Passenger removed for using phone

Old May 21, 19, 5:15 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.6MM, Hertz PC
Posts: 4,128
Originally Posted by mikesyr18 View Post

The FA was just upset because the passenger said something back. This isn't about safety, it's about power tripping whether you believe that or not.
Unless passenger said: "It's not like I am going to blow up the plane by making a call. If I'd want to blow up this plane I wouldn't use a phone to do it!"
FA responds: "Excuse me?", and goes to talk to captain.
narvik is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 5:16 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,544
Originally Posted by narvik View Post
There seem to be rather strong opinions expressed in this thread considering the blatant lack of pertinent information.
I agree completely, and —

Originally Posted by mikesyr18 View Post
Already said pax should have to listen to safety briefings and instructions. Read the post after the post you quoted.

The FA was just upset because the passenger said something back. This isn't about safety, it's about power tripping whether you believe that or not.
— in my experience there are a lot more mouthy or uncooperative passengers than there are power tripping FA's, so on balance one seems more likely than the other. Both exist, but given what we know and what we don't, that's where I put my estimate.
fumje is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 5:17 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: HHonors, TrueBlue, Delta SkyMiles, Hyatt Discoverist, Starwood Preferred Guest, American Airlines.
Posts: 2,035
Originally Posted by narvik View Post
Unless passenger said: "It's not like I am going to blow up the plane by making a call. If I'd want to blow up this plane I wouldn't use a phone to do it!"
FA responds: "Excuse me?", and goes to talk to captain.
That's still a stupid reason to use "excuse me?" in a sentence.

Originally Posted by fumje View Post
— in my experience there are a lot more mouthy or uncooperative passengers than there are power tripping FA's, so on balance one seems more likely than the other. Both exist, but given what we know and what we don't, that's where I put my estimate.
Fair point, but what's the ratio of pax to FA's?

Either way, FA's are the ones on the job and should be held to a higher standard.
MSPeconomist likes this.
mikesyr18 is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 5:56 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott Titanium (LT Plat), Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,753
Best response I've heard from a passenger replying to an FA request to get off a call - "I'm not talking to anyone, I'm recording a speech." She smiled and just waited a moment to see what he would do. He put the phone away (no way to tell if he was hanging up or just exiting the record app).
tarheelnj is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 6:07 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morris County, NJ
Programs: UA 1K/*G, Avis Pres, Marriott Plat
Posts: 1,775
That seems rather harsh, but depending on what the passenger said, maybe warranted. At least maybe a discussion with the captain before getting tossed?

i once had an FA who (playfully) thought I wasn’t paying enough attention during the safety demo, so she decided to quiz me. Actually asked “How many exit doors are on the plane?”

I replied “There are 4 exit doors on this Airbus A320, two on each side of the aircraft. There are also 4 overwing exits. In the event of a water landing, do not open the overwing exits unless advised by a crew member.”

She bust out laughing and we had a great flight. It was a way to get the point across without having to be nasty - for either of us.

So my point being - it’s their job to enforce the regs. It can be done nicely (ie being playful) or by barking. As a passenger, we can either respond in kind, or take the high road.

The difference is that only one of us is responsible to the FAA. I try to stick to the “catch more flies with honey than vinegar” theory.
dmurphynj is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 6:29 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 288
This reminds me of the passenger next to me some years ago whose phone started ringing during our descent into SJU. From our side of the plane, no land was visible. So she pulled the phone from her purse, held it in her hand, and exclaimed "This is so weird. How am I even getting a signal?"
venomtrilogy is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 6:40 am
  #52  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,270
The problem is that when people start deciding when to obey and when to disregard, the problems multiply. It's not just electronics, but then it's seat belts. and something else.

It is highly unlikely that the Captain ordered the passenger removed unless the Captain was satisfied that the passenger had disobeyed a lawful crewmember instruction.

We don't need to debate the merits of the law, rules, or UA's policies here. Those are in place. If they are wrong, they should be changed, but the solution is not in violating them.

