Should United Cancel Its Order for 100 737 MAX 10s, & Order the A321neo?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,866
Should United Cancel Its Order for 100 737 MAX 10s, & Order the A321neo?
In light of the 737 Max Disasters, should United cancel its order for the 737 MAX 10, and order the A321neo? ( & maybe some A220s)
See also:
Could UA use 321neo to replace 757 / 767 as HA is doing for mainland flights?
United Considering 737 Max 10 and A321neo
See also:
Could UA use 321neo to replace 757 / 767 as HA is doing for mainland flights?
United Considering 737 Max 10 and A321neo
Last edited by BF263533; Mar 27, 2019 at 12:00 am Reason: Add A220 reference & links to A321neo threads
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,220
Yes, they should switch to the A321 and get it delivered with fewer seats per frame. Then we'd get both wider seats and more legroom.
But UA will act in its own interests, not those of its customers. It clearly has a sweetheart deal with Boeing, only using Airbus to test prices for them. They will always buy Boeing in the new market whether or not the product is superior or at a better price point.
But UA will act in its own interests, not those of its customers. It clearly has a sweetheart deal with Boeing, only using Airbus to test prices for them. They will always buy Boeing in the new market whether or not the product is superior or at a better price point.
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,423
Yeah we don't even need to talk about safety to reach this conclusion from the passenger's perspective. The 321 is a better aircraft for passenger comfort due to the wider cabin.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,718
The Max series won't look (or be) snakebit forever. Three years ago Volkswagen looked doomed because of the TDI emissions scandal, and there was talk of VW exiting the US market in a hail of criticism. Today that is mostly forgotten and VW sales have rebounded. The 787 had the longest, most tortured, error-filled gestation period of any Boeing commercial aircraft, its announcement and first revenue service were nearly a decade apart (2003-2011, with a fake "rollout ceremony" in 2007), and then the FAA grounded it in 2013 over the battery fires, but today all that is forgotten as well. Other airliners from the Comet to DC10 had long service lives following catastrophes related to design flaws.
So calm down.
So calm down.
#9
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Springfield,MO,USA
Programs: UA 1K MM, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,604
Neither. Buy up all the 757-200's and 767-300's (like they did with ex Hawaiian) they can get their hands on, re-manufacture / refurb like the Air Force does with old B52s, add new interiors, and just keep them flying. That will hold them till something else like new MOM comes along
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,882
Even when Boeing addresses the issues, which Im not convinced they are making a full effort to do from what Ive seen, theres public perception problem which could last a lot longer. Guaruda just canceled their MAX orders, and their statement cited customer confidence in the aircraft. Obviously, theyre in indonesia, which is particularly sensitive due to that being Lion Airs home. But Boeing has a real issue. My belief is that Boeing will see a lot more cancelations, especially if the grounding goes beyond more than a couple of months. And Id guess there is a good chance the program makes little $ for Boeing due to compensation theyll need to pay out, order cancelations as well as being forced to reduce pricing to get people to consider it any longer. Id bet there will be real pressure to eliminate order cancelation penalties as well.
Airbus, despite their backlog, probably has a huge sales advantage now, and yes, UA should consider buying from them. Ive always liked the 320s better anyway. UA May have more of its interests as a company in mind, but dont forget that if customers dont have a feeling that theyll be safe onboard the aircraft they fly in, then there might be no airline left, so the Airbus may fit quickly into UAs interests.
Either way, it will be interesting to see how this all shakes out in the weeks, months and years ahead.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
I suspect that delivery date is an extremely important consideration. At the moment, we don't know how long it will take Boeing to "fix" the MAX and begin deliveries again. (So far production seems to be continuing.) Unless UA can get an Airbus option to get some new aircraft fairly quickly, for now it seems better to stick with Boeing.
#13
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Yes, they should switch to the A321 and get it delivered with fewer seats per frame. Then we'd get both wider seats and more legroom.
But UA will act in its own interests, not those of its customers. It clearly has a sweetheart deal with Boeing, only using Airbus to test prices for them. They will always buy Boeing in the new market whether or not the product is superior or at a better price point.
But UA will act in its own interests, not those of its customers. It clearly has a sweetheart deal with Boeing, only using Airbus to test prices for them. They will always buy Boeing in the new market whether or not the product is superior or at a better price point.
Given the additional complexity of the telescoping landing gear, and that the MCAS system is going to have to work even harder to prevent this thing flying like a brick, I think there are some real risks in the MAX10.
That said, United is not interested in passenger comfort, and will go with fleet commonality over all, since its basic approach to its domestic fleet is ULCC.
But were I Boeing, I would be concerned about how the MAX10 is going to work out longer term... They better be 2000% sure there are no issues with the landing gear....
I suspect that delivery date is an extremely important consideration. At the moment, we don't know how long it will take Boeing to "fix" the MAX and begin deliveries again. (So far production seems to be continuing.) Unless UA can get an Airbus option to get some new aircraft fairly quickly, for now it seems better to stick with Boeing.
#14
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Programs: AAdvantage
Posts: 4
If you really travel on business, I doubt it. There's not time for nonsense like this, you have to fly the plane that shows up.
#15
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 223
If the global economy weakens, as some signals indicate, expect that backlog for both Airbus and Boeing to shrink. Even now, when the economy is fairly strong in most respects, airlines around the world still struggle to turn a profit. This, along with the rise of marginal manufacturers in Russia, Japan, China etc. will probably give airlines some choice and flexibility in which aircraft they order in the near future.