United 757 vs 787-8
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 241
United 757 vs 787-8
hi
will be flying united from SFO to IAD on July 16 in first. I dont travel first often, but special occasion with wife.
when I booked, it was on the 11pm (787-8)
for some reason they moved us to the 10:30pm (757-200)
Is the quality of the united first seat/product the same? Should I insist on moving back?
thx in advance?
will be flying united from SFO to IAD on July 16 in first. I dont travel first often, but special occasion with wife.
when I booked, it was on the 11pm (787-8)
for some reason they moved us to the 10:30pm (757-200)
Is the quality of the united first seat/product the same? Should I insist on moving back?
thx in advance?
Last edited by ac3000; Jul 11, 2019 at 6:04 am
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,460
The seat and service will be basically the same.
However, I would slightly prefer the 787 because of the higher cabin pressure. The 757 is blocked for about 10 extra minutes flight time, if that is significant to you.
edit add: you can spend some or a lot of time looking through the following threads as well to get more ideas
Consolidated Where to Sit on a United Plane Threads
Everything You Want to Know About Where to Sit on a United Dreamliner 787-8
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unit...200-16-bf.html
However, I would slightly prefer the 787 because of the higher cabin pressure. The 757 is blocked for about 10 extra minutes flight time, if that is significant to you.
edit add: you can spend some or a lot of time looking through the following threads as well to get more ideas
Consolidated Where to Sit on a United Plane Threads
Everything You Want to Know About Where to Sit on a United Dreamliner 787-8
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unit...200-16-bf.html
Last edited by fumje; Jul 11, 2019 at 6:18 am
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,410
Note that if you care a lot about aisle access (you probably don't traveling with a companion on a short red-eye), only the 787s have that from the center block of 2-2-2.
#7
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,453
788. The cabins are newer and the middle aisle seats require no climbing over.
I've never noticed any difference in air quality. YMMV.
The 788 does not have Polaris seats.
The 788 does not have Polaris seats.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: In between IAD and DCA
Programs: UA Plat 1.1MM , Marriott Gold Elite, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,262
Definitely try and get on the 787 if you can, for the better cabin experience, and possibility of two aisle seats together in the middle. The IFE is better too, in terms of quantity of movies and TV shows. The 757, IME, is the worst international plane for IFE.
But if you plan on just sleeping the entire flight, you'll be fine on the 757.
But if you plan on just sleeping the entire flight, you'll be fine on the 757.
#9
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,428
I have done my fair share of true longhaul to and from Asia and do not feel any different on787.
And for all intents and purposes the Biz seat is the same on 788.
And for all intents and purposes the Biz seat is the same on 788.
#10
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: All of them, UA-Plat, 1MM*G
Posts: 881
THIS is what mystifies me. Why were you moved? These things (generally) don't happen at random. I see both flights still on the schedule, and both with seats available. If you had an issued ticket for the flight that you wanted, and UA refuses to move you back to that flight, you have a DoT complaint.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,400
The only way the DOT would be involved is if this were due to an overbooking situation, and I see no indication of that; the original flight is J9 Y9. (It's even PZ2 IN2 I1 for anyone who would like a nice ride to DC on Tuesday).
#12
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: BART Platinum, AA Plat Pro
Posts: 1,158
In general wide-body comfort is superior to narrow-body, holding configuration constant. But technically the 757 at 2-2 has an extra inch of space for each seat versus the 787 at 2-2-2 (using 24" aisles). The 787 cabin should be quieter, but noise from other passengers should be less on the 757 (fewer within an X meter radius).
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,038
The higher cabin pressure and humidity levels on the 787/A350 are greatly overstated (don't click through if you'd prefer to keep any placebo effects untouched).
#14
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: All of them, UA-Plat, 1MM*G
Posts: 881
On what basis? UA is not charging any extra for carriage, and they're within the terms of the CoC.
The only way the DOT would be involved is if this were due to an overbooking situation, and I see no indication of that; the original flight is J9 Y9. (It's even PZ2 IN2 I1 for anyone who would like a nice ride to DC on Tuesday).
The only way the DOT would be involved is if this were due to an overbooking situation, and I see no indication of that; the original flight is J9 Y9. (It's even PZ2 IN2 I1 for anyone who would like a nice ride to DC on Tuesday).
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,400
There's little reason for UA to do these things, and they don't exactly lead to customer goodwill, but that doesn't make them illegal. UA's CoC clearly gives them the ability to make these changes.