United to try to avoid YYR / Goose Bay!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,356
United to try to avoid YYR / Goose Bay!
Not surprising. The WSJ article may only be for subscribers.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfo...-bay-1.5005484
https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/...-stranded.html
https://www.wsj.com/articles/united-...rs-11549297751
(Moderator add) From CBC story:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfo...-bay-1.5005484
https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/...-stranded.html
https://www.wsj.com/articles/united-...rs-11549297751
(Moderator add) From CBC story:
After more than 200 passengers spent a night locked inside a plane earlier this month, United Airlines is designating Goose Bay Airport for emergencies only. ...United Airlines Flight 179 was on its way to Hong Kong from Newark, N.J., when it landed in Happy Valley-Goose Bay for a medical emergency. The passenger was taken off and sent to hospital, but the rest were told they'd have to stay onboard while the crew dealt with a mechanical issue.
Last edited by l etoile; Feb 6, 2019 at 2:35 pm Reason: added a couple of graphs from story
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I think that it is an effort to get CBSA and the airport authority to work to fix the underlying issue, e.g., permitting passengers what amounts to transit access to the larger facility if whatever the diversion issue is will require ground time exceeding something reasonable.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,882
I’m kind of confused.
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
#4
Join Date: May 2001
Location: RNO, NV, USA.
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 5,059
I’m kind of confused.
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
#5
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: CLE
Programs: NEXUS, MileagePlus Silver, Frontier Diamond, IHG Spire, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 263
That's a good point. I'd be interested to see the results of an investigation. They likely just pushed out this article in a hurry to curtail the PR damage.
#6
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,531
I’m kind of confused.
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
#7
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: AA EXP, NH Plat, Former UA 1K
Posts: 5,644
I’m kind of confused.
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
The CBC article refers to UA changing to using other airports instead of YYR in ‘anything less than an emergency’. I’d like to know which UA flights have landed in YYR in non-emergency situations. Maybe there are scheduled flights that Im unaware of? If you’re spending thousands of $ in landing fees for an unscheduled stop, isn’t it pretty much only because of an emergency?
#8
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: KEWR
Programs: Marriott Platinum
Posts: 794
Assuming the weather is above minimums and that happens to be the nearest suitable airport, that’s where you go to get medical help for an ailing passenger.
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Both UA and CBC have dumbed the issue down for public consumption. You can be assured that UA's operations folks are well aware of the choices and can advise the Captain accordingly. Also worth remembering that while there may be a better alternative than YYR, that alternative may not be available for any number of reasons, e.g. local weather. Further, in large weather situations, YYR may be the only field capable of taking larger numbers of sizeable aircraft.
This was originally planned as a medical diversion which would have required a brief stop to offload the ill passenger, topping up the fuel and continuing on (or returning to EWR).
This was originally planned as a medical diversion which would have required a brief stop to offload the ill passenger, topping up the fuel and continuing on (or returning to EWR).
#10
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA GS 2MM
Posts: 947
Well UA949 LHR-SFO is off to BGR instead:
P LHR/OUT 924A L00.04 EST OFF 947A
P LHR/OFF 957A
P BGR/ETA 1128A FLIGHT DECK CREW
F BGR/ETD 104P
F SFO/ETA 431P L04.01
D FCF/FSTOP BGR ENRT LHR-SFO A/FLIGHT DECK CREW
SKED LHR ORIG 920A GTD B33 SHIP 2897
SFO 1230P TERM GTA 80
Comments:
0949/06FEBP LHR/OUT 924A L00.04 EST OFF 947A
P LHR/OFF 957A
P BGR/ETA 1128A FLIGHT DECK CREW
F BGR/ETD 104P
F SFO/ETA 431P L04.01
D FCF/FSTOP BGR ENRT LHR-SFO A/FLIGHT DECK CREW
SKED LHR ORIG 920A GTD B33 SHIP 2897
SFO 1230P TERM GTA 80
#11
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: KEWR
Programs: Marriott Platinum
Posts: 794
Well UA949 LHR-SFO is off to BGR instead:
P LHR/OUT 924A L00.04 EST OFF 947A
P LHR/OFF 957A
P BGR/ETA 1128A FLIGHT DECK CREW
F BGR/ETD 104P
F SFO/ETA 431P L04.01
D FCF/FSTOP BGR ENRT LHR-SFO A/FLIGHT DECK CREW
SKED LHR ORIG 920A GTD B33 SHIP 2897
SFO 1230P TERM GTA 80
Comments:
0949/06FEBP LHR/OUT 924A L00.04 EST OFF 947A
P LHR/OFF 957A
P BGR/ETA 1128A FLIGHT DECK CREW
F BGR/ETD 104P
F SFO/ETA 431P L04.01
D FCF/FSTOP BGR ENRT LHR-SFO A/FLIGHT DECK CREW
SKED LHR ORIG 920A GTD B33 SHIP 2897
SFO 1230P TERM GTA 80
Any situation with a crew change issue like this is done at a stateside airport to avoid the additional delay/hassle of Canadian customs.
If this situation occurs going to EWR we usually swap crews in BOS.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
BGR is also 700 miles from YYR. It's not as though these are all co-terminals.
BGR also has scheduled service from a number of airports, including UA from EWR. A lot easier to reunite a reserve pilot by flying her to BGR if the logistics work.
BGR also has scheduled service from a number of airports, including UA from EWR. A lot easier to reunite a reserve pilot by flying her to BGR if the logistics work.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Boston MA
Programs: UA 1K/1.5 million miler, SU Gold, JL Sapphire
Posts: 529
It is more than a tad ridiculous and frankly a lack of hospitality for the passengers not being able to stretch their legs in some kind of terminal.
What about border security? Goose Bay is as secure as you can get. It is not like you can walk out and hop on a bus to somewhere. You can either go south or west on a single road, and we are talking hundreds of miles before reaching major towns. Even small hamlets are separated by huge distances. Can't seriously expect passengers to suddenly elope Canadian immigration laws.
In Saint-John, Gander or even Sept-Iles, sure (even if it would be farfetched). But Goose Bay? Good luck with that!
Canadian authorities are making a mountain out of a molehole by not letting people out to stretch their legs.
What about border security? Goose Bay is as secure as you can get. It is not like you can walk out and hop on a bus to somewhere. You can either go south or west on a single road, and we are talking hundreds of miles before reaching major towns. Even small hamlets are separated by huge distances. Can't seriously expect passengers to suddenly elope Canadian immigration laws.
In Saint-John, Gander or even Sept-Iles, sure (even if it would be farfetched). But Goose Bay? Good luck with that!
Canadian authorities are making a mountain out of a molehole by not letting people out to stretch their legs.
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
It's their country and Canada can make the rules they consider appropriate.
#15
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Boston MA
Programs: UA 1K/1.5 million miler, SU Gold, JL Sapphire
Posts: 529