WHY is UA 960 cancelled today (1 Aug 2019)? Rescheduled as UA2827?
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
WHY is UA 960 cancelled today (1 Aug 2019)? Rescheduled as UA2827?
my gf is supposed to travel on that flight. Now scrambling to find a rebooking option so she makes connex to NCE. Reason for canellation?
#2
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Carolina
Programs: UA LT Gold, American Kettle, Hertz #1 Presidents Circle, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 927
"We're sorry to let you know that your flight (UA 960) on Aug.1st has been canceled because of a schedule disruption caused by a change in our operations today."
Possibly fallout from all the east coast issues yesterday due to the weather? From the reports I saw, it was not a good day from DC all the way up to Boston for the airlines yesterday.
#3
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
They put her on UA 2827 with a 1h40m connection time at FRA which should be enough IF this replacement fight happens and isn’t further delayed. Can I demand UA rebook her on a partner with flights arriving at a similar time? They are saying because the new flight theoretically gives her enough time, no change
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,352
#5
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,388
Okay, that's just weird... they canceled 960 and scheduled the same frame to operate as an extra section 2827 just two hours later. Why they didn't just delay is beyond me.
You can try to ask for a partner routing, but UA is not obliged to provide since they have rebooked on UA metal, and it seems like the new routing is perfectly reasonable. 1h40 is plenty of time to connect at FRA, so seems unlikely an agent would do anything else unless you can come up with a good reason. N16009 is on its way from TLV and should make the extra section just fine.
You can try to ask for a partner routing, but UA is not obliged to provide since they have rebooked on UA metal, and it seems like the new routing is perfectly reasonable. 1h40 is plenty of time to connect at FRA, so seems unlikely an agent would do anything else unless you can come up with a good reason. N16009 is on its way from TLV and should make the extra section just fine.
#7
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
Okay, that's just weird... they canceled 960 and scheduled the same frame to operate as an extra section 2827 just two hours later. Why they didn't just delay is beyond me.
You can try to ask for a partner routing, but UA is not obliged to provide since they have rebooked on UA metal, and it seems like the new routing is perfectly reasonable. 1h40 is plenty of time to connect at FRA, so seems unlikely an agent would do anything else unless you can come up with a good reason. N16009 is on its way from TLV and should make the extra section just fine.
You can try to ask for a partner routing, but UA is not obliged to provide since they have rebooked on UA metal, and it seems like the new routing is perfectly reasonable. 1h40 is plenty of time to connect at FRA, so seems unlikely an agent would do anything else unless you can come up with a good reason. N16009 is on its way from TLV and should make the extra section just fine.
#8
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 6,010
Okay, that's just weird... they canceled 960 and scheduled the same frame to operate as an extra section 2827 just two hours later. Why they didn't just delay is beyond me.
You can try to ask for a partner routing, but UA is not obliged to provide since they have rebooked on UA metal, and it seems like the new routing is perfectly reasonable. 1h40 is plenty of time to connect at FRA, so seems unlikely an agent would do anything else unless you can come up with a good reason. N16009 is on its way from TLV and should make the extra section just fine.
You can try to ask for a partner routing, but UA is not obliged to provide since they have rebooked on UA metal, and it seems like the new routing is perfectly reasonable. 1h40 is plenty of time to connect at FRA, so seems unlikely an agent would do anything else unless you can come up with a good reason. N16009 is on its way from TLV and should make the extra section just fine.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,388
They could post the delay with just as much advance warning and wouldn't have to dump pax (probably with a seatmap scramble) onto an extra section. That and carriers really care about their completion statistic, see all the 20+ hour delays just to avoid a cxl going on the record. It's just weird...
#10
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,301
This has a lot to do with semantics. While you many know the difference, may posters here do not. They are green and when they ask these questions or make that kind of statement, the group here will be sure to set the right expectations and give suggestions.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,878
They put her on UA 2827 with a 1h40m connection time at FRA which should be enough IF this replacement fight happens and isn’t further delayed. Can I demand UA rebook her on a partner with flights arriving at a similar time? They are saying because the new flight theoretically gives her enough time, no change
I agree that demanding is rarely (if ever) the right tactic, especially with an airline - I find being nice and phrasing these as requests, using words like please and thank you, smiling, etc. often gets me the outcome I prefer. Not always, but often. If I were the OP, that’s what I’d try.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,368
They could post the delay with just as much advance warning and wouldn't have to dump pax (probably with a seatmap scramble) onto an extra section. That and carriers really care about their completion statistic, see all the 20+ hour delays just to avoid a cxl going on the record. It's just weird...
I suspect that they wanted the current UA 960 passengers to have lower priority (or not all automatically get seats) for space on the special section flight, perhaps because there are stranded passengers from earlier IROPs that should take precedence over nonstatus travlers on UA 960. If the flight number is cancelled, they won't owe VDB/IDB compensation to anyone who isn't confirmed on the special section.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,352
OP: Collierkr is correct, BTW. Even if you really meant "how likely is UA to accommodate this request," threads like this end up getting read by other people who may not understand that nuance. You end up with frustrated passengers yelling at gate agents because they didn't get what they believed they deserved... based on reading a post where the wording was unclear.
#14
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,761
The simplest answer -- if UA believes they can deliver the passenger in time for the connection, UA is going to focus on the UA based solution they have in place. Being concerned that there maybe, might be a delay, that might create a problem, is not likely to get a positive reception or a chance to a partner flight.