Rumor: CX to leave OW for Star: UA implications?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ANP
Programs: UA 1k, Marriott Plat, HH gold, Avis/Hertz Pres
Posts: 1,408
Rumor: CX to leave OW for Star: UA implications?
UA Exec meeting today at IAD had talks CX to leave OW when IAD is launched and announce *A. What does this mean for UA?
btw that first suite!!!!!
btw that first suite!!!!!
#3
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/NYC/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,752
source? because the OP of the a.net thread i read this rumor on earlier spelled qantas "quantas" in the same post. i'm calling #fakenews
EFC: i can see CX joining *A at some point, mainly because of their CA ties. this is nothing new. what i'm doubting is that (a) this change is imminent, and (b) it was divulged at this alleged meeting at IAD.
EFC: i can see CX joining *A at some point, mainly because of their CA ties. this is nothing new. what i'm doubting is that (a) this change is imminent, and (b) it was divulged at this alleged meeting at IAD.
Last edited by riphamilton; Dec 14, 2017 at 4:00 pm
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Airline industry braces for China Southern exit from Skyteam alliance, setting up clash with Cathay Pacific | South China Morning Post
That is as good a version of the story as any of the crap floating around. The theory is that China Southern has to leave SkyTeam to partner with AA now that American owns a small chunk and once that happens (and CZ moves into OW) that CX will leave because it doesn't want to be competing just across the border with another OW member. Putting aside that the two airlines don't really compete for the same passengers today despite their closely located hubs there are plenty of reasons to think it is reasonable or stupid.
As for the impact on UA, if CX joins *A then figure some code-share beyond Hong Kong (but not into mainland China) as well as on the US side. In other words, exactly what the AA/CX relationship looks like today. That said, UA still have the NH JV (and CX won't be in a JV because no open skies and China isn't going to change that any time soon) so I'd bet the cheaper fares, at least for JV markets, would still mostly be on UA/NH metal.
As to the F suite rave by the OP, are you thinking of CX or the new SQ or EK suite?
That is as good a version of the story as any of the crap floating around. The theory is that China Southern has to leave SkyTeam to partner with AA now that American owns a small chunk and once that happens (and CZ moves into OW) that CX will leave because it doesn't want to be competing just across the border with another OW member. Putting aside that the two airlines don't really compete for the same passengers today despite their closely located hubs there are plenty of reasons to think it is reasonable or stupid.
As for the impact on UA, if CX joins *A then figure some code-share beyond Hong Kong (but not into mainland China) as well as on the US side. In other words, exactly what the AA/CX relationship looks like today. That said, UA still have the NH JV (and CX won't be in a JV because no open skies and China isn't going to change that any time soon) so I'd bet the cheaper fares, at least for JV markets, would still mostly be on UA/NH metal.
As to the F suite rave by the OP, are you thinking of CX or the new SQ or EK suite?
#7
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: UA:1k; MR: PLT; Hilton: Gold
Posts: 1,324
Airline industry braces for China Southern exit from Skyteam alliance, setting up clash with Cathay Pacific South China Morning Post
That is as good a version of the story as any of the crap floating around. The theory is that China Southern has to leave SkyTeam to partner with AA now that American owns a small chunk and once that happens (and CZ moves into OW) that CX will leave because it doesn't want to be competing just across the border with another OW member. Putting aside that the two airlines don't really compete for the same passengers today despite their closely located hubs there are plenty of reasons to think it is reasonable or stupid.
As for the impact on UA, if CX joins *A then figure some code-share beyond Hong Kong (but not into mainland China) as well as on the US side. In other words, exactly what the AA/CX relationship looks like today. That said, UA still have the NH JV (and CX won't be in a JV because no open skies and China isn't going to change that any time soon) so I'd bet the cheaper fares, at least for JV markets, would still mostly be on UA/NH metal.
As to the F suite rave by the OP, are you thinking of CX or the new SQ or EK suite?
