Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA orders 20 E175s, comments on A321XLR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2019, 4:10 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by EmailKid
As I understand it, 787 is quite a bit cheaper. Methinks there's a reason Norwegian, being na LCC, is buying 787 and not 330neo or 350 @:-)
I think it’s more that when Norwegian started buying wide bodies neither the 330neo or the 350 in their current configuration existed.

The sales figures show that 787 is dominating the a330 and the lower end of the 350 range (where they have similar cabin area).
rmadisonwi likes this.
Newman55 is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2019, 4:15 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by EmailKid
As I understand it, 787 is quite a bit cheaper. Methinks there's a reason Norwegian, being na LCC, is buying 787 and not 330neo or 350 @:-)
No, it is not cheaper.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2019, 4:31 pm
  #48  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,428
Originally Posted by fly18725


No, it is not cheaper.
Is it possible to get a source?

Everything I've read has indicated that 787 is cheaper, even said to be significantly cheaper. Makes sense, with larger fuselage there is more material to pay for.
EmailKid is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2019, 4:38 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by EmailKid
Is it possible to get a source?

Everything I've read has indicated that 787 is cheaper, even said to be significantly cheaper. Makes sense, with larger fuselage there is more material to pay for.
Nothing I can publicly link to. Aircraft appraisers publish values, which is helpful if you believe there is a correlation between price and value.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2019, 5:41 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,447
Originally Posted by EmailKid
Is it possible to get a source?

Everything I've read has indicated that 787 is cheaper, even said to be significantly cheaper. Makes sense, with larger fuselage there is more material to pay for.
Public list prices are pretty much useless as a point of comparison, and Airbus/Boeing are very aggressive discounters off "list" price. Sure, a 787-8 is going to be cheaper on unit cost than an A350-100, but on a normalized basis (looking at projected cash flows over the life of the asset, for instance) 787 and A350 will be thoroughly competitive on price.
EWR764 is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2019, 8:20 pm
  #51  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,830
This thread is having great difficulties staying on topic.

The side discussion on Avianca has been moved the exisiting Avianca's majority shareholder (used shares as collateral) breached UCH loan terms

This thread was started about the E175 purchase and a side comment about the A321XLR, which spun out a discussion about the Paris Airshow and Boeing's presence at the airshow (E175 to Boeing at Paris Airshow?) and that has lead to some 737MAX discussion.

As we already have an active 737MAX thread, let's try to keep most of the MAX discussion, in https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unit...ch-2019-a.html. The PR issue at the Paris Airshow is certainly an issue for Boeing, but any discussion of the causes seems best for the original 737MAX thread (and we don't need another 737MAX thread).

So let's try to keep the discussion in this thread to things related to the OP and title.

WineCountryUA
UA coModerator

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jun 18, 2019 at 8:29 pm
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2019, 9:22 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: All of them, UA-Plat, 1MM*G
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by EWR764
Public list prices are pretty much useless as a point of comparison, and Airbus/Boeing are very aggressive discounters off "list" price. Sure, a 787-8 is going to be cheaper on unit cost than an A350-100, but on a normalized basis (looking at projected cash flows over the life of the asset, for instance) 787 and A350 will be thoroughly competitive on price.
As EWR764 correctly says, "cheaper" to an airline is a plane's lifetime cost. Because the B787 was a completely new design and is entirely composite, it may be more expensive to build than the A350 (which borrowed greatly from the A330/340 and is only partially composite). But the B787's advantage over the A350 is likely in its operating costs and performance capability. Note that Airbus also seems to need to use special versions of the A350 to match the B787's basic performance capabilities. This creates all sorts of extra operating costs as tiny sub-fleets need to be maintained.

UA (and every other major airline) will make its fleet decisions based both on its current needs, and on the lifetime costs of the planes on offer that can meet those needs.
seenitall is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2019, 2:39 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 7,418
Meanwhile, American ordered 50 321XLRs (30 conversions from 321neo orders).

https://onemileatatime.com/american-...a321xlr-order/
drewguy is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2019, 2:53 pm
  #54  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,428
Originally Posted by drewguy
Meanwhile, American ordered 50 321XLRs (30 conversions from 321neo orders).

https://onemileatatime.com/american-...a321xlr-order/
Sure, but their fleet has A319, B738/max8 and A321, so that just makes sense.

Those would be the new additions, they also have B757 and from the merger A320.
EmailKid is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2019, 9:28 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Programs: MYOB
Posts: 1,291
Back to the topic at hand

Is there anyone who thinks adding these planes (E-175 in case it had been forgotten) for the markets they will be used on, is a bad idea? I would take them over a CR7 any day., and certainly over a 145 or the Devil’s Chariot. If it frees up CR7’s to be 550-ized, and those replace. CR2, how can that be bad?
xzh445 is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2019, 5:34 am
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 10,158
Originally Posted by xzh445
Is there anyone who thinks adding these planes (E-175 in case it had been forgotten) for the markets they will be used on, is a bad idea? I would take them over a CR7 any day., and certainly over a 145 or the Devil’s Chariot. If it frees up CR7’s to be 550-ized, and those replace. CR2, how can that be bad?
Anything that gets rid of CR2s is good, but at these numbers I don't see it fundamentally changing my everyday experiences.
UAX has about 150+ CR2s, and nothing is set in stone that they are being replaced when the CR5s come on line.
goodeats21 is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2019, 6:17 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,118
Originally Posted by goodeats21
Anything that gets rid of CR2s is good, but at these numbers I don't see it fundamentally changing my everyday experiences.
UAX has about 150+ CR2s, and nothing is set in stone that they are being replaced when the CR5s come on line.
Wasn't the story the total number of 50-seat aircraft was not to increase? If so, every CRJ700 to CRJ550 conversion will cause a CRJ200 to go out of service (or E145 but I don't think that was the plan).
JimInOhio is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2019, 6:52 am
  #58  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 19,501
Originally Posted by EmailKid
No, CRJ 200 are not going anywhere soon by the look of it
CRJ200s "not going anywhere" (i.e. grounded) would be applauded by many.
kale73 is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2019, 7:27 am
  #59  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,447
Originally Posted by JimInOhio
Wasn't the story the total number of 50-seat aircraft was not to increase? If so, every CRJ700 to CRJ550 conversion will cause a CRJ200 to go out of service (or E145 but I don't think that was the plan).
50 seaters are uncapped per the UPA, as long as UAX doesn't exceed a certain percentage of systemwide block hours, so UA isn't obligated to remove them as CRJ-550s come online.
EWR764 is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2019, 9:18 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: UA 1K 1MMer & LT UC (when flying UA); Hyatt Credit Cardist; HHonors Diamond; Marriott Gold via UA 1K
Posts: 6,956
Originally Posted by goodeats21
Anything that gets rid of CR2s is good, but at these numbers I don't see it fundamentally changing my everyday experiences.
UAX has about 150+ CR2s, and nothing is set in stone that they are being replaced when the CR5s come on line.
At minimum, I wish that UA would only run the CR2's on flights under 500 miles, to small markets only. I fly one route that's 631 miles, and it is BRUTAL even when we arrive early.
EWR764 likes this.
SS255 is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.