We have a situation where the Captain has made a determination that the passenger violated at least a UA policy and possibly more and accordingly he was removed.

Good on UA, the Captain, and the FA. Problem easily solved by obeying the crewmember instruction or pointing out that the phone is off/ in airplane mode. Me, if it was on, I would have shut it down. If it was in airplane mode, I would have shut it down. Not worth arguing.

The way to deal with an incorrect FA would have been to complain afterwards. The way to deal with a correct FA is to obey the lawful crewmember order.
wxguy, Halo117, wrp96 and 2 others like this.
Often1 is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 6:50 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: OZ Diamond, Jiffypark Manhattan Gold
Posts: 4,340
It would certainly be interesting to hear what his response was. I'm glad this story didn't end with "and another passenger from the gate was boarded after he was removed" because I've gotten that vibe a couple times that to get out of a VDB situation they've just FOUND someone to give the boot to.
MSPeconomist likes this.
drvannostren is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 6:58 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by mikesyr18 View Post
Right, and FA's should learn more respect towards the passengers, really. Passengers shouldn't have to be obedient like a bunch of dogs or else get kicked off the plane.

From reading multiple flight encounters between pax and FA's, it seems like the FA's need a lesson in the delivery of a message. You can get a clear message across without being rude or using the words "excuse me??." Saying, "excuse me??" outside of when you accidentally run into someone or interrupt a conversation makes me want to rip that person's hair out, and I'm sure many others feel the same way.

Perhaps airlines should make customer service lessons a priority during training.
You don't have to be a dog to be obedient.

If you are married... during the ceremony did you just make up answers in response to the officiant or did you do what you were told?
JimInOhio is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 7:03 am
  #55  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,004
Originally Posted by davie355 View Post
This is faulty. Flying is an essential form of transit in today's world. Irrespective of what you think of the phone rule, it is widely known to be a superfluous rule.
completely disagree. Your flaunting of the rules is why people die in evacuations and the like.
Collierkr is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 7:03 am
  #56  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,270
Originally Posted by JimInOhio View Post
You don't have to be a dog to be obedient.

If you are married... during the ceremony did you just make up answers in response to the officiant or did you do what you were told?
There are also certain things which are not an "ask". Don't forget that by the time this FA encountered the passenger, a significant amount of time had passed since the doors were closed and the general announcement regarding electronics had been made.
Often1 is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 7:23 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by Often1 View Post
There are also certain things which are not an "ask". Don't forget that by the time this FA encountered the passenger, a significant amount of time had passed since the doors were closed and the general announcement regarding electronics had been made.
This is pretty much how I view it, too. My experience, after more flights than I could ever hope to count, is I've never seen a passenger taken off a plane due to mobile phone usage. That alone suggests to me this instance must have been a very egregious situation. Also note that the OP makes no mention of any other passenger in the area protesting the removal. I know it's a leap but, if true, they must have concurred with what the FA was doing.
JimInOhio is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 7:32 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 92
I was on a PEK-CAN flight once (Chinese airline) and was using my phone which was on airplane mode while in the air and the sir stewardess screamed at me to put my phone away, even when I showed her I was on airplane mode. Some other airlines dont even allow you to take out your phone. It has to be turned off.
funkydory is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 7:35 am
  #59  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8,770
Maybe he was using an app that does audio transcription? I often "write" emails and notes by speaking into my phone. Most email, note taking, or messaging apps have this functionality these days. Much easier than typing on a little phone.
RoxyMountain is offline  
Old May 21, 19, 7:38 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,544
Originally Posted by funkydory View Post
I was on a PEK-CAN flight once (Chinese airline) and was using my phone which was on airplane mode while in the air and the sir stewardess screamed at me to put my phone away, even when I showed her I was on airplane mode. Some other airlines dont even allow you to take out your phone. It has to be turned off.
When was this? Until last year, it was not allowed to use phones at all on board. That was a rule from Chinese authorities.
wxguy likes this.
fumje is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: