Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA to operate 6 TATL markets with 78J from EWR; increase GUM-Japan flying

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA to operate 6 TATL markets with 78J from EWR; increase GUM-Japan flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2018, 4:39 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
UA to operate 6 TATL markets with 78J from EWR; increase GUM-Japan flying

Announced internally UA will operate 6 TATL routes from EWR using the 78J beginning summer 2019 routes to be loaded in the coming weeks. Also with improvements Guam will see additional Japan flying beginning April 2019.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 5:08 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clinging to the edifices of a decadent past from the biggest city in America nobody really cares about.
Programs: (ಠ_ಠ)
Posts: 9,077
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
Announced internally UA will operate 6 TATL routes from EWR using the 78J beginning summer 2019 routes to be loaded in the coming weeks. Also with improvements, Guam will see additional Japan flying beginning April 2019.
Interesting. How does UA view the 78J in terms of lining up with the existing fleet? 772 or 764 replacement?
EWR764 and ContinentalFan like this.
J.Edward is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 5:08 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/NYC/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,752
very cool news about GUM; it's good to see trends continuing to shift positively there.
riphamilton is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 5:58 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Programs: SPG, Marriott, UA, AA, CX, SQ
Posts: 165
I know of zero inside knowledge, but if I were to guess, I’d say

LHR • CDG • FRA • MUC • ZRH • …

6th one is hard to guess cuz I feel equal chance between BRU GVA AMS.
williambruno1975 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 6:01 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: UA MileagePlus 2MM
Posts: 1,567
Originally Posted by J.Edward
Interesting. How does UA view the 78J in terms of lining up with the existing fleet? 772 or 764 replacement?
Is the 787J supposed to have 40 seats in Polaris? Will it have PE? Seems perhaps markets like CDG, MAD, AMS, FCO, MXP etc which have big tourist demand in summer. The 77W has 60 Polaris seats and the the other pmUA 772's (except the HD version) are being upgraded to 50 Polaris seats.... Or maybe they send the 78J to London?
adambrau is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 6:03 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
Originally Posted by williambruno1975
LHR • CDG • FRA • MUC • ZRH • …


ZRH needs more capacity than 44J seats upfront and would have a hard time filling up the back.
78J might be too big overall for GVA - currently running on the 763.

Last edited by cesco.g; Sep 18, 2018 at 6:17 pm Reason: changed to correct J-seat count
cesco.g is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 6:07 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by adambrau
Is the 787J supposed to have 40 seats in Polaris? Will it have PE? Seems perhaps markets like CDG, MAD, AMS, FCO, MXP etc which have big tourist demand in summer. The 77W has 60 Polaris seats and the the other pmUA 772's (except the HD version) are being upgraded to 50 Polaris seats.... Or maybe they send the 78J to London?
78J Configuration will be 44J/21W/253Y 318 seats total.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 6:10 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
The leaked seatmap was: 44 Polaris, 21 PE, 45 E+, and 208 Y. 78J Seat Map (leaked)

That's at the lower end of the UA widebodies for J:Y ratio, but still pretty good compared to DL or AA.
Kacee is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 6:28 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/NYC/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,752
Originally Posted by williambruno1975
I know of zero inside knowledge, but if I were to guess, I’d say

LHR • CDG • FRA • MUC • ZRH • …

6th one is hard to guess cuz I feel equal chance between BRU GVA AMS.
is the rumored 46J/22W/99Y 763 premium-heavy configuration still in the pipeline? if so, that would be ideal for EWR-LHR/GVA/ZRH.
riphamilton is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 6:41 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by riphamilton
is the rumored 46J/22W/99Y 763 premium-heavy configuration still in the pipeline? if so, that would be ideal for EWR-LHR/GVA/ZRH.
Not a rumored configuration is happening and will be installed on the 14 2-cabin 763s with the CO diamond seats as well as the 3 ex HA 763s. The 763s that already have true Polaris seating will not see this configuration and will remain as is.
riphamilton likes this.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 6:53 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
Surely they will replace service now flown by the 763s ( or any other 767 variation ). The 767 family is at this moment, at least for me, the only acceptable
long haul plane with a couple friendly configuration in the back compared to the other slave ships in UA's line up with the 9 and 10 across configurations.
Sad to see them go.
Exleftseat is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 7:05 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: UA MileagePlus 2MM
Posts: 1,567
Originally Posted by Exleftseat
Surely they will replace service now flown by the 763s ( or any other 767 variation ). The 767 family is at this moment, at least for me, the only acceptable
long haul plane with a couple friendly configuration in the back compared to the other slave ships in UA's line up with the 9 and 10 across configurations.
Sad to see them go.

I think the 763's are sticking around a while as the 3 class (and I think 2 class) versions are all getting the Polaris seats and economy class will remain 2-3-2. So you should be good for at least another 5 years!

Adam
adambrau is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 7:21 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 690
EWR-ATH seems an obvious contender.

Or maybe that's just wishful thinking!
jasonp622 likes this.
jpezaris is online now  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 7:30 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
My guesses would be:

-FRA
-BRU
-CDG
-TLV
-DUB
-BCN

The first 3 I picked because UA tends to run 772s ex-EWR on those routes, especially during the summer. TLV is within range, and I could see them adding a slight upgauge from sCO 772 (although it would decrease J seats - so who knows). The last two I picked because UA used HD 772s this summer, and maybe they think there is perhaps enough room to drive a little more revenue from upfront despite sacrificing ~50 seats in the back.

Unpopular opinion: I don't think UA uses any of these on EWR-LHR.
PsiFighter37 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2018, 7:37 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SEA
Programs: UA MP (1K, 1MM)
Posts: 268
Originally Posted by riphamilton
very cool news about GUM; it's good to see trends continuing to shift positively there.
I wish they'd bring back the PVG-GUM route; it was cancelled just as PVG became my home airport. (Granted it twice weekly and at awful days of the week and times, but it still would beat a flight having to connect at NRT, HND, or TPE to get there...)
SFHokie is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.