United Airlines Fleet Updates [2019 Edition]

    Hide Wikipost
Old Sep 2, 19, 12:35 am   -   Wikipost
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been on FT for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: Bunky
Wiki Link
The Fleet Status site is:
https://sites.google.com/site/unitedfleetsite/

At the site, you can find information about the interior features, livery, etc., for every plane in United's fleet.

United Airlines Equipment (Aircraft) Codes (via JOSECONLSCREW28)- code refers to type and configuration but not IFE:

pmCO
73S - B737-700 Guam Configuration (12/30/84 Slimline)
73G - B737-700 Slimline (12/36/78 config)
73R - B737-700 Slimline (12/36/78 config), former GUM and former Copa (PDE)
73Y - B737-800 Slimline Config (16/54/96 config)
73U - B737-800 Guam Slimline Configuration (16/42/108 config)
73Q - B737-800 Slimline (16/54/96) with SFP (a/c 3519 and above 16/48/102) 3528 and up Sky Interior, 3532 and up Sky bins
73C - B737-900 Slimline (20/42/117 config)
73L - B737-900ER Slimline Config (3413-3442 & 3479: 20/42/117), (3443-3478: 20/39/120) (3479 Sky Interior and Space bins)
37X - 737-MAX9 Slimline 20/48/111)
75B - B757-200 Int'l Config (16/45/108)
75E - B757-300 Slimline (24/57/156 config)
76P - B767-400ER (39/70/131 with Y crew mod)
78V - B787-8 (36/70/113 config)
78Z - B787-9 (48/88/116 config)
77Y - B777-200ER ("Version 2"/ 50/72/145 config)
77E - B777-200ER Polaris/PP (50/24/46/156)

pmUA
19S - A319 version 1 (8/42/78 config)
19C - A319 version 2 (ex-CZ frames) (8/42/78 config), different lavs
19? - A319 version ? (12/36/78 config)
20S - A320 version 1 (12/42/96 config)
20C - A320 version 2 (ex-CZ frames) (12/42/96 config), different lavs
20? - A320 version ? (16/36/96 config)
37K - B737-900ER (20/39/120 a/c 3801-3810 ) (20/42/117 a/c 3811-3894 Sky - a/c 3895-3899 Space Bins)
75K - B757-200 (formerly known as "ps") (28/42/72 config)
76C - B767-300ER 2-cabin non-Polaris (30J/49E+/135Y config)
76A - B767-300ER Polaris 2 class (30J/46E+/138Y config)
76L - B767-300ER Polaris/PP (46J/22PP/43E+/56Y config)
77G - B777-200 Domestic (Versions 3 & 4 / 28F/102E+/234Y config)
77J - B777-200ER 3-cabin (27xx Tail#'s) ("Version 1"/ 8F/40J/113E+/108Y config)
77Q - B777-200ER 3-cabin (20xx & 28xx Tail #s) ("Version 1"/ 8F/40J/113E+/108Y config)
77U/N - B777-200ER Polaris/PP (50J/24PP/46E+/156Y)
77T - B777-300ER Polaris/PP (60J/24PP/62E+/204Y)
78U - B787-9 AC# 968-972 48J/88E+/116Y config)
78X - B787-10 AC# 1001 and up 44J/21PP/45E+/199Y config)

Here's what each of the facilities do historically:
HKG, heavy widebody maint and reconf (also heavy GUM 737 maint); 763/772GE Polaris mods
XMN 772PW Polaris mods, 787 mod, 777/787 heavy maint
LCQ, Airbus heavy and some medium heavy maint, Airbus Inductions and mods, 319/320 reconfiguration
DLH, Airbus maintenance
MIA, reconfiguration and maintenance, all except 787/777
HOU, 737 heavier maintenance, some shorter mod work
SAT 757 maint
SFO, Airbus D checks, heavy 772 maint, 737NG C checks, other maint.
MCO, 737/757 maintenance, some mods.
IAH, light maint
SEA, 77W, 739 new delivery induction, some 789s as well
DEN, IAD, 789 new delivery induction
RFD, 777 ADS-B, previous: 752 scimitar winglets, 737NG reconfigurations, 753 slimlines
Paint: VCV, AMA, CWF, FTW paint
PVG, 788 modifications/WiFi
PEK, some widebody maint.

Services ended at INT and MCN - Appears services suspended or ended at PEK/PVG and the below
SKF 39M final induction installations

ILN some 763 maint
VQQ some 763 maint

Previous Related Threads
United Airlines Fleet Updates [2018 Edition]
United Airlines Fleet Updates [2017 Edition]
United Airlines Fleet Updates [2016 Edition]
United Airlines Fleet Updates [2015 Edition]
United Airlines Fleet Updates [2014 Thread]
United Airlines Fleet Updates {2012-2013}
Print Wikipost

Old Feb 7, 19, 3:27 pm
  #136  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 69,099
The list currently shows the new A319 orders as arriving with Ku-band wifi. This is no longer accurate. Viasat announced this morning that the next 34 A319s will arrive with its Ka-band service, similar to that being installed on the 737 MAX fleet.

