Last edit by: WineCountryUA
This is an archive thread, the active thread is "Upgrade certificates (GPUs & RPUs) are useless nowadays"
Archive thread "Upgrade certificates (GPUs & RPUs) are useless nowadays" {Archive}
Archive thread "Upgrade certificates (GPUs & RPUs) are useless nowadays" {Archive}
"Upgrade certificates (GPUs & RPUs) are useless nowadays" {Archive}
#976
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,416
Not much of a gain. Certainly not worth what we lost.
#977
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA MM Plat, UA 1MM, Hilton Lifetime Gold, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold, CLEAR, AS MVP Gold
Posts: 3,614
FWIW, I agree on the mileage redemption issue and predominantly this was how I flying my family in the past. I have mixed feelings about the instruments that are gifted. However, as basically everyone has said, the point is kind of moot as R space is as rare as Unicorns.
#978
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Upgrade never cleared. PN=R=0 throughout.
#979
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA MM Plat, UA 1MM, Hilton Lifetime Gold, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold, CLEAR, AS MVP Gold
Posts: 3,614
#980
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO
Programs: DL 3MM/FC/DM LT; LH FT LT; HH DIA
Posts: 347
I assume since we are flying together they will get same priority as me?
Thanks! hope to use up some of them :-)
#981
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,000
I am 1k and plan to fly to Europe with my wife and daughter on same flight (w fare) and I am planning to use GPU's but we all are on seperate Record Locators.
I assume since we are flying together they will get same priority as me?
Thanks! hope to use up some of them :-)
I assume since we are flying together they will get same priority as me?
Thanks! hope to use up some of them :-)
Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Jun 12, 2017 at 6:24 pm
#982
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,392
Unfortunately, if the reservation started as a separate PNR, then they will clear based on their own status.
#983
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Non-status pax under GS GPU was at bottom of the list, after few non-revenues.
These few ranked below were pretty sure to be non-revenues since they appeared at both BF and GF upgrade list (3-class PMUA planes).
Needless to say, the non-status pax never had a chance, despite of GS GPU.
#984
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: UA 1K; *G, AA Plat
Posts: 1,700
On day of departure, we can see upgrade list.
Non-status pax under GS GPU was at bottom of the list, after few non-revenues.
These few ranked below were pretty sure to be non-revenues since they appeared at both BF and GF upgrade list (3-class PMUA planes).
Needless to say, the non-status pax never had a chance, despite of GS GPU.
Non-status pax under GS GPU was at bottom of the list, after few non-revenues.
These few ranked below were pretty sure to be non-revenues since they appeared at both BF and GF upgrade list (3-class PMUA planes).
Needless to say, the non-status pax never had a chance, despite of GS GPU.
Also, there's no way non-revs would clear before a 'paying customer' on a GS GPU. No way at all. Could you imagine a GS sponsoring his/her mother and watching a non-rev get the upgrade? No effing way. It's also a policy violation. Customers on upgrades will clear before non-revs.
Just because a customer appears on BF/GF lists simultaneously does not always indicate non-rev.
#985
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: dark side of the moon
Programs: papa card, UA 1K
Posts: 707
On day of departure, we can see upgrade list.
Non-status pax under GS GPU was at bottom of the list, after few non-revenues.
These few ranked below were pretty sure to be non-revenues since they appeared at both BF and GF upgrade list (3-class PMUA planes).
Needless to say, the non-status pax never had a chance, despite of GS GPU.
Non-status pax under GS GPU was at bottom of the list, after few non-revenues.
These few ranked below were pretty sure to be non-revenues since they appeared at both BF and GF upgrade list (3-class PMUA planes).
Needless to say, the non-status pax never had a chance, despite of GS GPU.
#986
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO
Programs: DL 3MM/FC/DM LT; LH FT LT; HH DIA
Posts: 347
oops, sorry did not see the earlier post :-) Anyway, good news: I checked various dates (we are somewhat flexible) and found a flight to Europe showing R9!! Jumped on it, got tix reissued in W-class and redeemed 3 GPU's...Score :-) Only one left now
#987
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,000
Flexibility is the best way to overcome UA's stinginess. Well done...but this is the "GPUs are worthless!" thread
#988
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: UA 1K, BA GGL/CCR, TK Elite Plus, Marriott Gold4Lyfe, HH Diamond, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Tesco Blue
Posts: 270
What else can it mean?
What else could it mean? United doesn't do "cabin roll" lists like airlines that use other IT departure management systems, so that isn't it. I'm not meaning to sound .....y - I really would like to know what other possibilities it could be.
#989
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: UA 1K; *G, AA Plat
Posts: 1,700
I think the most common thing people have said are "displaced passengers". I'm not an expert enough to know what else it could have been. I just know that people have said again and again that showing up on multiple lists is not a 100% guarantee of non-rev.
#990
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,392
A (paid) premium cabin pax standing by will show up on both the standby list and the upgrade list for their cabin. I don't know if someone standing by for F would show in the J list (I sort of think not, though). For domestic flights, however, this is the other source of double-list pax.