![]() |
Wait, UA and CO hasn't yet integrated their crew?! It's been... 8 years?
I believe AA has already integrated their pmAA and pmUS crews? |
Originally Posted by smxflyer
(Post 30200052)
Hart: Stay tuned. We’re going to be making quite a bit of investment in Dulles in the next year or two, and it goes beyond just what the customer sees as they pass through our terminal. There are a lot of infrastructure investments we need to make, but it’s a great hub for us, does very well. As we move forward, we’re going to be making some investments that will really impact the customer experience as well. It will be significant. It will be noticeable to our customers.
|
Originally Posted by MrAndy1369
(Post 30200311)
Wait, UA and CO hasn't yet integrated their crew?! It's been... 8 years?
I believe AA has already integrated their pmAA and pmUS crews? |
Originally Posted by Live4Upgrade
(Post 30200220)
I'm concerned that GPUs will only be from Y to PE and no longer from Y to C. That's how I read the tea leaves. I
Worst case: Huge devaluation of GPU (and 1K) from Y to PE instead of C. (Ofcourse, there is no limit to how much worse "worst case" could be) Best case: Allow all or some elites to choose PE for free like E+. I think unlikely |
Originally Posted by eng3
(Post 30200445)
Exactly
Worst case: Huge devaluation of GPU (and 1K) from Y to PE instead of C. (Ofcourse, there is no limit to how much worse "worst case" could be) Best case: Allow all or some elites to choose PE for free like E+. I think unlikely |
Originally Posted by eng3
(Post 30200445)
Exactly
Worst case: Huge devaluation of GPU (and 1K) from Y to PE instead of C. (Ofcourse, there is no limit to how much worse "worst case" could be) Best case: Allow all or some elites to choose PE for free like E+. I think unlikely |
Wishful thinking maybe? RPUs for PE..maybe even at a cost of two per upgrade.. GPUs stay the same.
|
Originally Posted by gmt4
(Post 30200531)
Wishful thinking maybe? RPUs for PE..maybe even at a cost of two per upgrade...
|
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 30200342)
My first thought upon reading this was an automated baggage handling system.
|
I read their attitude as a bit smug and self-satisfied. Am i off base? |
Originally Posted by manstein58
(Post 30200653)
I read their attitude as a bit smug and self-satisfied. Am i off base? |
Originally Posted by gmt4
(Post 30200531)
Wishful thinking maybe? RPUs for PE..maybe even at a cost of two per upgrade.. GPUs stay the same.
I'm also interested in see what UA prices PE at. I've been looking at some PE on other airlines and the difference between PE and a P-Fare is ~500 R/T. for that money, I'll take the up front seating over PE. |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 30200342)
My first thought upon reading this was an automated baggage handling system.
Originally Posted by DCEsquire
(Post 30200134)
Like - finally moving gate C and D to where they were originally planned to be when they built the AeroTrain?
AeroTrain at Washington Dulles International Airport Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority |
If GPUs/miles+copay upgrades turn into Y->PE only I will have to rethink who I fly with. These days, I take international trips where the R space is and a good fare. If that goes away, there is no more point in me flying UA. Would just have to become a free agent and go for cheap J fares for Europe and Asia.
|
Originally Posted by drowelf
(Post 30200975)
I just really don't see them restricting a GPU to Y->PE only. Thats going to piss off pretty much 100% of the 1K/GS population. I can see GPU Y (W or higher) ->C or PE (Any) ->C and maybe RPU Y (Select Class) -> PE. But we will see. There have not been a whole lot of Flier Friendly changes at any airline in the recent years.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.