View Poll Results: Mandatory Express Dining Service for East Coast TATL red-eye flights?
Is a good idea
106
40.77%
Prefer having a choice of regular or express
154
59.23%
Voters: 260. You may not vote on this poll
United Will Trial Mandatory New Express Dining Service Concept In Business Class
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 10,335
-RM
#18
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,416
This change also means FAs blocking the aisles with carts for a shorter period of time.
#19
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,768
There will never by 100% agreement on this but appears UA is testing to see if there is a strong preference for this on these short flights.
There does seem to be some support in this thread but there will be some preferring the previous way. Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
The preference of the many vs the preference of the few. We just don't know which is which.
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
Ah yes, another "brilliant" idea from Kirby
I want my dining service done properly, served from a cart. UA, and before it, CO, offered an express option for those that want everything at once so they can rest, while those who don't could still have the service offered properly.
This is just a pretext to further dumb-down the Polaris product under the phony guise of improving efficiency. Watch for the other shoe to drop. How are we suppose to order dessert if we can't even see the options? I assume a cold roll will be dumped on the tray instead of being served from a basket.
For those who want express dining, just request it.
I want my dining service done properly, served from a cart. UA, and before it, CO, offered an express option for those that want everything at once so they can rest, while those who don't could still have the service offered properly.
This is just a pretext to further dumb-down the Polaris product under the phony guise of improving efficiency. Watch for the other shoe to drop. How are we suppose to order dessert if we can't even see the options? I assume a cold roll will be dumped on the tray instead of being served from a basket.
For those who want express dining, just request it.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
#22
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,147
And THAT is a problem that needs to be solved. Forcing everyone into an abridged version (especially at a gateway that doesn't have a Polaris lounge as someone else pointed out) is not the answer.
A few years ago I had an SFO to Narita flight where the dinner service had the last of the plates collected 4 hours to the minute from when we took off - on a ~9 hour flight. Other airlines can manage to have the entire dining experience completed within ~90 minutes from take-off on shorter long-haul flights - there's no reason UA shouldn't be able too.
That said, I have to give United props for their existing Executive Dining option. Whilst most carrier do have something similar, in many cases it skips the main course and just gives the appetizer/salad/dessert but no main. My only real issue with the existing Executive Dining is that it makes it difficult to get the dessert (timing wise) which this new scheme might overcome.
A few years ago I had an SFO to Narita flight where the dinner service had the last of the plates collected 4 hours to the minute from when we took off - on a ~9 hour flight. Other airlines can manage to have the entire dining experience completed within ~90 minutes from take-off on shorter long-haul flights - there's no reason UA shouldn't be able too.
That said, I have to give United props for their existing Executive Dining option. Whilst most carrier do have something similar, in many cases it skips the main course and just gives the appetizer/salad/dessert but no main. My only real issue with the existing Executive Dining is that it makes it difficult to get the dessert (timing wise) which this new scheme might overcome.
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,592
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,916
But here is the counterpoint. When some wish to go to sleep due the short duration of the flight, they cannot...even if they order the express dining option. Why? Because the FAs make so much noise for the few in the cabin who want meal service drawn out. The lights plus noise make sleep impossible for me. Thus, it’s not so easy as saying make it optional and everyone is happy.
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,416
I'm obviously squarely in the camp of "just slop it out there and get it over with."
#26
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clinging to the edifices of a decadent past from the biggest city in America nobody really cares about.
Programs: (ಠ_ಠ)
Posts: 9,077
I get the mandatory express dining to get the cabin darker quick so people can get to sleep.
But it's a shame the new Polaris Lounge is not yet open at IAD as it could be pushed as a (better IMHO) replacement to the onboard food...think like what BA does for their evening F departing passengers.
I'd speculate the PL could offer better food options, better food quality, better booze , and so on than an in-the-air-offering from UA.
But it's a shame the new Polaris Lounge is not yet open at IAD as it could be pushed as a (better IMHO) replacement to the onboard food...think like what BA does for their evening F departing passengers.
I'd speculate the PL could offer better food options, better food quality, better booze , and so on than an in-the-air-offering from UA.
#27
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,277
Are ear plugs/noise cancelling headphones and an eye mask not an option to avoid the noise/light?
#28
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,356
Reminds me of an overnight flight on DL, from ATL to SCL (Santiago de Chile). I requested the Delta version of express dining, to maximize the sleep. They didn't ask me what dessert I wanted, and instead gave me all three dessert choices on an already crowded tray! Needless to say, I had to skip most of the three desserts, as otherwise the sugar high would have kept me awake...
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Mar 30, 2019 at 5:42 pm Reason: repaired quote
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,317
I welcome the ideas on routes from EWR/IAD to Europe. I usually just want to have a quick meals and go to sleep so I can be as fresh and awake as possible when I arrive.
This is a plus for business travelers from East Coast to Europe.
This is a plus for business travelers from East Coast to Europe.
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 29,969
There's nothing new about this. AA has offered "express" service on just about every long haul J flight. You simply get it all at once rather than courses. Not exactly rocket science.