Lack of BF capacity on SFO/LAX-EWR
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11
Lack of BF capacity on SFO/LAX-EWR
United (and the other airlines) is missing a big opportunity to sell more BF seats on these transcon routes.
United seems to have significantly decreased the frequency of SFO-EWR flights — what happened to hourly flights on the 752s? Now there’s a 6, 8:40, etc and many are on the 8 across in BusinessFirst 772.
The problem is that you’ve replaced multiple 16/28 seat BF 752s with a single 772 with 28 BF seats. Week after week, I book last minute for business travel, and there is no BF available even as GS. And every other airline is booked up in First as well (even the non-lieflat VA product).
What do we think is going on? There is a major business contingent that needs to get on these transcons every week (sometimes multiple times in a week) and is willing to pay $1000+ each way. United, at least start running more flights on the busy Monday and Thursday travel days!
United seems to have significantly decreased the frequency of SFO-EWR flights — what happened to hourly flights on the 752s? Now there’s a 6, 8:40, etc and many are on the 8 across in BusinessFirst 772.
The problem is that you’ve replaced multiple 16/28 seat BF 752s with a single 772 with 28 BF seats. Week after week, I book last minute for business travel, and there is no BF available even as GS. And every other airline is booked up in First as well (even the non-lieflat VA product).
What do we think is going on? There is a major business contingent that needs to get on these transcons every week (sometimes multiple times in a week) and is willing to pay $1000+ each way. United, at least start running more flights on the busy Monday and Thursday travel days!
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DTW, but drive to/from YYZ/ORD
Programs: Chase Ultimate Rewards 2MM, Diner Club points
Posts: 31,895
#4
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BOS<>NYC<>BKK
Programs: UA 4.3MM LT-GS; AA1MM; Amtrak SE; MAR LT TITAN; PC Plat; HIL DIA; HYA GLOB
Posts: 4,391
#5
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA GS, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Mlife NOIR
Posts: 320
I’ve noticed the same. As EWR increasingly becomes UA’s hub for Europe and SFO becomes UA’s hub for Asia, SFO-EWR p.t.s. is increasingly filled with people connecting onwards (e.g., SFO-EWR-AMS/BCN/BOM, EWR-SFO-SIN). Couple this with the fact that capacity has been seriously reduced and you get p.t.s. flights that are now often fully booked upfront one week. This means that when I’m just looking to fly premium transcon last minute, I often have to end up flying AA.
The irony is that UA used to have upward of 18 SFO-EWR, many on which were on the premium heavy 28J 752s. Now with far fewer flights and the pathetic 777HDs, I feel like AA sometimes has as much premium seat capacity as UA on SFO to NYC. The AA transcons all have 20J and 10F seats on an A321!
The irony is that UA used to have upward of 18 SFO-EWR, many on which were on the premium heavy 28J 752s. Now with far fewer flights and the pathetic 777HDs, I feel like AA sometimes has as much premium seat capacity as UA on SFO to NYC. The AA transcons all have 20J and 10F seats on an A321!
UA really needs to step up its game when it claims these two cities as major hubs. (And when it’s at it, it should really give Polaris lounge access to p.t.s. flyers as the product is currently uncompetitive compared to AA/Delta in that regard.)
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DTW, but drive to/from YYZ/ORD
Programs: Chase Ultimate Rewards 2MM, Diner Club points
Posts: 31,895
If you're selling out the cash for business class over the pond, it seems you'd want to at least fly non-stop from SFO then connect in Europe.. SFO-EWR-Europe (and the return journey more so) seems crazy
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
That's true, but seats can't be added in increments of one. Maybe they'll figure it out and have day-of-week pricing with a premium for Mondays.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: UA-1K MM, AA-Gold, DL-Silver, AS-MVP
Posts: 2,508
The irony is that UA used to have upward of 18 SFO-EWR, many on which were on the premium heavy 28J 752s. Now with far fewer flights and the pathetic 777HDs, I feel like AA sometimes has as much premium seat capacity as UA on SFO to NYC. The AA transcons all have 20J and 10F seats on an A321!
UA really needs to step up its game when it claims these two cities as major hubs. (And when it’s at it, it should really give Polaris lounge access to p.t.s. flyers as the product is currently uncompetitive compared to AA/Delta in that regard.)
AA has 5 flights = 50F/100J, or 150 total premium seats.
UA has 10 flights (3 premium 752, 6 regular 752, and 1 772HD) = 264 total premium seats.
#9
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: Marriott Platinum Elite, National Executive, United Gold
Posts: 1,181
I think there is just a lack of appropriately configured aircraft to meet the demand - the 77G/H should be relegated to Hawaii and midcons, and UA should really think about creating a dedicated 739/MAX 10 fleet with the Zodiac Optima seats for premium transcon service absent the launch of the MoM or any stopgap 763s. Whether this would make sense from a ROI perspective, I don't know.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DTW, but drive to/from YYZ/ORD
Programs: Chase Ultimate Rewards 2MM, Diner Club points
Posts: 31,895
#11
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC: UA 1K, DL Platinum, AAirpass, Avis PC
Posts: 4,599
I’ve noticed the same. As EWR increasingly becomes UA’s hub for Europe and SFO becomes UA’s hub for Asia, SFO-EWR p.t.s. is increasingly filled with people connecting onwards (e.g., SFO-EWR-AMS/BCN/BOM, EWR-SFO-SIN). Couple this with the fact that capacity has been seriously reduced and you get p.t.s. flights that are now often fully booked upfront one week. This means that when I’m just looking to fly premium transcon last minute, I often have to end up flying AA.
The irony is that UA used to have upward of 18 SFO-EWR, many on which were on the premium heavy 28J 752s. Now with far fewer flights and the pathetic 777HDs, I feel like AA sometimes has as much premium seat capacity as UA on SFO to NYC. The AA transcons all have 20J and 10F seats on an A321!
The irony is that UA used to have upward of 18 SFO-EWR, many on which were on the premium heavy 28J 752s. Now with far fewer flights and the pathetic 777HDs, I feel like AA sometimes has as much premium seat capacity as UA on SFO to NYC. The AA transcons all have 20J and 10F seats on an A321!
UA really needs to step up its game when it claims these two cities as major hubs. (And when it’s at it, it should really give Polaris lounge access to p.t.s. flyers as the product is currently uncompetitive compared to AA/Delta in that regard.)
Though come later in the spring summer it's up to 14 nonstops for UA. The only hole is the 2pm hour (there's a 1:30 and 3), but there's a 5pm in the mix, as well as the new 1am redeye.
Net more lie flat domestic transcon capacity out of SFO than before, but what passenger wouldn't want to see even more premium airframes and premium frequency.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,026
what I find surprising that UA does not upgauge EWR/BOS-SFO during high demand dates like this week. A couple of 764s should be somehwere available during the winter season.
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,448
This is nothing new, there have been complaints about lack of last minute J inventory on the ps routes ever since the move from JFK to EWR, which as has already been noted shifted more connecting traffic onto these flights.
#15
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PHL
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Raddison Platinum, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 5,268
I agree this is an issue. I'm out of PHL and I frequently will compare EWR-SFO with PHL-SFO. EWR-SFO is often nearly half the price as PHL-SFO. EWR-SFO has better frequency but it is inconvenient to drive up to EWR. Ironically, on PHL-SFO, I have a higher chance of upgrading even on an A319 than on EWR-SFO where I have nearly zero chance. If I actually had some chance of getting upgraded, I'd probably fly EWR-SFO more often.