That is as good a version of the story as any of the crap floating around. The theory is that China Southern has to leave SkyTeam to partner with AA now that American owns a small chunk and once that happens (and CZ moves into OW) that CX will leave because it doesn't want to be competing just across the border with another OW member. Putting aside that the two airlines don't really compete for the same passengers today despite their closely located hubs there are plenty of reasons to think it is reasonable or stupid.
As for the impact on UA, if CX joins *A then figure some code-share beyond Hong Kong (but not into mainland China) as well as on the US side. In other words, exactly what the AA/CX relationship looks like today. That said, UA still have the NH JV (and CX won't be in a JV because no open skies and China isn't going to change that any time soon) so I'd bet the cheaper fares, at least for JV markets, would still mostly be on UA/NH metal.
As to the F suite rave by the OP, are you thinking of CX or the new SQ or EK suite?
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
UA is in many ways closer to CX than it is to TG, which will only allow UA to sell full fare tix on UA stock.
Last edited by Kacee; Dec 14, 2017 at 4:22 pm Reason: not sure about codeshares
#9
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: UA:1k; MR: PLT; Hilton: Gold
Posts: 1,324
Ah interesting. Didn't even realize that (shows how often I'm flying that direction)
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
#11
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Verdi, NV, SFO & Olympic (aka Squaw )Valley.
Programs: Ikon Pass Full + AS Gold + Marriott Titanium + Hilton Gold. Recovering UA Plat. LT lounge AA+DL+UA
Posts: 3,823
#13
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New England
Programs: American Gold, Marriott Gold, Hilton Silver
Posts: 5,640
No loss, no gain. CX is not an alliance player. Look at how crummy the mileage earnings are on CX. I think all CX wants are codeshares, not full alliance participation.
Before anyone mentions SkyTeam, I highly doubt that CX would even consider ST since MU is too close.
Before anyone mentions SkyTeam, I highly doubt that CX would even consider ST since MU is too close.
#14
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ANP
Programs: UA 1k, Marriott Plat, HH gold, Avis/Hertz Pres
Posts: 1,408
Airline industry braces for China Southern exit from Skyteam alliance, setting up clash with Cathay Pacific South China Morning Post
That is as good a version of the story as any of the crap floating around. The theory is that China Southern has to leave SkyTeam to partner with AA now that American owns a small chunk and once that happens (and CZ moves into OW) that CX will leave because it doesn't want to be competing just across the border with another OW member. Putting aside that the two airlines don't really compete for the same passengers today despite their closely located hubs there are plenty of reasons to think it is reasonable or stupid.
As for the impact on UA, if CX joins *A then figure some code-share beyond Hong Kong (but not into mainland China) as well as on the US side. In other words, exactly what the AA/CX relationship looks like today. That said, UA still have the NH JV (and CX won't be in a JV because no open skies and China isn't going to change that any time soon) so I'd bet the cheaper fares, at least for JV markets, would still mostly be on UA/NH metal.
As to the F suite rave by the OP, are you thinking of CX or the new SQ or EK suite?
That is as good a version of the story as any of the crap floating around. The theory is that China Southern has to leave SkyTeam to partner with AA now that American owns a small chunk and once that happens (and CZ moves into OW) that CX will leave because it doesn't want to be competing just across the border with another OW member. Putting aside that the two airlines don't really compete for the same passengers today despite their closely located hubs there are plenty of reasons to think it is reasonable or stupid.
As for the impact on UA, if CX joins *A then figure some code-share beyond Hong Kong (but not into mainland China) as well as on the US side. In other words, exactly what the AA/CX relationship looks like today. That said, UA still have the NH JV (and CX won't be in a JV because no open skies and China isn't going to change that any time soon) so I'd bet the cheaper fares, at least for JV markets, would still mostly be on UA/NH metal.
As to the F suite rave by the OP, are you thinking of CX or the new SQ or EK suite?
i saw the airliners thread, made a call over to IAD and there was an Exec meeting so this seems pretty true at least UA are talking about it.