Diverted flight and compensation

Old Jun 29, 2019, 4:37 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 332
Diverted flight and compensation

I was on UA 4435 EWR-YYZ on Jun 20. Scheduled departure at 1520. Actual dep was 16:58. All was normal as indicated shortly after take off until 30 minutes prior to arrival. We were advised that due to adverse weather condition (rain and thunderstorm) suspended all takeoffs and landings.
As our aircraft did not have enough fuel to circle around YYZ and the crew on board would not be able to work further hours as per regulation, we would be landing in BUF. After landing in BUF, we waited 1.5 hours for a bus to take us to YYZ. Actual arrival at YYZ was 23:05.

I understand that the airlines have responsibility to your final destination regardless of the mode of transport. However, why did UA choose to land in BUF and not YHM, Hamilton Ontario. There was no adverse weather affecting YHM. Are there any regulations as to which alternate airports an
airline can divert its flight. Furthermore, would passengers be entitled to any compensation based on the arrival time in the final destination due to the diverted flight?
canadianidol is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2019, 4:41 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,684
UA doesnt staff YHM for a very simple answer. Im sure there are tons of others, such as where the APIS data was sent to
fastair is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2019, 4:41 pm
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Miami, Florida
Programs: AA ExPlat, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Spire, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,009
Airlines generally land where they have operations and not at the absolute closest airport to the intended destination.

There's no compensation due in situations like this when flights are diverted due to weather.
TXJeepGuy likes this.
joe_miami is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2019, 4:53 pm
  #4  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,567
Originally Posted by canadianidol
...
I understand that the airlines have responsibility to your final destination regardless of the mode of transport. However, why did UA choose to land in BUF and not YHM, Hamilton Ontario. There was no adverse weather affecting YHM. Are there any regulations as to which alternate airports an
airline can divert its flight. ...
None that I am aware of but airlines have preference for where they have staff to assist and/or are sure the right type of equipment for that aircraft type is available.

In true emergencies, the above considerations will have little weight and the "closest" airport capable of handling the aircraft and passengers will be selected. In non-emergencies, the convenience for the carrier will carry more weight.

Originally Posted by canadianidol
... would passengers be entitled to any compensation based on the arrival time in the final destination due to the diverted flight?
Weather caused diversions are outside the control of the carrier, so no.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2019, 5:04 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,925
There are no mandatory compensation laws in the US for delayed flights (even if it is their fault). The only mandatory compensation situations are for involuntary denied boardings due to oversales. They might give you some miles or a voucher for future travel if you complain, but the amount is at their discretion.
xliioper is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2019, 8:46 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP...couple hotels and cars too
Posts: 4,548
Question: if crew times out while in the air, that isnt cause for diversion, correct?

So crew timing shouldnt be 'the reason'.

But even without that as an excuse, the ariirline acted within the rules. IMO
Exec_Plat is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2019, 8:52 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,131
Originally Posted by Exec_Plat
Question: if crew times out while in the air, that isnt cause for diversion, correct?

So crew timing shouldnt be 'the reason'.

But even without that as an excuse, the ariirline acted within the rules. IMO
The divert was likely due to fuel. The fact they then couldn't continue on to YYZ after landing in BUF (presuming the weather cleared enough to do so) would likely have been due to crew hours.
jsloan likes this.
docbert is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.