so you can just get a push notification when the agent replies. |
The issue with Chat function for customer service is how many simultaneous chats the agent is expected to work. If they are handling one or two at a time, it can work OK. But bean-counters want them to handle more, and then it gets frustrating and not effective. And they also tend to want off-shore / ESL agents to handle them, as there is no voice accent issue, which is OK if the agent has the necessary language skills. But Chat tends to bring out acronyms and internet slang, which can be a struggle.
It could be a great niche for in-flight assistance though. If United is rolling this out, it is due to some perceived cost savings for them and not as a customer service enhancement. |
Originally Posted by exwannabe
(Post 31438211)
Around 15 years ago chat was "the thing" in the call service industry, but everybody soon found out is was really expensive and many dropped it. Problem is there is a long turn around around between replies. Even with agents handling a few concurrent chats it still slow compared to voice.
Originally Posted by goodeats21
(Post 31439124)
The issue with Chat function for customer service is how many simultaneous chats the agent is expected to work. If they are handling one or two at a time, it can work OK. But bean-counters want them to handle more, and then it gets frustrating and not effective.
If you want the undivided attention of an agent, always call. |
Originally Posted by exwannabe
(Post 31438211)
Around 15 years ago chat was "the thing" in the call service industry, but everybody soon found out is was really expensive and many dropped it. Problem is there is a long turn around around between replies. Even with agents handling a few concurrent chats it still slow compared to voice.
Email and twitter and much better from a cost perspective |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:46 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.