(Link to my coverage of the news; per FT rules you've been warned.)
sbm12 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 19, 8:00 am
  #137  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 69,099
Originally Posted by atword View Post


Polaris map now shown for UA1810 on Feb 5.
Finally reentered commercial service today on UA86.
atword likes this.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 19, 9:00 am
  #138  
TA
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,083
77W just appeared in service on EWR-HKG route as I was searching randomly, March 1. Doesn't assuage my frustration / anger at UA though, for not releasing any significant award space though, for the entire spring months...
TA is offline  
Old Feb 9, 19, 10:42 pm
  #139  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,756
39M:
N47512 exited SEA Induction 2745/9Feb - no first revenue flight shown yet.

772:
N211UA entered VCV paint 2799/5Feb
Bunky is offline  
Old Feb 10, 19, 6:46 pm
  #140  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland OR
Programs: United 1K 1MM, Marriott Rewards Gold, Hilton HHonors Silver
Posts: 437
763:
N660UA completed a test hop at HKG 2692/11Feb.

That was the last of the 3-class ships into mod (12/16)
usbusinesstraveller is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 7:23 am
  #141  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA 1K | Marriott Ambassador (LT Plat) | National Exec Elite | Global Entry | HH Silver
Posts: 322
772:
N228UA - Scheduled for test hop on 13-Feb. Should return to service shortly after
GMoneyCO is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 8:17 am
  #142  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: NA
Posts: 31
When will the A359 delivered to UA? The 772 are so old already... (no matter ER or non ER)
A330343X is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 8:20 am
  #143  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,869
Originally Posted by A330343X View Post
When will the A359 delivered to UA?
UA's management clearly does not want the A350. I will personally be surprised if they are ever delivered.
jsloan is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 2:04 pm
  #144  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: UA
Posts: 803
Originally Posted by A330343X View Post
When will the A359 delivered to UA? The 772 are so old already... (no matter ER or non ER)
They deferred to 2022.

Originally Posted by jsloan View Post
UA's management clearly does not want the A350. I will personally be surprised if they are ever delivered.
I share the same sentiment but don't understand why they upped the "order" to 45.
thejaredhuang is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 2:13 pm
  #145  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,869
Originally Posted by thejaredhuang View Post
I share the same sentiment but don't understand why they upped the "order" to 45.
Well, an A350 order is more valuable to UA than an A350 airplane would be. It gives them leverage over both companies -- they take it to Boeing and say "make me a better offer," and they take it to Airbus and say "make me a deal on the A320 series or I'll cancel."

I assume they had to up it to 45 in order to get Airbus to agree to defer delivery.
jsloan is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 2:19 pm
  #146  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 296
So I am not really familiar with how those contracts work but presumably UA can't just cancel with no penalties? Maybe they paid some sort of deposit they now can't get back? Point being, are they really better off forfeiting that money than taking new planes?
LXFlyer is online now  
Old Feb 11, 19, 2:31 pm
  #147  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,869
Originally Posted by LXFlyer View Post
So I am not really familiar with how those contracts work but presumably UA can't just cancel with no penalties? Maybe they paid some sort of deposit they now can't get back? Point being, are they really better off forfeiting that money than taking new planes?
There's always a penalty, but everything's negotiable.

I don't know the financials in detail. All I know is that you don't continually defer a purchase the way that UA has if you are actually attempting to acquire the goods in question.

It's often better to take one short-term hit than to acquire an asset that you're expecting to be a money-loser.
jsloan is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 2:40 pm
  #148  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BOS<>NYC<>BKK
Programs: UA 4MM LT-GS; AA1MM; Amtrak S+; MAR LT TITAN; PC Plat; HIL DIA; HYA GLOB
Posts: 3,752
My guess is that UA is waiting for Boeing to formally launch/offer the NMA (aka 797), rumored to be at the June air show in France. Then UA can negotiate for a large order of 777Xs and 797s. I too believe the A350 will be cancelled -- maybe in exchange for some number of A320neos and/or A321neos.
jsloan, artvandalay and oopl like this.
wxguy is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 4:35 pm
  #149  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,756
My guess is if the MMA aircraft is what UA wants they can keep the 350 order or replace narrowbodies with 320/321. But, if the MMA doesn't look like it would work well for UA, then they can convert the 350 orders to the 321LR, if it is proved to work well as a 757 replacement.
Who knows what the MMA will be. Narrowbody to replace 757, a 767 looking aircraft that has good cargo capability, something completely different.
I can't think of why an airline would want something like the 762, stubby twin aisle with maybe 7 or 8 across. Efficiency is with 6 across single aisle or at least 8 across twin aisle with standard LD3 containers.
Bunky is offline  
Old Feb 11, 19, 7:31 pm
  #150  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR/SEA
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 13,224
Originally Posted by jsloan View Post

There's always a penalty, but everything's negotiable.

I don't know the financials in detail. All I know is that you don't continually defer a purchase the way that UA has if you are actually attempting to acquire the goods in question.

It's often better to take one short-term hit than to acquire an asset that you're expecting to be a money-loser.
Back in the day, IIRC, NW was among first to order the DreamLiner (ANA launch customer, CO launch N. American customer). pmUA came along a little later IIRC, splitting the order between 787 and 350.

Now to the point - post merger DL did not want 787s, deferred at first, but actually cancelled relatively quick - of course they had the luxury of Boeing's delays (those by many accounts really hurt CO who bet big time on DreamLiner).

Who knows what the penalty was, but DL did not want this plane for some reason, and IIRC just a few years ago again rejected it in favor of A330 NEO.
EmailKid is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread