People Mover/ATS @O’Hare/ORD shuttle train ceases ops until 202? [REOPENED 11/3/21]
https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/pe...til-fall-2019/The People Mover, O’Hare’s shuttle train, to cease until Fall 2019
"The shuttle train that connects O’Hare Airport’s terminals, the People Mover, will be closed from early [a.m. Jan. 9,] 2019 through the fall as crews work to finish “the ongoing modernization and extension of the airport transit system. *** The department expects the upgrades to the People Mover — which carries 30,000 people per day — to be completed by next fall.In the meantime, the CDA will operate a shuttle bus service that will take passengers to and from the airport terminals via a new bus lane, the CDA said. *** The shuttle train’s closure is expected to worsen vehicle traffic around the airport’s terminal roadways, and the CDA is encouraging fliers to take the CTA Blue Line to and from the airport if possible. ***" |
This is crazy. Is there no way to keep the ATS system at least partially open?
|
Wait until this happens at EWR. And that one will be down for a lot more than nine months and will cut off connection to rail also!
|
So, if I arrive at ORD in T5 and need to get to T1, there will be a bus instead? |
No bid contract. I'll take the over on the completion date.
|
Originally Posted by sannmann
(Post 30599945)
So, if I arrive at ORD in T5 and need to get to T1, there will be a bus instead? This is what they did the last time I had to make the trek when the train was closed At they time they had alot of buses lined up so there was not much waiting. They had a large tent with fans setup due to the summer heat. It was not as fast as the train but not really that much longer. A bit more inconvenient since you have to lug your bag(s) on/off the bus. I don't understand why this would worsen vehicular traffic. Because the extra buses on the road? They say there will be a new bus lane. So they are removing one lane for cars and dedicating it to busses only? I also think it is ridiculous that their only solution to worsening traffic is to tell you to take the blue line. |
ORD is already less than desirable for international-to-domestic connections; this doesn't make things any better!
Originally Posted by Ted
(Post 30599881)
Wait until this happens at EWR. And that one will be down for a lot more than nine months and will cut off connection to rail also!
*= yes, I am familiar with the "creepy little IAH train", but it's essentially useless these days... does it even run anymore? |
|
Originally Posted by Buster CT1K
(Post 30599817)
This is crazy. Is there no way to keep the ATS system at least partially open?
Originally Posted by eng3
(Post 30599977)
At they time they had alot of buses lined up so there was not much waiting. They had a large tent with fans setup due to the summer heat. It was not as fast as the train but not really that much longer. A bit more inconvenient since you have to lug your bag(s) on/off the bus. I don't understand why this would worsen vehicular traffic. Because the extra buses on the road? They say there will be a new bus lane. So they are removing one lane for cars and dedicating it to busses only? I also think it is ridiculous that their only solution to worsening traffic is to tell you to take the blue line. At least passengers arriving in Terminal 5 and connecting to American or United can give the luggage back as soon as getting out of the border control area. For other passengers it was very difficult. And those passengers with luggage were blocking the exiting of the bus when arriving at Terminal 1. They had to get out of the bus with their luggage to let people out and some did not want to do that with the heavy luggage. What other choice do you propose for reducing the traffic instead of the blue line? Helicopters? |
Originally Posted by eng3
(Post 30599977)
A bit more inconvenient since you have to lug your bag(s) on/off the bus.
|
Originally Posted by Ted
(Post 30599881)
Wait until this happens at EWR. And that one will be down for a lot more than nine months and will cut off connection to rail also!
|
OK... here are some facts for those freaking out...
The system is being improved. Relax. |
They need to mark it better. I don't do a lot of domestic to intl at ORD and in September I had to do just that.
Took me few minutes to figure out where to go, then when I finally arrived at the station it was closed. No signs downstairs notifying about the closure. Found the bus and at 7pm there was no problem transferring to int terminal (UA to LO). I can't imagine transferring during the rush hour with the train down. As for EWR, at least you can walk from A to B to C and vice versa. You can't do that at ORD, and even if you could, it would probably take an hour for the connection that I did last summer. |
Originally Posted by bwiadca
(Post 30600407)
They need to mark it better. I don't do a lot of domestic to intl at ORD and in September I had to do just that.
Took me few minutes to figure out where to go, then when I finally arrived at the station it was closed. No signs downstairs notifying about the closure. Found the bus and at 7pm there was no problem transferring to int terminal (UA to LO). I can't imagine transferring during the rush hour with the train down. As for EWR, at least you can walk from A to B to C and vice versa. You can't do that at ORD, and even if you could, it would probably take an hour for the connection that I did last summer. |
Originally Posted by sannmann
(Post 30599945)
So, if I arrive at ORD in T5 and need to get to T1, there will be a bus instead?
Originally Posted by bwiadca
(Post 30600407)
I can't imagine transferring during the rush hour with the train down.
As for EWR, at least you can walk from A to B to C and vice versa. You can't do that at ORD, and even if you could, it would probably take an hour for the connection that I did last summer. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:53 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.