United no longer forwarding luggage to SQ? {subsequent trip worked fine}
#16
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
It's quite easy, even across separate tix, if the agent knows what he/she is doing. A minute or two, as jsloan noted. Also, there's little chance this is a single ticket. Neither airline would sell RNO-SFO (UA), SFO-SIN (SQ)
This sounds like a classic MOLA situation at multiple levels.
This sounds like a classic MOLA situation at multiple levels.
#17
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
OP said he had an F ticket RNO-SFO. Though it is entirely possible that's the new "rule" the agents were referring to - it is all too common for agents to mis-apply a new rule beyond its actual scope. In fact, I'd say that's a very likely explanation for what OP was told.
#18
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Did the OP have a single ticket/itinerary or two separate ones? If it's a single ticket, the fact that UA and SQ interline (in fact, many pairs of airlines interline even though they aren't in the same alliance) should mean that the bag gets checked through, assuming that MCT isn't violated and there aren't pottential travel document problems known to UA.
Note that it's not a BE issue as OP is in domestic FC followed by international business class.
IMO "new corporate rule" is as valid as the "dog ate my homework" excuse. The agent's goal is just to make you go away without taking any additional time, so they make up whatever, including the lovely line that you should have received a letter.....
Note that it's not a BE issue as OP is in domestic FC followed by international business class.
IMO "new corporate rule" is as valid as the "dog ate my homework" excuse. The agent's goal is just to make you go away without taking any additional time, so they make up whatever, including the lovely line that you should have received a letter.....
#19
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SAN
Programs: 1K (since 2008), *G (since 1990), 1MM
Posts: 3,218
You need an agent who knows what they are doing. When interlining it can take an extra 5 minutes but my last trip attempting this in December which was two separate United tickets but a K fare took the 1K agent 20 minutes and the other 1K agent was trying to interline the pax next to me. Finally someone who knew what to do and five mins later it was fixed for me and the other pax. I did hear a comment that it is more difficult with SQ (although neither of our reservations involved SQ). BTW - return out of LHR with two separate United tickets think it took her an extra two minutes.
You need a check-in agent who knows what they are doing.
When I interline I always check with the transfer desk and again with the GAs. They thank me as they often tell me if I do not ask for the confirmation that they have the bags, then the bags may not make it onto the flight. Three years ago when traveling with a friend this was an issue and the GA was able to get them to track down the luggage and get it on the flight- I was on the same flight (same PNR originally but then auto split by United) and my bags had already been loaded.
Always pays to check at the transfer desk and with the GAs. May sound overly cautious but on the outbound I want my luggage to arrive with me.
You need a check-in agent who knows what they are doing.
It can be done, but is a certain amount of work, although UA to SQ on a single ticket should be like interlining 101. On the other hand, I've recently (after the last round of tightening) had UA interline our bags ORD-LHR on UA and then LHR-KEF on Icelandic on two tickets (don't ask!). But it took a long time and much clicking. As far as I can tell, the agent forced the LHR-KEF segment onto my UA itin and then printed out the tags. I say this since when I later checked my UA reservation online the LHR-KEF segment was showing there. I was planning to need to retrieve and recheck bags at LHR and was very pleasantly surprised. I was concerned enough that I checked at the Icelanding transfer desk at LHR - showing them the stubs and they said "you're good to go" and also seemed a bit surprised. I don't think the agent was supposed to do this, so lower your expectations.
In the past, when anyone traveling in INTL F (rip) had access to the GS checkin area at ORD I found those agents to be willing to go the extra mile and to do all sorts of rule bending.
In the past, when anyone traveling in INTL F (rip) had access to the GS checkin area at ORD I found those agents to be willing to go the extra mile and to do all sorts of rule bending.
Always pays to check at the transfer desk and with the GAs. May sound overly cautious but on the outbound I want my luggage to arrive with me.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Feb 11, 2019 at 3:46 pm Reason: merging consecutive posts by same member
#20
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: IAH, SGN, BKK
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 396
Might this be a status issue? I have frequently been challenged "You must be 1K or GS". I just looked at UA's site. There was information on interlining only to *A. I no longer find that information.
If this is truly a new policy I will need to find a new carrier after I cross my next MM level (43k miles from now).
If this is truly a new policy I will need to find a new carrier after I cross my next MM level (43k miles from now).
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
previous experiences also took lots of time
Yes it can be done - interline to SQ on a separate ticket. But give yourself some extra time to get it done
My return SQ connecting to UA at SIN the SQ agents have zero trouble. Every single time.
#23
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: IAH, SGN, BKK
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 396
I still see this text here, on United's site:
I have only had one agent (a GS agent having to help a lowly 1K) who refused to do it. Luckily another agent overheard & said "I know how to do this". The GS agent kept protesting "We're not supposed to do that!".
#24
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 7
OP,
Welcome to Flyertalk!
I've never had RNO not check my bag through on separate tickets, just took the agent a lot of time with the help desk (and once a big mess up with getting my passport into back into the system after my BP was issued and the gate scanner barfed (20 minute delay working with IT again) and almost didn't get on the plane even though my bags did). Most of my connections have been to OZ in LAX or BR in IAH or SFO and rare connections at ORD to OS usually leaving RNO in the afternoon. Obviously United is back to blowing off of their alliance obligations again or their IT staff can't bothered to deal with an issue that's been around for a very long time or non airport management doesn't want to actually make UA the Friendly Skies.
I'm always happy to work with the RNO crew especially when they know the issue is coming from higher up the food chain.
Welcome to Flyertalk!
I've never had RNO not check my bag through on separate tickets, just took the agent a lot of time with the help desk (and once a big mess up with getting my passport into back into the system after my BP was issued and the gate scanner barfed (20 minute delay working with IT again) and almost didn't get on the plane even though my bags did). Most of my connections have been to OZ in LAX or BR in IAH or SFO and rare connections at ORD to OS usually leaving RNO in the afternoon. Obviously United is back to blowing off of their alliance obligations again or their IT staff can't bothered to deal with an issue that's been around for a very long time or non airport management doesn't want to actually make UA the Friendly Skies.
I'm always happy to work with the RNO crew especially when they know the issue is coming from higher up the food chain.
While I have no objection to the agents never retaining what they learn on any given customer check-in, this claim at a "corporate approved" refusal to check bags through to SQ is too much.
#25
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,850
Until we hear this report from a different airport, I think this MOLA (including the "supervisor"). It is amazing what some agents will make up when they don't answer the real reason or just don't want to be bothered.
#26
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
It's such awful customer service. I can accept (hopefully with some grace), "I'm sorry I just can't make this work." But "it's a new rule from corporate" is the kind of thing that causes customers to switch airlines.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
I think it is a newish rule from corporate. Having been caught myself, I guess that at least some of this is due to the many partners charging for bags. I was caught in a UA to Swiss debacle where UA checked my bags through and then Swiss said I owed them baggage fees as the plane was boarding but they had no way to process the charge at the gate. I’d somehow booked into a no bags fare that showed nowhere in the UA record. Going landslide to the ticketing desk would have meant missing the flight. They finally comped me, but it was truly ugly. So the answer is “No transfer, no problems.”
#28
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
#29
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 7
It's working (for now?)
For the past year the process seems to be getting easier every time I fly. Until about October 2019 or thereabouts the agent always called the UA helpdesk to make the luggage check-through happen. And since then they've been doing it themselves. So there's either been a software upgrade or additional training. Keeping my fingers crossed they don't regress again...