Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
(Post 32021967)
Will be interesting to see how it progresses. I hope they did not close down the OTC whiskey bar/lounge further down in C3 - has the best drinks in Terminal C IMO. I also wonder if there will be any views - and if there’s any chance at all they build an outdoor deck.
During UAs hardhat tour of the BOS lounge build, they said they had future plans to open outside but I don't think it ever happened. |
Originally Posted by manstein58
(Post 32023658)
Meatball joint gone the way of Nineveh and Tyre. Was also told new club will have 20(!!!) showers
|
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
(Post 32025397)
I’ll believe it when it’s in a PR announcement.
And even after showers "might" be installed, the elimination of showers at the C130 club and then the taking of the club to become EWR Polaris means nothing is guaranteed. Especially at EWR. Ever. David |
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 32025411)
I'll believe it if there are showers when the UC actually opens. Given history of PR announcements and overenthustastic marketeers as well as the guaranteed over run in both cost and schedule of _anything_ built under PANYNJ at EWR, there's never a guarantee.
And even after showers "might" be installed, the elimination of showers at the C130 club and then the taking of the club to become EWR Polaris means nothing is guaranteed. Especially at EWR. Ever. David |
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
(Post 32025657)
When it comes to showers in domestic UCs, I am highly skeptical since they have been moving away from that.
|
As with all things United, skeptical is the way to bet. I was relaying what I was told; will be largest UC in network and will resemble LAX Club
|
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
(Post 32025397)
I’ll believe it when it’s in a PR announcement.
|
the status quo - then & now
I visited both the pop-up & the old UC lounge @ Gate 74 this week. Why are they so close together?
A UA agent told me (with a straight face) the reason is because there is very limited space available @ EWR. Which I take to mean that UA does not have access to any more space! Terminal One is (at least) three years away. Can UA continue to expand flights out of EWR with one lounge & one pop-up? The pop-up has decent snacks (pita chips, potato salad, bean salad, pop in cans) Interestingly, the snacks are all pre-packaged i.e. designed to compete with take out? Reminded me of the old AC landside lounge @ LGA! |
Originally Posted by Antonio8069
(Post 32027955)
I visited both the pop-up & the old UC lounge @ Gate 74 this week. Why are they so close together?
A UA agent told me (with a straight face) the reason is because there is very limited space available @ EWR. Which I take to mean that UA does not have access to any more space! Terminal One is (at least) three years away. Can UA continue to expand flights out of EWR with one lounge & one pop-up? The pop-up has decent snacks (pita chips, potato salad, bean salad, pop in cans) Interestingly, the snacks are all pre-packaged i.e. designed to compete with take out? Reminded me of the old AC landside lounge @ LGA! |
Originally Posted by SS255
(Post 32027256)
UA originally made a PR announcement that there would be showers in the LAX UC. ;)
David p.s. And it never rains in Southern California too |
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 32029129)
Ouch.
David p.s. And it never rains in Southern California too Reportedly, this will be the largest United Club in the system. |
The elimination of showers at UCs at United's international hubs is one of the most short-sighted and stupid decisions that United has ever made. After flying more than 8 hours, the showers at the EWR main UC (before it was converted to a Polaris Lounge) was one of the few things which made a EWR layover bearable. As United continues to devalue MileagePlus and UC membership, especially for long haul flyers, I've given up hope of United doing the right thing for its customers, but at least with my UC membership, I can take advantage of showers at Star Alliance clubs when flying internationally.
|
Originally Posted by auandagbug
(Post 32050024)
The elimination of showers at UCs at United's international hubs is one of the most short-sighted and stupid decisions that United has ever made. After flying more than 8 hours, the showers at the EWR main UC (before it was converted to a Polaris Lounge) was one of the few things which made a EWR layover bearable. As United continues to devalue MileagePlus and UC membership, especially for long haul flyers, I've given up hope of United doing the right thing for its customers, but at least with my UC membership, I can take advantage of showers at Star Alliance clubs when flying internationally.
|
I was down in this area the other day. To say the new space is huge is an understatement. If it’s actually two floors...wow it’s big.
i still question the location as it still leaves the middle concourse drastically underserved by clubs. one note is gates c125-128 are crammed into a funnel now by this construction. Makes access really difficult |
Originally Posted by Xyzzy
(Post 32050032)
Well, if flying Polaris and connecting at EWR one still has access to showers. The change is that UA wants us to fork over $/PP for Polaris. I agree - it was a huge d:owngrade.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:18 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.